Re: kern/179975: [igb] igb(4) fails to do polling(4)

2013-06-26 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: igb(4) fails to do polling(4) New Synopsis: [igb] igb(4) fails to do polling(4) State-Changed-From-To: open-patched State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Wed Jun 26 06:32:48 UTC 2013 State-Changed-Why: apparently is already in 9-STABLE. Responsible-Changed-From-To:

FreeBSD:: How to set VLAN priority?

2013-06-26 Thread Alex Liptsin
Hello. I work with FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE. I had configured VLANs on my server, but I can't find a way to configure VLAN priority. How can I do it? Thanks. Regards, Alex Liptsin Software Quality Assurance Engineer | Mellanox Technologies Ltd. Office: +972 (74) 7236141 Mobile: +972(54) 7833986

Re: kern/179901: [netinet] [patch] Multicast SO_REUSEADDR handled incorrectly

2013-06-26 Thread Michael Gmelin
The following reply was made to PR kern/179901; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de To: Mikolaj Golub troc...@freebsd.org Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/179901: [netinet] [patch] Multicast SO_REUSEADDR handled incorrectly Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013

Re: FreeBSD:: How to set VLAN priority?

2013-06-26 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Alex Liptsin wrote this message on Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:54 +: I work with FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE. I had configured VLANs on my server, but I can't find a way to configure VLAN priority. How can I do it? Looks like you can't w/ the default VLAN code: BUGS No 802.1Q features except

Re: FreeBSD:: How to set VLAN priority?

2013-06-26 Thread Ermal Luçi
This is a patch originially written from rwatson@ iirc. https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-tools/blob/master/patches/RELENG_10_0/pf_802.1p.diff Remove the pf(4) craft and it should work for you. On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote: Alex Liptsin wrote

Comparing Mutiqueue Support Linux vs FreeBSD

2013-06-26 Thread Takuya ASADA
Hi, Because there was an discussion about new APIs to provide better support for high performance NICs in Ottawa DevSummit BoF, I wrote a note about How Linux doing it in that area. I haven't get a enough chance to talk about it in the summit, but I decided to upload the note on a Wiki. Here's

Re: Comparing Mutiqueue Support Linux vs FreeBSD

2013-06-26 Thread Super Bisquit
If someone ports the ethtool to FreeBSD, it will only work on the i386/AMD64/ PC98 architectures. Perhaps having these suggestions as options for the kernel/GENERIC conf files would be better? On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Takuya ASADA s...@dokukino.com wrote: Hi, Because there was an

Re: kern/179999: [ofed] [patch] Bug assigning HCA from IB to ETH

2013-06-26 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: Bug assigning HCA from IB to ETH New Synopsis: [ofed] [patch] Bug assigning HCA from IB to ETH Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jun 26 23:10:19 UTC 2013 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to

Re: Comparing Mutiqueue Support Linux vs FreeBSD

2013-06-26 Thread Jack Vogel
ethtool is GPL so I wouldn't expect it to show up around here :) Implementing something like it for FreeBSD would be cool however, sometimes sysctl just seems clunky although its usually how i cope with driver things that might be changed via ethtool in Linux. Having to completely rebuild a

Re: Comparing Mutiqueue Support Linux vs FreeBSD

2013-06-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
ethtool is just a passthrough. The drivers need to implement all of those hooks. It wouldn't be that hard to reimplement. The drivers would have to reimplement it anyway - they'd have to implement the generic set of standard statistics, then export driver-specific things. You know, the stuff our