Basic recipe/expectations for VALE w/physical ports

2014-03-05 Thread Nicholas Bastin
We're continuing to have problems with VALE not forwarding packets on physical ports, and I suspect at least some of the problem is local configuration - we've tried to cobble together the right workflow between fragments from various READMEs and the source code for the module and the tools, but

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Raimundo Santos
Hello, Andreas. If table(12) is empty, how will fwd know where to send the packets that hits it? Best regards, Raimundo On 4 March 2014 02:58, Andreas Nilsson andrn...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm having a strange problem with ipfw and/or routing. I've only tested this on 9.2-RELEASE-p3,

Re: freebsd 10.0 not work carp protocol on Hyper-v

2014-03-05 Thread Maurizio Marini
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:48:09 + Abhishek Gupta (LIS) abgu...@microsoft.com wrote: Hi Abhishek -virtualization list. Hi Maurizio, Could you tell us how did you get the drivers? Did you obtain them as part of FreeBSD 10 or did you get them from our ports repo? your ports repo What

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Andreas Nilsson
Hello Raimundo On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Raimundo Santos rait...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Andreas. If table(12) is empty, how will fwd know where to send the packets that hits it? My understanding is that the rule should not be triggered, as the ... from table(12) will not match any

Re: freebsd 10.0 not work carp protocol on Hyper-v

2014-03-05 Thread Maurizio Marini
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:48:09 + Abhishek Gupta (LIS) abgu...@microsoft.com wrote: Also if you don't mind, could you describe your problem once more to me? The more detail the better. our test environment is following: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ovw0hv3cy4g2911/schema.pdf a video simulation

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 04.03.2014 09:58, Andreas Nilsson wrote: Why do I need the explict fwd rule? As far as I can see the ipfw man page says nothing about skipto changing the packets, and since the 65533 rule in the second ruleset triggers on the same thing as the skipto rule it would seem like packets are

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru wrote: On 04.03.2014 09:58, Andreas Nilsson wrote: Why do I need the explict fwd rule? As far as I can see the ipfw man page says nothing about skipto changing the packets, and since the 65533 rule in the second ruleset

C library network C libc attack consle incoming

2014-03-05 Thread Kenichi Mori
Konfusion server freebsd server demorated animation server is SGI but based Linux and AIX., tagments C library equal index.html.c Cyrillic dancers talk to mow mow halfing tone equationing tag in Courc symbol spacing really in def C., c hyperlink everyone memo write copymants.,

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 05.03.2014 23:44, Andreas Nilsson wrote: With the above ruleset a packet 1) triggering the first rule ( ie skipto no-op and the allow from any to any ) is lost. 2) triggering the second rule (ie skipto divert rule which returns it to the stack ) is forwarded. So, I don't see in the code

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Ian Smith
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 20:44:51 +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru wrote: On 04.03.2014 09:58, Andreas Nilsson wrote: Why do I need the explict fwd rule? As far as I can see the ipfw man page says nothing about skipto