Hi,
On 27/02/14 11:32, Julien Charbon wrote:
On 07/11/13 14:55, Julien Charbon wrote:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:21:04 +0100, Julien Charbon
jchar...@verisign.com wrote:
I have put technical and how-to-repeat details in below PR:
kern/183659: TCP stack lock contention with short-lived
Hi.
Is it normal after 16 days of uptime:
# vmstat -z
ITEM SIZE LIMIT USED FREE REQ FAIL SLEEP
...
16 Bucket: 152, 0, 24, 101, 193, 0, 0
32 Bucket: 280, 0, 38, 102, 329, 2, 0
64 Bucket:
Hi, as continuation of
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-September/033170.html
I like to give patches for two open problems:
The first kernel patch of the link above is not needed anymore, vanhu
pointed out:
It may be cleaner to have racoon generate the good SP entry, rather
On 5/23/14, 6:18 AM, Peter B. Pokryshev wrote:
Hi.
Is it normal after 16 days of uptime:
# vmstat -z
ITEM SIZE LIMIT USED FREE REQ FAIL SLEEP
...
16 Bucket: 152, 0, 24, 101, 193, 0, 0
32 Bucket: 280, 0,
Hello.
I'm using free bsd 10 stable. and I meet same issue as
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/189471
currently using thee fix from bycm82',it work so thank you but.
recently I meet some issue in using ipfw with table. and found some PR
about the table in ipfw. can I know what is
On 05/23/14 13:52, Julien Charbon wrote:
Hi,
On 23/05/14 14:06, Julien Charbon wrote:
On 27/02/14 11:32, Julien Charbon wrote:
On 07/11/13 14:55, Julien Charbon wrote:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:21:04 +0100, Julien Charbon
jchar...@verisign.com wrote:
I have put technical and how-to-repeat
Hi Sato,
My fix is a temp solution, and actually you can just update the source code to
the latest version or use others. According to what I know, developer Alex is
currently working/enhancing the ipfw table feature. I think you will like the
new features.
Best Regards,
bycn82
