Yes, this is normal and it doesn't mean what you might expect. It's a
generic failure counter, not an allocation failure counter. eg: if an
object that was just freed fails to fit in a per-cpu free items cache it
counts as a FAIL.
Hello, thank you for answer Peter.
But what do think about
Hi Alexander,
Since you guys are working on the “named table” feature. So I have stopped
implementing it using my way. Hence I got some time to read more about the
existing codes. This afternoon I just started to read the dummynet part, then
I have another question to ask. Maybe it is not
Ok, anyway, ignore it. :)
From: bycn82 [mailto:byc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 May, 2014 1:09
To: Alexander V. Chernikov; Luigi Rizzo
Cc: FreeBSD Net
Subject: RE: a defect in ipfw dummynet
Hi ,
After I think it twice, I think the code and the document are OK, But the
problem is from the
