[Bug 183391] [oce] 10GbE networking problems with Emulex OCE 11102 CNA

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391 --- Comment #10 from pataki.an...@gmail.com --- Like my previous reply, I can't confirm this, because we workarounded the bug in a way. (upgraded to freebsd 9.2-stable and the emulex cards are changed to intel x520 cards) I am so sorry, we

[Bug 183391] [oce] 10GbE networking problems with Emulex OCE 11102 CNA

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391 --- Comment #9 from pataki.an...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #7) > Please attach: > > * /var/run/dmesg.boot output > * pciconf pciconf -lveV Hi! I am so sorry, but we didn't kept the unusable system from 2013 oct

[Bug 183391] [oce] 10GbE networking problems with Emulex OCE 11102 CNA

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mlav...@gmail.com Summa

[Bug 183391] [oce] 10gigabit networking problems with Emulex OCE 11102 CNA

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ko...@freebsd.org Versi

Unusable Emulex "oce" driver version in -STABLE, 9.3 and CURRENT

Hello, This should be fixed before the release of 9.3, and of course as soon as possible for the rest of the branches. At least under 10-STABLE the "oce" driver can cause a panic when there's a lot of network traffic. I have been able to reproduce it using "iperf". Sometimes the panic can be t

Re: netmap

Great! :) I will give you the results as soon as I can get them :) On 17 June 2014 12:55, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Carlos Ferreira > wrote: > >> Ok, thanks for the enlightenment regarding the loss of performance. >> >> One question, just to be sure. Does the kerne

Re: netmap

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Carlos Ferreira wrote: > Ok, thanks for the enlightenment regarding the loss of performance. > > One question, just to be sure. Does the kernel module contains the VALA > switch code? Or do I need to compile extra code to have the switch working? > Also, where can

Re: netmap

Just a remainder, so that the question doesn't get lost in time. On 16 June 2014 16:30, Carlos Ferreira wrote: > Ok, thanks for the enlightenment regarding the loss of performance. > > One question, just to be sure. Does the kernel module contains the VALA > switch code? Or do I need to compile

Re: netmap pktgen

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Mahnaz Talebi wrote: > Hi, > > I read in " > > http://typo3.change-project.eu/fileadmin/publications/Deliverables/CHANGE_Deliverable_D6_3.pdf > ", > that: "Packets generated > by the Netmap PktGen were always dropped by the Linux Kernel after being > processed by

netmap pktgen

Hi, I read in " http://typo3.change-project.eu/fileadmin/publications/Deliverables/CHANGE_Deliverable_D6_3.pdf";, that: "Packets generated by the Netmap PktGen were always dropped by the Linux Kernel after being processed by the PREROUTING chain of the mangle table of Iptables." Is it true? Is th

[Bug 175734] no ethernet detected on system with EG20T PCH chipset ATOM E6xx series

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175734 Nick Hibma changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Timeout |In Discussion Resolution|Over

Re: LEDBAT (RFC-6817)i n FreeBSD as mod_cc(9)?

Hello, hiren. You wrote 17 июня 2014 г., 11:41:35: >> It looks like, that some TCP connections could benefit from LEDBAT >> (RFC-6871) cognestion control algorithm (not all, of course, it should not >> be default). >> >> Also, it looks like Apple implements one >> >> (http://www.opensourc

Re: LEDBAT (RFC-6817)i n FreeBSD as mod_cc(9)?

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-net. > > It looks like, that some TCP connections could benefit from LEDBAT > (RFC-6871) cognestion control algorithm (not all, of course, it should not > be default). > > Also, it looks like Apple implements one > >