Hello all,
A new v0.4 patch is available at [1]. This release is mostly bug-fixes
and improvements to core functionality (establishing/closing
connections, retransmissions etc), and also brings the implementation up
to a more recent version of FreeBSD-HEAD.
The full list of changes and
Hi Nigel,
Nigel Williams wrote:
A new v0.4 patch is available at [1]. [...]
Thanks a lot for publishing the latest patch. Already tried it on two phyiscal
machines with directly connected NICs.
iperf looks nice:
===
Luigi one question. Does netmap requires a processor with 64 bits? I'm
having some trouble in compiling netmap, using the same Makefile I used
previously, but for an Intel IXP435 CPU (Gateworks Cambria).
On 28 June 2014 14:07, Carlos Ferreira carlosmf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello to all.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Carlos Ferreira carlosmf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Luigi one question. Does netmap requires a processor with 64 bits? I'm
having some trouble in compiling netmap, using the same Makefile I used
previously, but for an Intel IXP435 CPU (Gateworks Cambria).
it used
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 6:31:43 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, July 03, 2014 8:51:01 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
Russell L. Carter wrote:
On 07/02/14 19:09, Rick Macklem wrote:
Could you please post the dmesg stuff for the network
In testing two Chelsio T580-CR dual port cards with FreeBSD 10-STABLE,
I've been able to use a collection of clients to generate approximately
1.5-1.6 million TCP packets per second sustained, and routinely hit
10GB/s, both measured by netstat -d -b -w1 -W (I usually use -h for the
quick read,
I'm building for OpenWRT (trunk) for the IXP4xx target.
Attached goes the output for the compile attempt. Maybe I'm missing
something very basic...
On 11 July 2014 17:13, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Carlos Ferreira carlosmf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Marcelo;
I recently had a case where an Intel card was flapping, but using LR
transceivers. Turns out, the cable ends needed to be re-polished, as not
enough light was making it through to register transmit power.
You and the networking people may want to spend a few moments exploring
that path.
On 11 Jul 2014, at 17:28 , John Jasem jja...@gmail.com wrote:
c) the defaults for the cxgbe driver appear to be 8 rx queues, and N tx
queues, with N being the number of CPUs detected. For a system running
multiple cards, routing or firewalling, does this make sense, or would
balancing tx and
On 07/11/14 11:03, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 11 Jul 2014, at 17:28 , John Jasem jja...@gmail.com wrote:
c) the defaults for the cxgbe driver appear to be 8 rx queues, and
N tx queues, with N being the number of CPUs detected. For a system
running multiple cards, routing or firewalling, does
On 07/11/14 10:28, John Jasem wrote:
In testing two Chelsio T580-CR dual port cards with FreeBSD 10-STABLE,
I've been able to use a collection of clients to generate approximately
1.5-1.6 million TCP packets per second sustained, and routinely hit
10GB/s, both measured by netstat -d -b -w1 -W
OK, ignore what I said in the last e-mail. My Makefile is nor working
properly and I'm trying to figure out why. OpenWRT documentation for module
Makefiles creation is scarce and confuse...
On 11 July 2014 18:27, Carlos Ferreira carlosmf...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm building for OpenWRT (trunk) for
On 07/11/2014 03:32 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On 07/11/14 10:28, John Jasem wrote:
In testing two Chelsio T580-CR dual port cards with FreeBSD 10-STABLE,
I've been able to use a collection of clients to generate approximately
1.5-1.6 million TCP packets per second sustained, and routinely hit
Em 11/07/2014 14:43, John Jasem escreveu:
Marcelo;
I recently had a case where an Intel card was flapping, but using LR
transceivers. Turns out, the cable ends needed to be re-polished, as not
enough light was making it through to register transmit power.
You and the networking people may want
14 matches
Mail list logo
