https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
--- Comment #7 from dgilb...@eicat.ca ---
I can also add that I have an application that uses if_tun interfaces and they
don't exhibit the ng_iface problems. Nor do the gif interfaces exhibit the
problem when the packet has not arrived on a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
--- Comment #6 from dgilb...@eicat.ca ---
I'd like to quickly respond before things veer away. The problem exists when
pf is not even loaded or enabled. I brought in some pf examples to try to
discern which parts of the stack "see" the pac
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:18 PM, David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm needing to use netmap on a custom driver, I don't understand the
> content of the functions I need to implement and that are detailed on
> "PORTING" file.
>
>
sometimes (often, actually) the hw has bottlenecks that make native
netmap mo
Hi,
I'm needing to use netmap on a custom driver, I don't understand the
content of the functions I need to implement and that are detailed on
"PORTING" file.
can someone give a hand to understand it better?
regards
--
David Díaz Barquero
Ingeniería en Computadores
Tecnológico de Costa Rica
_
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
--
Jason Hellenthal
Mobile: +1 (616) 953-0176
jhellent...@dataix.net
JJH48-ARIN
> On Aug 27, 2014, at 16:46, David wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I want to add netmap support for my net driver, but I don't understand very
> well the steps on "PORT
hi,
I want to add netmap support for my net driver, but I don't understand very
well the steps on "PORTING" file.
I'd like to join the mail list and check if someone could help me or if
someone has gone for the same path. How do I join?
--
David Díaz Barquero
Ingeniería en Computadores
Tecnoló
On 27 Aug 2014, at 18:55 , Jonathan Price wrote:
> Would that mean that a line such as 'ifconfig_IF="DHCP"' would not count the
> interface as being explicitly configured? I haven’t looked into SLAAC or
> DHCPv6 configuration yet, so I'm not sure if either of those require a line
> like the o
I was over-simplifying and, as you state, any interface explicitly
configured for IPv6 will have IPv6 disabled. Those with explicit IPv6
configuration will not be disabled.
Most end-user systems are NOT configured with an address. In most cases
SLAAC (and, perhaps DHCPv6) along with things like
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
> > While doubting Peter's networking answers is usually foolish, I think
> this
> > one is at least a bit misleading. As he says,
> > ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES" will set all interfaces on the system
> to
> > -ifdisable which, since it is an IPv6 op
On 27 Aug 2014, at 06:31 , Jonathan Price wrote:
> On 2014-08-27 01:40, Peter Wemm wrote:
>> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 10:40:27 free...@jonathanprice.org wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am configuring a server with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and have noticed that
>>> FreeBSD seems to be preferring IPv
> While doubting Peter's networking answers is usually foolish, I think this
> one is at least a bit misleading. As he says,
> ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES" will set all interfaces on the system to
> -ifdisable which, since it is an IPv6 option, will enable IPv6 on all
> interfaces. NO will di
Yep
On 2014-8-27, at 9:53, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Ok. Is it the same patch you sent out in Feb?
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 27 August 2014 00:43, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>> Not as far as I know.
>>
>> Lars
>>
>> On 2014-8-27, at 9:39, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a PR for it?
>>>
>>>
>>> -a
>
Ok. Is it the same patch you sent out in Feb?
-a
On 27 August 2014 00:43, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Not as far as I know.
>
> Lars
>
> On 2014-8-27, at 9:39, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> Is there a PR for it?
>>
>>
>> -a
>>
>>
>> On 27 August 2014 00:23, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>>> It would be great if
Not as far as I know.
Lars
On 2014-8-27, at 9:39, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Is there a PR for it?
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 27 August 2014 00:23, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>> It would be great if people could also review Aris' PRR patch - RFC6937 has
>> been out for a while.
>>
>> Lars
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Is there a PR for it?
-a
On 27 August 2014 00:23, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> It would be great if people could also review Aris' PRR patch - RFC6937 has
> been out for a while.
>
> Lars
>
>
>
>
> On 2014-8-26, at 20:09, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm going to merge Tom's work in a week un
It would be great if people could also review Aris' PRR patch - RFC6937 has
been out for a while.
Lars
prr.patch
Description: Binary data
On 2014-8-26, at 20:09, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm going to merge Tom's work in a week unless someone gives me a
> really good reason not to.
>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Jonathan Price
wrote:
> On 2014-08-27 01:40, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 10:40:27 free...@jonathanprice.org wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am configuring a server with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and have noticed
>>> that
>>> FreeBSD seems to be
17 matches
Mail list logo
