On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:59:54 +0200 Gerrit Kühn
wrote about Re: NFS on 10G interfaces still painfully slow:
GK> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 1.403620 secs (747051194 bytes/sec)
GK> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 1.380546 secs (759537249 bytes/sec)
Argh! ;-)
Obviously, I cannot read and misco
> On 03 Aug 2016, at 04:32, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> If you have gateway_enable="YES" (sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1)
> then try to disable this forwarding setting and rerun your tests to compare
> results.
Thank you Eugene for this, but net.inet.ip.forwarding is disabled by default
and I
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:45:07 -0600 Alan Somers wrote
about Re: NFS on 10G interfaces still painfully slow:
> > Is there anyone around here who can confirm that nfs can go faster
> > over 10G links?
> > Any hints for further tuning/debugging are greatly appreciated.
AS> I can get 1GB/s over NFS on
03.08.2016 1:43, Ben RUBSON пишет:
Hello,
I'm trying to reach the 40Gb/s max throughtput between 2 hosts running a
ConnectX-3 Mellanox network adapter.
If you have gateway_enable="YES" (sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1)
then try to disable this forwarding setting and rerun your tests to compar
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:55:02AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:48:52PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> > Slawa wrote:
> > >I have autofs NFSv4 mount with /etc/nfs.map:
> > >
> > >/NFS-nfsv4,intr,soft,sec=krb5i,gssname=host storage01:/
> > >
> > >Currently I am
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211386
Ngie Cooper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People
Summa
Alan Somers wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I already reported this issue here a year ago and unfortunately was not
>> able to fix it back then. Now I had another run at it, using two recent
>> 10.3-machines with a direct 10G link. I still see nfs is pa
Slawa wrote:
>I have autofs NFSv4 mount with /etc/nfs.map:
>
>/NFS-nfsv4,intr,soft,sec=krb5i,gssname=host storage01:/
>
>Currently I am see NFS hung and I am can't kill shell and can't
>unmount /NFS.
>
>Is NFSv4 mount interruptible?
>Or intr support only by NFSv3?
Well, in the BUGS section of "
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:48:52PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Slawa wrote:
> >I have autofs NFSv4 mount with /etc/nfs.map:
> >
> >/NFS-nfsv4,intr,soft,sec=krb5i,gssname=host storage01:/
> >
> >Currently I am see NFS hung and I am can't kill shell and can't
> >unmount /NFS.
> >
> >Is NFSv4 mo
I have autofs NFSv4 mount with /etc/nfs.map:
/NFS-nfsv4,intr,soft,sec=krb5i,gssname=host storage01:/
Currently I am see NFS hung and I am can't kill shell and can't
unmount /NFS.
Is NFSv4 mount interruptible?
Or intr support only by NFSv3?
___
free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211386
Sergey Kandaurov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluk...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211386
Ngie Cooper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Kernel build failes when|Kernel build fails when
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211441
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.o |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211386
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
K
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211219
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211062
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||IntelNetworking
Assignee|
> On 02 Aug 2016, at 21:35, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
> Hi,
Thank you for your answer Hans Petter !
> The CX-3 driver doesn't bind the worker threads to specific CPU cores by
> default, so if your CPU has more than one so-called numa, you'll end up that
> the bottle-neck is the high-speed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208136
John Baldwin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
On 08/02/16 20:43, Ben RUBSON wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to reach the 40Gb/s max throughtput between 2 hosts running a
ConnectX-3 Mellanox network adapter.
FreeBSD 10.3 just installed, last updates performed.
Network adapters running last firmwares / last drivers.
No workload at all, just iPerf
Hello,
I'm trying to reach the 40Gb/s max throughtput between 2 hosts running a
ConnectX-3 Mellanox network adapter.
FreeBSD 10.3 just installed, last updates performed.
Network adapters running last firmwares / last drivers.
No workload at all, just iPerf as the benchmark tool.
### Step 1 :
I
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I already reported this issue here a year ago and unfortunately was not
> able to fix it back then. Now I had another run at it, using two recent
> 10.3-machines with a direct 10G link. I still see nfs is painfully
> slow (around 20-
> On 02 Aug 2016, at 10:49, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
>
> Is there anyone around here who can confirm that nfs can go faster over
> 10G links?
> Any hints for further tuning/debugging are greatly appreciated.
Can you show us ifconfig output, please?
Borja.
Hi all,
I already reported this issue here a year ago and unfortunately was not
able to fix it back then. Now I had another run at it, using two recent
10.3-machines with a direct 10G link. I still see nfs is painfully
slow (around 20-80MB/s). I tried both nfsv3 and nfsv4, with almost the same
res
23 matches
Mail list logo