https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230465
--- Comment #3 from Charles Goncalves ---
I've noted that in POLLIN this:
poll(pfd, rxrings, -1);
Doesn't work, need it to be something like:
poll(pfd, rxrings, 1);
But with this I have a latency problem.
And I also have noted that I
The phy code hasn't changed in any material way that I can see in a
long time. So I wonder if it's timing or some initialization issue.
e1000_get_hw_semaphore
e1000_put_hw_semaphore
e1000_read_phy_reg_i2c
This looks a bit funny, I think the hw sem should be held over the i2c
call. Is there a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230807
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eu...@freebsd.org,
Hi all,
> Am 22.08.2018 um 17:00 schrieb Kajetan Staszkiewicz :
> Is there a preferred way to configure sysctls for modules loaded from
> kld_list?
We found the same problem in our setup making extensive use of if_bridge.
Now we simply load that module early via loader.conf - all sysctls
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230807
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
Kevin Bowling wrote:
> Roman,
>
> Interesting.. can you set DBG to 1 sys/dev/e1000/e1000_osdep.h Line
> 109 so we can see closer what is failing to initialize?
Hi Kevin,
Here's a relevant bit of dmesg with debug enabled:
igb1: port 0xe040-0xe05f mem
