https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
--- Comment #4 from Cy Schubert ---
Created attachment 205341
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=205341&action=edit
Updated patch
I suppose I'll post my version of your patch. I'm far from finished, I'm still
digging
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
--- Comment #3 from WHR ---
I'm actually didn't noticed that 'fd_local' is just been set but not used in
the code; but it doesn't cause the issue in my test, 'fd_local' is 0 in all
rules.
By inserting printf(8)s to 'ipf_rule_compare', and m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
--- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: cy
Date: Wed Jun 26 00:53:49 UTC 2019
New revision: 349401
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/349401
Log:
While working on PR/238796 I disc
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
--- Comment #1 from Cy Schubert ---
Thanks for the patch. It is being reviewed along with the bug itself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206544
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
25.06.2019 19:40, Christian M wrote:
> I've disabled them all on both VM's with FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE (ifconfig xn0
> -txcsum -rxcsum -lro -tso), and also tried disabling everything for the VIF
> via XCP-ng earlier. It made no difference unfortunately.
Then you should try to bring the interface to
On 06/25/2019 3:13 pm, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 25.06.2019 15:59, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 06/25/2019 4:18 am, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 24.06.2019 23:10, Larry Rosenman wrote:
#5 0x828ee5b7 in ng_snd_item (item=0xf8021e3b4d80,
flags=0)
at /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_base.c:
On 25.06.2019 15:59, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 06/25/2019 4:18 am, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> On 24.06.2019 23:10, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> #5 0x828ee5b7 in ng_snd_item (item=0xf8021e3b4d80,
> flags=0)
> at /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_base.c:2252
It looks like y
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
Cy Schubert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |c...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206544
Munna changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||munna1991vik...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 f
There's a mistake in my reply below.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:56:43PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 01:55:40PM +0200, Christian M wrote:
> > I've made two tests while running tcpdump on the xcp-ng host. I'm not at
> > all qualified to interpret the .pcap files from tcpd
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 01:55:40PM +0200, Christian M wrote:
> I've made two tests while running tcpdump on the xcp-ng host. I'm not at
> all qualified to interpret the .pcap files from tcpdump, but I've put them
> on Google Drive and linked them below the two tests. Perhaps someone more
> qualifie
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238789
--- Comment #5 from Greg Becker ---
Sure Kubilay, here's my backtrace. It's from a kernel module I am working on
that I have not yet published. I hit this easily with GENERIC, but never hit
it when running with the patch I supplied:
pani
On 06/25/2019 4:18 am, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 24.06.2019 23:10, Larry Rosenman wrote:
#5 0x828ee5b7 in ng_snd_item (item=0xf8021e3b4d80,
flags=0)
at /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_base.c:2252
It looks like you use some netgraph based ethernet interface.
The system got received
I've disabled them all on both VM's with FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE (ifconfig xn0
-txcsum -rxcsum -lro -tso), and also tried disabling everything for the VIF
via XCP-ng earlier. It made no difference unfortunately.
Den tis 25 juni 2019 kl 14:08 skrev Eugene Grosbein :
> 25.06.2019 18:55, Christian M wr
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019, at 01:05, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > Hi Tom
> > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/config-network-setup.html
>
> > NDIS may do what you want but it may suck.
>
> > In terms of time vs effort a 15$ USB Ethernet dongle is going to be your
> > best result
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238789
--- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak ---
Thank you for the follow-up Greg. I forgot to ask originally, do you have a
panic message and backtrace available? Please include it as an attachment if so
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238789
Greg Becker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@codeconcepts.com
--- Comment #3
25.06.2019 18:55, Christian M wrote:
> Please note the
> extremely uneven throughput for test 2 below. It's almost like the
> throughput increased when running tcpdump simultaneously.
Generally this indicates broken "hardware" offload for some features
like txcsum/rxcsum/vlan_hwcsum/vlan_hwtaggin
I've made two tests while running tcpdump on the xcp-ng host. I'm not at
all qualified to interpret the .pcap files from tcpdump, but I've put them
on Google Drive and linked them below the two tests. Perhaps someone more
qualified could have a look for anything useful in there. Please note the
ext
* Mel Pilgrim [190625 04:47]:
> On 2019-06-24 19:33, Ultima wrote:
>> While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't
>> think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that don't run
>> on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very hard
>> to drop
On 25.06.19 04:47, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
On 2019-06-24 19:33, Ultima wrote:
Hello Mel,
While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't
think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that
don't run
on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very ha
On 24.06.2019 23:10, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> #5 0x828ee5b7 in ng_snd_item (item=0xf8021e3b4d80, flags=0)
>>> at /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_base.c:2252
>>
>> It looks like you use some netgraph based ethernet interface.
>> The system got received ARP request and is going to send the
23 matches
Mail list logo
