Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD

[repost since it appears to be blocked] On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:42 PM Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > > > Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden : > > > > Greetings > > > > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have > > started with the porting of VPP

Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD

On Monday, May 10, 2021, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > > Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden : > > > > Greetings > > > > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have > started with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD. > > > > Currently we have

[Bug 255671] ixl(4) netmap pkt-gen stops transmitting

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255671 --- Comment #2 from Brian Poole --- Hello Ozkan, Thank you very much for your comment! I have not seen any failures in tx/rx or tx/tx configurations since setting hw.ixl.enable_head_writeback=0. Now that I know what to search for, I found

Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:08:18AM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote: > Greetings > > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have started > with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD. > > Currently we have VPP compiled and running with netmap. The speeds we

Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 8:42 AM Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > > Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden : > > > > Greetings > > > > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have > started with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD. > > > > Currently we

Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD

> Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden : > > Greetings > > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have started > with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD. > > Currently we have VPP compiled and running with netmap. The speeds we measure >

Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD

Greetings We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have started with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD. Currently we have VPP compiled and running with netmap. The speeds we measure are nowhere near the performance of a 10Gbps link, at around 350kpps for

[Bug 255671] ixl(4) netmap pkt-gen stops transmitting

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255671 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||IntelNetworking -- You are

[Bug 245277] mbuf_tag PACKET_TAG_IPFORWARD is not honored for host routes

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245277 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu

[Bug 255705] Routing does not honor mbuf_tag PACKET_TAG_IPFORWARD correctly

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255705 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu

[Bug 255558] No IPv4/ARP traffic on vlan interface when using IntX.Y notation, vlanXY works

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28 Lutz Donnerhacke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||don...@freebsd.org

[Bug 255558] No IPv4/ARP traffic on vlan interface when using IntX.Y notation, vlanXY works

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Hoffmann --- I tried the same steps with FreeBSD-14.0-CURRENT-amd64-20210429-b9820bca183-246384-mini-memstick.img and could NOT reproduce this. please close this pr. best regards Daniel -- You are receiving

[Bug 245277] mbuf_tag PACKET_TAG_IPFORWARD is not honored for host routes

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245277 --- Comment #9 from Lutz Donnerhacke --- (In reply to bugs.freebsd.org from comment #8) The ipfw code does not do any lookup of the route table, it's only adding a tag to the mbuf containing the packet. So if there is any difference