https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230465
--- Comment #44 from Vincenzo Maffione ---
What if you set
hw.ixl.enable_head_writeback = 0
in /boot/loader.conf and reboot?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Il giorno mar 18 mag 2021 alle ore 09:32 Kevin Bowling <
kevin.bowl...@kev009.com> ha scritto:
>
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20 AM Marko Zec wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +
>> Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>>
>> > On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255388
--- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3d846e48227e2e78c1e7b35145f57353ffda56ba
commit 3d846e48227e2e78c1e7b35145f57353ffda56ba
Author:
+1
Thanks,
Vincenzo
Il giorno lun 17 mag 2021 alle ore 19:20 Marko Zec ha scritto:
> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +
> Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
> > On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode.
> > >
> > > In
On 5/18/21 5:46 PM, Guy Yur wrote:
Hi,
I was looking for examples on how to use fib6_lookup_rt and noticed
there are comparisons between sa_len and AF_ flags in netflow.c
if (nh->gw_sa.sa_len == AF_INET)
if (nh->gw_sa.sa_len == AF_INET6)
Are these typos for sa_family?
Hi,
According to:
On 5/18/21 9:18 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
The issue seems to be that rip6_output() calls into ip6_setpktopts()
outside of the net epoch. Should I just wrap the setpktopts call in a
net epoch enter/exit, or does anybody think that there's something
cleverer that should be done there?
Hi,
Epoch
Recently at work we saw a panic in ip6_setpktopt() while it's using an
ifnet returned by ifnet_byindex, here:
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/netinet6/ip6_output.c#n2969
The issue seems to be that rip6_output() calls into ip6_setpktopts()
outside of the net epoch. Should I just wrap the
Hi,
I was looking for examples on how to use fib6_lookup_rt and noticed
there are comparisons between sa_len and AF_ flags in netflow.c
if (nh->gw_sa.sa_len == AF_INET)
if (nh->gw_sa.sa_len == AF_INET6)
Are these typos for sa_family?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230465
s...@zxy.spb.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@zxy.spb.ru
--- Comment #43
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236119
--- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch stable/12 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=1a132077c2cb500410079f9120c3f676d15f7931
commit 1a132077c2cb500410079f9120c3f676d15f7931
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236119
--- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=a7e6edc7d70fbe5d82faeda0bc6ae37550c2080f
commit a7e6edc7d70fbe5d82faeda0bc6ae37550c2080f
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20 AM Marko Zec wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +
> Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
> > On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode.
> > >
> > > In the test setup depicted here
> > >
12 matches
Mail list logo
