https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276760
--- Comment #8 from crypt47 ---
As for the ipfw configuration, I don't want to post it in full, but I use
ipfw_f add 10 reass all from any to any in // ASSEMBLING
in the beginning. Some nat translation later. Nothing special. Also mss fi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276760
--- Comment #7 from crypt47 ---
If you view the attached 80.dump file with Wireshark and check "validate the
TCP checksum" option, it will complain about server (10.0.0.53) packets. Can't
say how much it's relevant, because it's not the ser
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276760
--- Comment #6 from crypt47 ---
(In reply to Zhenlei Huang from comment #4)
It is very simple. We have one machine "A" with outgoing interface (vtnet0) and
some virtual (like ipsec0 or tun0).
We also have another VM "B" in the same networ
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276760
--- Comment #5 from crypt47 ---
Created attachment 248169
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=248169&action=edit
port 80 dump
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276760
--- Comment #4 from Zhenlei Huang ---
(In reply to crypt47 from comment #0)
> but was extreamly slow, when traffic crosses vtnet and VPN interfaces
May you please elaborate your setup that how the traffic crosses vtnet and VPN
interfaces ?
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, at 20:20, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I there any public source repository for the development of VPP on
> FreeBSD? Any link to follow?
>
> Benoît
I’m working to upstream changes right now and plan to start a development
branch early next week.
- Tom
I there any public source repository for the development of VPP on FreeBSD? Any
link to follow?
Benoît
