Re: Multipath TCP, what's the progress, if there is any?

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Peter G. wrote: > A few years back a working group announced their work on MPTCP for FreeBSD, > http://caia.swin.edu.au/newtcp/mptcp/. Around that time also a QR mentioned > the project, >

FreeBSD 11.0 / netmap-fwd / ngeth0 / vrrp / vif

Hi, curious, Ive tried netmapfwd with ngeth0 / vrrp and it doesnt seem to be passing packets through to the VIF. basically its a pair of redundent BGP routers. Does ngeth and VRRP work with netmap-fwd ? or am i going to need to look at using openvswitch ? Thanks

Re: MPTCP for FreeBSD repository on BitBucket/v0.51 update

Nigel... seriously... /*-^M * Copyright (c) 2012-2015^M * Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.^M * All rights reserved.^M *^M * This software was developed at the Centre for Advanced Internet^M * Architectures, Swinburne University of Technology, by Nigel Williams

Re: Ethernet tunneling options under FreeBSD

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:40 PM, James Lott ja...@lottspot.com wrote: you haven't really described the network well enough.. try an ascii-art diagram (don't forget to set fixed width font :-) a VPN required two ends.. one is FreeBSD... what's the other? The thing is, the other could be

Re: Multipath TCP for FreeBSD v0.4

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:32 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote: Hi, We recently released a new tech report Design Overview of Multipath TCP version 0.4 for FreeBSD-11 [1]. The report provides some details on various

Re: Multipath TCP for FreeBSD v0.4

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2014, at 17:59, Outback Dingo wrote: Im quite curious why you would want to include something thats been found to be broken and not functional into mainline if it was working sure... im sure we

Re: Terrible ix performance

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 07/03/13 14:28, Outback Dingo wrote: Ive got a high end storage server here, iperf shows decent network io iperf -i 10 -t 20 -c 10.0.96.1 -w 2.5M -l 2.5M

Re: Terrible ix performance

=4194304 # System tuning net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144 # System tuning net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344 # System tuning net.inet.udp.recvspace=65536 # System tuning net.local.stream.recvspace=65536 # System tuning net.local.stream.sendspace=65536 On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi

Re: Terrible ix performance

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 07/03/13 22:58, Outback Dingo wrote: On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org mailto:lstew...@freebsd.org wrote: On 07/03/13 14:28, Outback Dingo wrote: Ive got a high

Re: Terrible ix performance

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 07/04/13 10:18, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: - Original Message - From: Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com To: Lawrence

Re: Terrible ix performance

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 07/04/13 13:06, Outback Dingo wrote: On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org mailto:lstew...@freebsd.org wrote: On 07/04/13 10:18, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Wed, Jul 3

Terrible ix performance

Ive got a high end storage server here, iperf shows decent network io iperf -i 10 -t 20 -c 10.0.96.1 -w 2.5M -l 2.5M Client connecting to 10.0.96.1, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 2.50 MByte (WARNING: requested 2.50 MByte)

Re: Implementation of SCPS

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote: It is definitely interesting. On the other hand, I work for one of the major players in the field, so I am quite subjective. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Konrad Witaszczyk konrad.witaszc...@uj.edu.pl wrote: Hi, I'm

Re: ports/net/click anyone ?

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote: [Cc to ports@freebsd,org, but please followup at n...@freebsd.org] anyone interested in taking over maintainership of ports/net/click ? We have 1.5.0 in the tree, which is old and partly broken. Luigi, coming back to an