FreeBSD 10.2 , ospf vs. aggregated static routes, performance issue

2015-08-25 Thread Evgeny Khorokhorin
Hi, I have 10.2-STABLE, 2 CPU Intel E5-2643v3, network Intel XL710 with 1.4.0 driver from Intel I know that going through routing table is very fast (rn_match). But I decided to optimize routing table. I'm using 2 interfaces - ixl0 and ixl1. Behind ixl0 I have 304 networks 172.16.. from /28

Re: FreeBSD 10.2 , ospf vs. aggregated static routes, performance issue

2015-08-25 Thread Alexander V . Chernikov
25.08.2015, 17:46, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org: On 8/25/15 10:07 PM, Evgeny Khorokhorin wrote:  Hi,  I have 10.2-STABLE, 2 CPU Intel E5-2643v3, network Intel XL710 with  1.4.0 driver from Intel  I know that going through routing table is very fast (rn_match). But  I decided to

Re: FreeBSD 10.2 , ospf vs. aggregated static routes, performance issue

2015-08-25 Thread Julian Elischer
On 8/25/15 10:07 PM, Evgeny Khorokhorin wrote: Hi, I have 10.2-STABLE, 2 CPU Intel E5-2643v3, network Intel XL710 with 1.4.0 driver from Intel I know that going through routing table is very fast (rn_match). But I decided to optimize routing table. I'm using 2 interfaces - ixl0 and ixl1.