On 04/03/18 12:54, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 03.04.2018 13:45, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Can anybody give any hint about the above behaviours or point me to good
documentation? The man pages is very brief on this, unfortunately.
Hi,
ipfw uses M_SKIP_FIREWALL flag for self-generated packets.
On 04/03/18 12:54, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 03.04.2018 13:45, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Can anybody give any hint about the above behaviours or point me to good
documentation? The man pages is very brief on this, unfortunately.
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
ipfw uses M_SKIP_FIREWALL flag
On 03.04.2018 13:45, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> Can anybody give any hint about the above behaviours or point me to good
>> documentation? The man pages is very brief on this, unfortunately.
>
> Hi,
>
> ipfw uses M_SKIP_FIREWALL flag for self-generated packets. Thus
> keep-alive packets are sent
On 03.04.2018 13:15, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Test 3: let's introduce NAT
>
>> ipfw add 99 skipto 1 tcp from any to external-host http setup
>> keep-state
>
> (skipto 1 is used to allow nat rules).
> With the same external host as before, now the rule times out!
>
> Test 5: fwd to a ja
: owner-freebsd-drivers@freebsd.orgOn Behalf OfSomayajulu, David
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 10:11:10 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Meny Yossefi; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD
Hi Meny,
Does OFED in FreeBSD currently support
Hi Meny,
Does OFED in FreeBSD currently support NvMe over Fabrics ?
Thanks
David S.
-Original Message-
From: Meny Yossefi [mailto:me...@mellanox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 5:27 AM
To: Somayajulu, David ; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD
Hi
rsion 1.5.4 is 3.2. Just curious what 2.0+
version is ?
Am I correct that HEAD supports RoCE v2 ?
Thanks
David S. (davi...@freebsd.org)
-Original Message-
From: Meny Yossefi [mailto:me...@mellanox.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 2:11 AM
To: Somayajulu, David ; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subj
mellanox.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 2:11 AM
To: Somayajulu, David ; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD
Hi David,
Answers embedded below.
-Meny
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf O
Hi David,
Answers embedded below.
-Meny
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Somayajulu, David
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 8:08 PM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD
Hi,
1. Is
On Wed, 11 May 2016 11:27:20 -0700 "K. Macy" wrote
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Chris H wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:25:24 -0700 hiren panchasara
> > wrote
> >
> >> + Kip, Scott.
> >>
> >> On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David Somayajulu wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> > I have a couple of questio
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Chris H wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:25:24 -0700 hiren panchasara
> wrote
>
>> + Kip, Scott.
>>
>> On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David Somayajulu wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> > I have a couple of questions on iflib :
>> >
>> > 1. Are there plans to incorporate iflib i
On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:25:24 -0700 hiren panchasara
wrote
> + Kip, Scott.
>
> On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David Somayajulu wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I have a couple of questions on iflib :
> >
> > 1. Are there plans to incorporate iflib into CURRENT. If yes, will it
> > make it into FreeBSD11 rel
; Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:31 PM
> To: hiren panchasara
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; sco...@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org;
> David Somayajulu
> Subject: Re: Questions on iflib
>
> I'm waiting on erj to commit his ixl update. It will go in immediately
&g
panchasara
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; sco...@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org;
David Somayajulu
Subject: Re: Questions on iflib
I'm waiting on erj to commit his ixl update. It will go in immediately
following that with an ixgbe and ixl driver. It would have also included a bxe
driver, bu
I'm waiting on erj to commit his ixl update. It will go in immediately
following that with an ixgbe and ixl driver. It would have also included a
bxe driver, but the original bxe driver is too flaky to even test that
cabling is OK and my 10GbaseT version frequently had unrecoverable dmae
errors. It
+ Kip, Scott.
On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David Somayajulu wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have a couple of questions on iflib :
>
> 1. Are there plans to incorporate iflib into CURRENT. If yes, will it
> make it into FreeBSD11 release ?
Yes. The library itself (without any drivers) is being prepared for
Dave Duchscher writes:
> Robert Huff wrote:
>
>Synopsis of my (apparent) problem: DISCOVER, OFFER, REQUEST,
> and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT all happen correctly ... but the information
> doesn't make it to ifconfig or the routing table.
> Have you tried commenting everything out of dhclient.conf?
On Apr 1, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Synopsis of my (apparent) problem: DISCOVER, OFFER, REQUEST,
> and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT all happen correctly ... but the information
> doesn't make it to ifconfig or the routing table.
Have you tried commenting everything out of dhclient.conf
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Dave Duchscher wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Rick Miller wrote:
>
>
> >
> > The conversation between a DHCP server and client consists of the initial
> > DHCP DISCOVER request from the client broadcasted to the network to
> which a
> > DHCP ACK is expected
Dave Duchscher writes:
> The description of the DHCP packet flow is incorrect. DHCP packet
> flow is the following for clients requesting a new lease. Diagram
> below copied from RFC 2131. For clients renewing a lease, only
> the REQUEST and ACK steps are done.
>
> Server
Willy Offermans
> Does em0 supports TSO?
No: see "http://users.rcn.com/roberthuff/dhc_ifconfig";. Or at least
it's not enabled.
> and do you have ipfw running at the same time?
Yes ... but this setup has been running with the same ipfw rules for
years. The only change is the version
On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
>>[Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed. Thanks.]
>>
>>I have a system, running r263263, where dhclient is misbehaving.
>> (Yes - this is CURRENT, but I have no reason
Hello Robert, Rick and FreeBSD friends,
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 08:48:21AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> > [Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed. Thanks.]
> >
> > I have a system, running r263263, where dhclient is misb
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
> [Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed. Thanks.]
>
> I have a system, running r263263, where dhclient is misbehaving.
> (Yes - this is CURRENT, but I have no reason to believe this inherently a
> version-specific issue.
>> This is the relevant portion of dhclient.conf:
>>
>> http://users.rcn.com/dhclient.conf
>
> File not found
ooops - try "http://users.rcn.com/roberthuff/dhclient.conf";
>> Upon execution, I get this:
>
>> http://users.rcn.com/roberthuff/dhcp_offer
>
>You're getting on
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
> [Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed. Thanks.]
>
> I have a system, running r263263, where dhclient is misbehaving.
> (Yes - this is CURRENT, but I have no reason to believe this inherently a
> version-specific issue. I
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
> Hello:
> Is this the correct place to ask?
Yes.
Cheers,
Hiren
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 05/16/2010 23:21, dave jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I mount ntfs partition(/dev/ad4s3) using fuse-ntfs on FreeBSD and want
> to export it via NFS
> with no luck:
>
> # mount_ntfs-3g /dev/ad4s3 /wxp
> # cat /etc/exports
> /wxp -alldirs -maproot=root -network 192.168.1/24
>From this I assume that the
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> There is a very experimental patch to the em driver, not endorsed by the
> em driver author (for unknown reasons) that some users claim helps with
> SMP performance. See
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-December/020441.htm
Hello Ivan,
>> Try reducing the number of CPUs, it might help by reducing contention.
>
> Ok, I'll try.
>
I have tested reducing the number of CPUs but it was helpless because
it causes my system to hang.
Regards,
Siquijor
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org m
Hello Ivan,
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enig69E41D4C44B97AD296C94242
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Siquijor Philips wrote:
> Hello Eugene,
>=20
>> Traffic bandwidth does not matter (or much less), P
Siquijor Philips wrote:
> Hello Eugene,
>
>> Traffic bandwidth does not matter (or much less), PPS rate matters.
>> Packets drop due to high pps rate. Higher packet size, lesser pps
>> saturates link and pps just can't grow high. It can with smaller packets.
>>
>
> All the test scenarios here are
Hello Eugene,
> Traffic bandwidth does not matter (or much less), PPS rate matters.
> Packets drop due to high pps rate. Higher packet size, lesser pps
> saturates link and pps just can't grow high. It can with smaller packets.
>
All the test scenarios here are bombarded with 1-Gig of network
tra
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:14:11PM +0800, Siquijor Philips wrote:
> Can someone explain why FreeBSD network throughput (both incoming and
> outgoing traffic) decreases when smaller frame size being processed?
> With smaller frame size, corresponding packet rate (packet/sec or pps)
> increases and
Thanks! That all make sense.
Wei
- Original Message
From: Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Weiguang Shi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2007 1:51:38 AM
Subject: Re: questions wrt ng_netflow
Weiguang,
Weiguang,
sorry for late answer, I'm too loaded with daytime job.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:40:30AM -0700, Weiguang Shi wrote:
W> I've been reading netlfow.c in FreeBSD-6.2 and this piece of code confuses
me.
W> 484 /*
W> 485 * Go through hash and find our
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, blue wrote:
I have read the manual page for fast_ipsec and ipsec. However, the man page
for fast_ipsec on FreeBSD-6.1Release said currently fast_ipsec does not
support IPv6. However, I thought it could properly deal with IPv6 packets
after tracing code. Could fast_ipsec su
Hi,
Thanks for your kindly and quick response :>
I still have some questions, though...
VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:50:08PM +0800, blue wrote:
Dear all:
Hi.
I found there are two directories about PF_KEY interface: netkey and
netipsec under $FreeBSD src
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:50:08PM +0800, blue wrote:
> Dear all:
Hi.
> I found there are two directories about PF_KEY interface: netkey and
> netipsec under $FreeBSD src$\sys\.
>
> Looking into the makefile, the one that is currently used and built in
> is netkey.
>
> However, I am wonderin
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, blue wrote:
Dear all:
I found there are two directories about PF_KEY interface: netkey and netipsec
under $FreeBSD src$\sys\.
Looking into the makefile, the one that is currently used and built in is
netkey.
However, I am wondering what's the purpose for netipsec?
n
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111
> > 261 win 4380 (DF)
> > > 09:05:38.973207 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 25971
On 1 Jul, Tom Pavel wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm confused about some code dealing with the acceptance of RSTs
> in tcp_input.c. I've gleaned what I can about the history of that
> code through the CVS repository, but I'm still looking for some more
> insight. The code in question requires that a RST ha
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote:
>
> > Here is a trace to illustrate:
> >
> > 09:05:35.956066 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111
> 261 win 4380 (DF)
> > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 35685
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote:
> Here is a trace to illustrate:
>
> 09:05:35.956066 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111261 win
>4380 (DF)
> 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111261 win
>4380 (DF)
> 09:05:38.973207 AA.80 > BB.6
From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > If the reason is "Prevent icmp_reflect() from calling ip_output() with
> > a NULL route pointer which will then result in the allocated route's
> >~
> > reference count never being dec
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:47:22 +0300,
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> KAME rewrote the attached patch to improve this point:
>> - This memory leak is fixed, of course:-)
>> (at least I confirmed on 5-current).
>> - Non-NULL rtentry for ip_output() is still accepted. So onl
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:05:50PM +0900, Keiichi SHIMA / ? wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I strongly object to this change. BSD historically didn't allow for
> > ip_output() to be called with the NULL route pointer. I changed this
>
> I don't know the
Hi,
From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I strongly object to this change. BSD historically didn't allow for
> ip_output() to be called with the NULL route pointer. I changed this
I don't know the history of BSD, but, if the reason is the history
(that BSD didn't allow NULL route), I ag
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:28:11PM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> #I'm not sure where to discuss this issue. So please forward this
> #mail or reply with CC for the appropriate person or ML.
>
> > FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip Security Advisory
> >
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:25:02 -0700,
> "George V. Neville-Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 4) Will y'all continue to periodically integrate the Kame code as you v6
> solution?
At least, we (the KAME project) are willing to continue the integrate
effort. Whether or not the KAME code
> The spls have no effect any longer, we're leaving them in however
> to mark places where protection is needed, when a subsystem becomes
> MP safe the spls are removed. As far as glabals there are actually
> very few there.
OK, I'll start supping -CURRENT again.
> Interesting!
Or perhaps a fo
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010929 10:05] wrote:
> > Hopefully, there's nothing inherently bad with it that will make it
> > too difficult.
>
> Well, no more difficult than the current network stack. The number
> of global variables (at least when I was looking at the old 4.4 B
> The most signifigant changes that I can think of are:
> SMP primatives
> KSE
> FFS Snapshots
> Cardbus
>
Other than KSE (which I've only seen lately and so I don't
know what it is) SMP should be the only thing that deeply
affects the stack, at least to my currently limited knowledge.
> Hopefu
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010928 23:25] wrote:
> OK, several people said I should just send this to -net so here you are.
>
> I have a few questions about the direction and code base for the FreeBSD
> TCP/IP stack.
>
> 1) Is there a published list of "TODOs" that y'all are wo
Mike Nowlin wrote:
>
> (Looking for some general pointers to solutions here...)
>
> Just had a second DSL connection installed, and have several questions
> regarding how to map it into the FBSD router we use...
I assume this is DSL without PPPoE..
>
> The basic setup here (with just the sing
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Mike Nowlin wrote:
>
> Just had a second DSL connection installed, and have several questions
> regarding how to map it into the FBSD router we use...
>
> The basic setup here (with just the single DSL line, 32 IPs on that
> line) is DSL->Router->hosts, where DSL->Router is
56 matches
Mail list logo
