Re: Questions about ipfw's dynamic rules' dyn_keepalive

2018-07-04 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 04/03/18 12:54, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 03.04.2018 13:45, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Can anybody give any hint about the above behaviours or point me to good documentation? The man pages is very brief on this, unfortunately. Hi, ipfw uses M_SKIP_FIREWALL flag for self-generated packets.

Re: Questions about ipfw's dynamic rules' dyn_keepalive

2018-04-07 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 04/03/18 12:54, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 03.04.2018 13:45, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Can anybody give any hint about the above behaviours or point me to good documentation? The man pages is very brief on this, unfortunately. Hi, Thanks for your answer. ipfw uses M_SKIP_FIREWALL flag

Re: Questions about ipfw's dynamic rules' dyn_keepalive

2018-04-03 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 03.04.2018 13:45, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: >> Can anybody give any hint about the above behaviours or point me to good >> documentation? The man pages is very brief on this, unfortunately. > > Hi, > > ipfw uses M_SKIP_FIREWALL flag for self-generated packets. Thus > keep-alive packets are sent

Re: Questions about ipfw's dynamic rules' dyn_keepalive

2018-04-03 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 03.04.2018 13:15, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Test 3: let's introduce NAT > >> ipfw add 99 skipto 1 tcp from any to external-host http setup >> keep-state > > (skipto 1 is used to allow nat rules). > With the same external host as before, now the rule times out! > > Test 5: fwd to a ja

RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD

2018-01-23 Thread Meny Yossefi
: owner-freebsd-drivers@freebsd.orgOn Behalf OfSomayajulu, David Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 10:11:10 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik To: Meny Yossefi; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD Hi Meny, Does OFED in FreeBSD currently support

RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD

2018-01-22 Thread Somayajulu, David
Hi Meny, Does OFED in FreeBSD currently support NvMe over Fabrics ? Thanks David S. -Original Message- From: Meny Yossefi [mailto:me...@mellanox.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 5:27 AM To: Somayajulu, David ; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD Hi

RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD

2018-01-16 Thread Meny Yossefi
rsion 1.5.4 is 3.2. Just curious what 2.0+ version is ? Am I correct that HEAD supports RoCE v2 ? Thanks David S. (davi...@freebsd.org) -Original Message- From: Meny Yossefi [mailto:me...@mellanox.com] Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 2:11 AM To: Somayajulu, David ; freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subj

RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD

2018-01-15 Thread Somayajulu, David
mellanox.com] Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 2:11 AM To: Somayajulu, David ; freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD Hi David, Answers embedded below. -Meny -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On Behalf O

RE: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD

2018-01-14 Thread Meny Yossefi
Hi David, Answers embedded below. -Meny -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Somayajulu, David Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 8:08 PM To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Questions on OFED in FreeBSD Hi, 1. Is

Re: Questions on iflib

2016-05-11 Thread Chris H
On Wed, 11 May 2016 11:27:20 -0700 "K. Macy" wrote > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Chris H wrote: > > On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:25:24 -0700 hiren panchasara > > wrote > > > >> + Kip, Scott. > >> > >> On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David Somayajulu wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > I have a couple of questio

Re: Questions on iflib

2016-05-11 Thread K. Macy
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:25:24 -0700 hiren panchasara > wrote > >> + Kip, Scott. >> >> On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David Somayajulu wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > I have a couple of questions on iflib : >> > >> > 1. Are there plans to incorporate iflib i

Re: Questions on iflib

2016-05-11 Thread Chris H
On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:25:24 -0700 hiren panchasara wrote > + Kip, Scott. > > On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David Somayajulu wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have a couple of questions on iflib : > > > > 1. Are there plans to incorporate iflib into CURRENT. If yes, will it > > make it into FreeBSD11 rel

Re: Questions on iflib

2016-05-10 Thread K. Macy
; Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:31 PM > To: hiren panchasara > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; sco...@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org; > David Somayajulu > Subject: Re: Questions on iflib > > I'm waiting on erj to commit his ixl update. It will go in immediately &g

RE: Questions on iflib

2016-05-10 Thread David Somayajulu
panchasara Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; sco...@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org; David Somayajulu Subject: Re: Questions on iflib I'm waiting on erj to commit his ixl update. It will go in immediately following that with an ixgbe and ixl driver. It would have also included a bxe driver, bu

Re: Questions on iflib

2016-05-10 Thread K. Macy
I'm waiting on erj to commit his ixl update. It will go in immediately following that with an ixgbe and ixl driver. It would have also included a bxe driver, but the original bxe driver is too flaky to even test that cabling is OK and my 10GbaseT version frequently had unrecoverable dmae errors. It

Re: Questions on iflib

2016-05-10 Thread hiren panchasara
+ Kip, Scott. On 05/10/16 at 04:46P, David Somayajulu wrote: > Hi All, > I have a couple of questions on iflib : > > 1. Are there plans to incorporate iflib into CURRENT. If yes, will it > make it into FreeBSD11 release ? Yes. The library itself (without any drivers) is being prepared for

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-04-05 Thread Robert Huff
Dave Duchscher writes: > Robert Huff wrote: > >Synopsis of my (apparent) problem: DISCOVER, OFFER, REQUEST, > and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT all happen correctly ... but the information > doesn't make it to ifconfig or the routing table. > Have you tried commenting everything out of dhclient.conf?

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-04-03 Thread Dave Duchscher
On Apr 1, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Robert Huff wrote: > > Synopsis of my (apparent) problem: DISCOVER, OFFER, REQUEST, > and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT all happen correctly ... but the information > doesn't make it to ifconfig or the routing table. Have you tried commenting everything out of dhclient.conf

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-04-01 Thread Rick Miller
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Dave Duchscher wrote: > On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Rick Miller wrote: > > > > > > The conversation between a DHCP server and client consists of the initial > > DHCP DISCOVER request from the client broadcasted to the network to > which a > > DHCP ACK is expected

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-04-01 Thread Robert Huff
Dave Duchscher writes: > The description of the DHCP packet flow is incorrect. DHCP packet > flow is the following for clients requesting a new lease. Diagram > below copied from RFC 2131. For clients renewing a lease, only > the REQUEST and ACK steps are done. > > Server

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-04-01 Thread Robert Huff
Willy Offermans > Does em0 supports TSO? No: see "http://users.rcn.com/roberthuff/dhc_ifconfig";. Or at least it's not enabled. > and do you have ipfw running at the same time? Yes ... but this setup has been running with the same ipfw rules for years. The only change is the version

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-04-01 Thread Dave Duchscher
On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Rick Miller wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > >>[Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed. Thanks.] >> >>I have a system, running r263263, where dhclient is misbehaving. >> (Yes - this is CURRENT, but I have no reason

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-04-01 Thread Willy Offermans
Hello Robert, Rick and FreeBSD friends, On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 08:48:21AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > > > [Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed. Thanks.] > > > > I have a system, running r263263, where dhclient is misb

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-04-01 Thread Rick Miller
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > [Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed. Thanks.] > > I have a system, running r263263, where dhclient is misbehaving. > (Yes - this is CURRENT, but I have no reason to believe this inherently a > version-specific issue.

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-03-31 Thread Robert Huff
>> This is the relevant portion of dhclient.conf: >> >> http://users.rcn.com/dhclient.conf > > File not found ooops - try "http://users.rcn.com/roberthuff/dhclient.conf"; >> Upon execution, I get this: > >> http://users.rcn.com/roberthuff/dhcp_offer > >You're getting on

Re: questions about (system) dhclient

2014-03-31 Thread Alan Somers
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > [Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed. Thanks.] > > I have a system, running r263263, where dhclient is misbehaving. > (Yes - this is CURRENT, but I have no reason to believe this inherently a > version-specific issue. I

Re: questions about (system) dhcp

2014-03-31 Thread hiren panchasara
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Robert Huff wrote: > Hello: > Is this the correct place to ask? Yes. Cheers, Hiren ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Questions about NFS and NTFS

2010-05-17 Thread jhell
On 05/16/2010 23:21, dave jones wrote: > Hi, > > I mount ntfs partition(/dev/ad4s3) using fuse-ntfs on FreeBSD and want > to export it via NFS > with no luck: > > # mount_ntfs-3g /dev/ad4s3 /wxp > # cat /etc/exports > /wxp -alldirs -maproot=root -network 192.168.1/24 >From this I assume that the

Re: Questions on processing smaller frame size

2009-02-26 Thread Sepherosa Ziehau
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > > There is a very experimental patch to the em driver, not endorsed by the > em driver author (for unknown reasons) that some users claim helps with > SMP performance. See > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-December/020441.htm

Re: Questions on processing smaller frame size

2009-02-26 Thread Siquijor Philips
Hello Ivan, >> Try reducing the number of CPUs, it might help by reducing contention. > > Ok, I'll try. > I have tested reducing the number of CPUs but it was helpless because it causes my system to hang. Regards, Siquijor ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org m

Re: Questions on processing smaller frame size

2009-02-25 Thread Siquijor Philips
Hello Ivan, This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enig69E41D4C44B97AD296C94242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Siquijor Philips wrote: > Hello Eugene, >=20 >> Traffic bandwidth does not matter (or much less), P

Re: Questions on processing smaller frame size

2009-02-25 Thread Ivan Voras
Siquijor Philips wrote: > Hello Eugene, > >> Traffic bandwidth does not matter (or much less), PPS rate matters. >> Packets drop due to high pps rate. Higher packet size, lesser pps >> saturates link and pps just can't grow high. It can with smaller packets. >> > > All the test scenarios here are

Re: Questions on processing smaller frame size

2009-02-25 Thread Siquijor Philips
Hello Eugene, > Traffic bandwidth does not matter (or much less), PPS rate matters. > Packets drop due to high pps rate. Higher packet size, lesser pps > saturates link and pps just can't grow high. It can with smaller packets. > All the test scenarios here are bombarded with 1-Gig of network tra

Re: Questions on processing smaller frame size

2009-02-25 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:14:11PM +0800, Siquijor Philips wrote: > Can someone explain why FreeBSD network throughput (both incoming and > outgoing traffic) decreases when smaller frame size being processed? > With smaller frame size, corresponding packet rate (packet/sec or pps) > increases and

Re: questions wrt ng_netflow

2007-09-04 Thread Weiguang Shi
Thanks! That all make sense. Wei - Original Message From: Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Weiguang Shi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2007 1:51:38 AM Subject: Re: questions wrt ng_netflow Weiguang,

Re: questions wrt ng_netflow

2007-09-01 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Weiguang, sorry for late answer, I'm too loaded with daytime job. On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:40:30AM -0700, Weiguang Shi wrote: W> I've been reading netlfow.c in FreeBSD-6.2 and this piece of code confuses me. W> 484 /* W> 485 * Go through hash and find our

Re: Questions about PF_KEY interface

2007-06-25 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, blue wrote: I have read the manual page for fast_ipsec and ipsec. However, the man page for fast_ipsec on FreeBSD-6.1Release said currently fast_ipsec does not support IPv6. However, I thought it could properly deal with IPv6 packets after tracing code. Could fast_ipsec su

Re: Questions about PF_KEY interface

2007-06-25 Thread blue
Hi, Thanks for your kindly and quick response :> I still have some questions, though... VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:50:08PM +0800, blue wrote: Dear all: Hi. I found there are two directories about PF_KEY interface: netkey and netipsec under $FreeBSD src

Re: Questions about PF_KEY interface

2007-06-25 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:50:08PM +0800, blue wrote: > Dear all: Hi. > I found there are two directories about PF_KEY interface: netkey and > netipsec under $FreeBSD src$\sys\. > > Looking into the makefile, the one that is currently used and built in > is netkey. > > However, I am wonderin

Re: Questions about PF_KEY interface

2007-06-25 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, blue wrote: Dear all: I found there are two directories about PF_KEY interface: netkey and netipsec under $FreeBSD src$\sys\. Looking into the makefile, the one that is currently used and built in is netkey. However, I am wondering what's the purpose for netipsec? n

Re: questions about TCP RST validity

2002-07-02 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111 > > 261 win 4380 (DF) > > > 09:05:38.973207 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 25971

Re: questions about TCP RST validity

2002-07-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 1 Jul, Tom Pavel wrote: > > Hi. I'm confused about some code dealing with the acceptance of RSTs > in tcp_input.c. I've gleaned what I can about the history of that > code through the CVS repository, but I'm still looking for some more > insight. The code in question requires that a RST ha

Re: questions about TCP RST validity

2002-07-02 Thread Tom Pavel
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote: > > > Here is a trace to illustrate: > > > > 09:05:35.956066 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111 > 261 win 4380 (DF) > > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 35685

Re: questions about TCP RST validity

2002-07-01 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote: > Here is a trace to illustrate: > > 09:05:35.956066 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111261 win >4380 (DF) > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111261 win >4380 (DF) > 09:05:38.973207 AA.80 > BB.6

Re: Questions on ip_output.c's patch for FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip

2002-04-18 Thread Keiichi SHIMA / 島慶一
From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If the reason is "Prevent icmp_reflect() from calling ip_output() with > > a NULL route pointer which will then result in the allocated route's > >~ > > reference count never being dec

Re: Questions on ip_output.c's patch for FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip

2002-04-18 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:47:22 +0300, > Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> KAME rewrote the attached patch to improve this point: >> - This memory leak is fixed, of course:-) >> (at least I confirmed on 5-current). >> - Non-NULL rtentry for ip_output() is still accepted. So onl

Re: Questions on ip_output.c's patch for FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip

2002-04-18 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:05:50PM +0900, Keiichi SHIMA / ? wrote: > Hi, > > From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I strongly object to this change. BSD historically didn't allow for > > ip_output() to be called with the NULL route pointer. I changed this > > I don't know the

Re: Questions on ip_output.c's patch for FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip

2002-04-18 Thread Keiichi SHIMA / 島慶一
Hi, From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I strongly object to this change. BSD historically didn't allow for > ip_output() to be called with the NULL route pointer. I changed this I don't know the history of BSD, but, if the reason is the history (that BSD didn't allow NULL route), I ag

Re: Questions on ip_output.c's patch for FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip

2002-04-18 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:28:11PM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote: > Hello all, > > #I'm not sure where to discuss this issue. So please forward this > #mail or reply with CC for the appropriate person or ML. > > > FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip Security Advisory > >

Re: Questions...

2001-10-03 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:25:02 -0700, > "George V. Neville-Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > 4) Will y'all continue to periodically integrate the Kame code as you v6 > solution? At least, we (the KAME project) are willing to continue the integrate effort. Whether or not the KAME code

Re: Questions...

2001-09-29 Thread George V. Neville-Neil
> The spls have no effect any longer, we're leaving them in however > to mark places where protection is needed, when a subsystem becomes > MP safe the spls are removed. As far as glabals there are actually > very few there. OK, I'll start supping -CURRENT again. > Interesting! Or perhaps a fo

Re: Questions...

2001-09-29 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010929 10:05] wrote: > > Hopefully, there's nothing inherently bad with it that will make it > > too difficult. > > Well, no more difficult than the current network stack. The number > of global variables (at least when I was looking at the old 4.4 B

Re: Questions...

2001-09-29 Thread George V. Neville-Neil
> The most signifigant changes that I can think of are: > SMP primatives > KSE > FFS Snapshots > Cardbus > Other than KSE (which I've only seen lately and so I don't know what it is) SMP should be the only thing that deeply affects the stack, at least to my currently limited knowledge. > Hopefu

Re: Questions...

2001-09-28 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010928 23:25] wrote: > OK, several people said I should just send this to -net so here you are. > > I have a few questions about the direction and code base for the FreeBSD > TCP/IP stack. > > 1) Is there a published list of "TODOs" that y'all are wo

Re: questions re: multiple internet conn routing

2001-03-14 Thread Julian Elischer
Mike Nowlin wrote: > > (Looking for some general pointers to solutions here...) > > Just had a second DSL connection installed, and have several questions > regarding how to map it into the FBSD router we use... I assume this is DSL without PPPoE.. > > The basic setup here (with just the sing

Re: questions re: multiple internet conn routing

2001-03-05 Thread Nick Rogness
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Mike Nowlin wrote: > > Just had a second DSL connection installed, and have several questions > regarding how to map it into the FBSD router we use... > > The basic setup here (with just the single DSL line, 32 IPs on that > line) is DSL->Router->hosts, where DSL->Router is