Re: IPNAT -- Can't send file thru it with any instant messengers.....

2002-01-22 Thread veedee
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 08:35:16PM -0500, Dominic Blais wrote: > Hi! > I'm using IPNAT in order to split many local IPs over 5 external IPs. I > can receive ICQ or MSN file transfers but I can't send any of those thru > the NAT I have a friend which uses natd and he can send/receive > fil

Re: ipnat

2001-12-05 Thread veedee
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:40:16AM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote: > [This would be better on the -questions list or IPFilter list.] Sorry to be a pain in the ass, but is there a freebsd-ipfilter? haven't found any at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html Or you

Re: ipnat

2001-12-05 Thread Crist J . Clark
[This would be better on the -questions list or IPFilter list.] On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:05:10PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > -- ipnat.rules -- > map xl0 172.27.0.0/23 -> x.x.x.x/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp > map xl0 from 172.27.0.0/23 to any -> x.x.x.x/32 > -- eof -- Try, map xl

Re: ipnat

2001-12-04 Thread veedee
Thanks for your help Arjan, the 0/0 finally worked :) I was testing the connection from one of the other servers in the buildings, and the server had a real IP address not 172.27.40.0/23 still like, so ipnat was NATing for it too. But after I added "map xl0 from 172.27.0.0/23 to y.y.y.y/32 ->

Re: ipnat

2001-12-04 Thread veedee
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:18:08PM +0100, Arjan de Vet wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > ># allow everything to the another building > >add allow ip from any to 172.27.40.0/23 > >add divert natd ip from any to any via xl0 > >add allow ip from any to any > > I'm not familiar wit

Re: ipnat

2001-12-04 Thread Arjan de Vet
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: ># allow everything to the another building >add allow ip from any to 172.27.40.0/23 >add divert natd ip from any to any via xl0 >add allow ip from any to any I'm not familiar with natd but I guess this means that traffic towards 172.27.40.0/23 should no