On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:18PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> R> >R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse
> R> >R> >type.
> R> >R> >
> R> >R> H
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:35:35PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> there are some more nodes in the tree that are not in the
J> netgraph directory.
Roman already pointed me to them. This mail with small diffs is dealing with them.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
_
there are some more nodes in the tree that are not in the
netgraph directory.
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> J> > JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that
> J> > JE>> case could
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:14:45PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:18PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >R> >R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99
R> >sparse R> >R> >ty
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:18PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse
R> >R> >type.
R> >R> >
R> >R> Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:18PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse
R> >R> >type.
R> >R> >
R> >R> Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse
R> >type.
R> >
R> Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-)
Which ones? Just point me and I'll send diffs. My fingers c
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse
R> >type.
R> >
R> Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-)
Which ones? Just point me and I'll send diffs. My fingers can already convert
ng
Hi,
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
[...]
Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse type.
Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-)
rik
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> It'd be best to make the change to sparse initialisers a separate patch
J> that I cold commit separatly,
J> so reduce teh size of the functionality change patch.
... and describe this behavior in manpage.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> It'd be best to make the change to sparse initialisers a separate patch
J> that I cold commit separatly,
J> so reduce teh size of the functionality change patch.
And here is next patch, that must be applied after c99-patch. It int
As always I've forgot to attach file to previous mail. Here it is.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
? ng_ipfw.c
? ng_ipfw.h
Index: ng_UI.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netgraph/ng_UI.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
dif
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> > JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that
J> > JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs
J> > JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that case future changes
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that
> JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs
> JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that c
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that
JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs
JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that case future changes will be a good
JE>> deal easier.
JE
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:15:06AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> > JE>> So, what about adding one more netgraph method into struct ng_type, say
J> > JE>> ng_preshutdown_t? This method is called first in ng_rmnode(), and then
J> > JE>> current shutdown sequence is followed. We will set it to N
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Harti Brandt wrote:
>
> [Sorry, I just deleted the original mail, so I use Julian's to answer]
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> JE>On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> JE>
> JE>> So, what about adding one more netgraph method into struct ng_typ
[Sorry, I just deleted the original mail, so I use Julian's to answer]
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
JE>On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
JE>
JE>> So, what about adding one more netgraph method into struct ng_type, say
JE>> ng_preshutdown_t? This method is called first in
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hi collegues,
>
> I'm again with the issue about node destruction process. If you
> already forgot the problem, I'll remind you: in RELENG_4 node cuts down
> all its hooks itself from shutdown method, while in HEAD it is done
> in ng_rmnode() _be
19 matches
Mail list logo
