Stefan Lambrev пишет:
Hi Vladimir,
[skip]
I'm unable to get this driver working under releng_7_0. It builds
without problems but panic my machine when I load it.
May be I'll wait until you have official version for FreeBSD 7.0 or
changes get merged into Intel's driver :)
We've
Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hi, Stefan
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Will http://people.yandex-team.ru/~wawa/em-6.7.3-yandex-1.28.tar.gz
work out of the box on FreeBSD 7, or it's just for 6.X?
We use (and debug) it w/RELENG_6. I seem it can be used w/CURRENT but
I didn't test
Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hi, Stefan
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Will http://people.yandex-team.ru/~wawa/em-6.7.3-yandex-1.28.tar.gz
work out of the box on FreeBSD 7, or it's just for 6.X?
We use (and debug) it w/RELENG_6. I seem it can be used w/CURRENT but
I didn't test
Hi Vladimir,
Will http://people.yandex-team.ru/~wawa/em-6.7.3-yandex-1.28.tar.gz work
out of the box on FreeBSD 7, or it's just for 6.X?
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Privet, Alexandr
Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Vladimir Ivanov!
[skip]
Which of newest versions should I use in RELENG_6_X
]
To: Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: SMPable version of EM driver
Hi Vladimir,
Will http://people.yandex-team.ru/~wawa/em-6.7.3-yandex-1.28.tar.gz work
out of the box on FreeBSD 7, or it's just for 6.X
Hi, Stefan
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Will http://people.yandex-team.ru/~wawa/em-6.7.3-yandex-1.28.tar.gz
work out of the box on FreeBSD 7, or it's just for 6.X?
We use (and debug) it w/RELENG_6. I seem it can be used w/CURRENT but I
didn't test it yet.
Also, pls use 1.30 revision
Privet, Alexandr
Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Vladimir Ivanov!
[skip]
Which of newest versions should I use in RELENG_6_X now?
Let you try http://people.yandex-team.ru/wawa/em-6.7.3-yandex-1.28.tar.gz.
We keep code synced with latest RELENG_6.
Latest feature: I have start to move
Hello, Vladimir Ivanov!
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:31:31PM +0400, you wrote:
LI Xin wrote:
Shoot, the TX mutex locking and unlocking should not belong here. Let
me check the code.
Cheers,
Don't forget: our latest version
http://people.yandex-team.ru/wawa/em-6.6.6-yandex-1.20.tar.gz
Hi,
LI Xin wrote:
Shoot, the TX mutex locking and unlocking should not belong here. Let
me check the code.
Cheers,
Don't forget: our latest version
http://people.yandex-team.ru/wawa/em-6.6.6-yandex-1.20.tar.gz is very
close to CURRENT.
Also, you can alter threads' number runtime in this
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
LI Xin wrote:
Shoot, the TX mutex locking and unlocking should not belong here. Let
me check the code.
Cheers,
Don't forget: our latest version
http://people.yandex-team.ru/wawa/em-6.6.6-yandex-1.20.tar.gz is very
close to CURRENT.
Also, you can alter
Hi Xin,
LI Xin wrote:
Hi Valdimir and Jack,
I have ported Valdimir's 1.16 revision of their driver to -CURRENT code
as of today, but I don't have a box that is suitable for testing right
now as I just moved, and the server I used to do FreeBSD coding stuff is
located several thousand miles
Karl Triebes wrote:
Vladamir,
interesting work. Do you have performance numbers with each of your
changes to see how much each contributed? How does this method scale
with cpu cores. With your multiple RX thread idea, do you think there
will a lot of cache thrashing due to fact that now 1
Hi,
Mike Tancsa wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:26:10 +0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote:
[skip]
What type of performance differences are you seeing with these
changes? Is this with FreeBSD acting as a router/firewall, or purely
RX queue is
Hi,
LI Xin wrote:
Hi Valdimir and Jack,
I have ported Valdimir's 1.16 revision of their driver to -CURRENT code
as of today, but I don't have a box that is suitable for testing right
now as I just moved, and the server I used to do FreeBSD coding stuff is
located several thousand miles away
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
LI Xin wrote:
Hi Valdimir and Jack,
I have ported Valdimir's 1.16 revision of their driver to -CURRENT code
as of today, but I don't have a box that is suitable for testing right
now as I just moved, and the server I used to do FreeBSD coding stuff is
located
rmkml wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
very thank for your work on intel em driver !
just commented line 772 and added 773 :
771:/* Send a copy of the frame to the BPF listener */
772:/* ETHER_BPF_MTAP(ifp, m_head); */
773:BPF_MTAP(ifp, m_head);
what is ETHER_BPF_MTAP() ?
, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:59:51 +0400
From: Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rmkml [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-net@freebsd.org
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SMPable version of EM driver
rmkml wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
very thank for your work on intel em driver
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Main improvement of this version: driver does not use TX interrupts
at all. So, interrupt rate reduced significantly.
Polling for anything is a bug IMO. Buggy hardware may work better
with it,
but em is not buggy :-).
The
Hi Valdimir and Jack,
I have ported Valdimir's 1.16 revision of their driver to -CURRENT code
as of today, but I don't have a box that is suitable for testing right
now as I just moved, and the server I used to do FreeBSD coding stuff is
located several thousand miles away :-)
I hope that this
Hi,
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 8/1/07, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've just published revision of EM (mainstream RELENG_6 version w/patch)
driver which is being used in our company to increase network
performance. The main benefit - significantly better SMP utilization.
I'm sorry I have not been able to get to this yet, but putting
food on the table comes first so the FreeBSD work that
Intel pays me for has to come first. Also your driver work
is based on a version that is too old to just accept, I am
hoping to get the STABLE tree converted to the new
shared code
Jack Vogel wrote:
I'm sorry I have not been able to get to this yet, but putting
food on the table comes first so the FreeBSD work that
Intel pays me for has to come first. Also your driver work
is based on a version that is too old to just accept, I am
hoping to get the STABLE tree converted to
On 10/2/07, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
I'm sorry I have not been able to get to this yet, but putting
food on the table comes first so the FreeBSD work that
Intel pays me for has to come first. Also your driver work
is based on a version that is too old to
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Main improvement of this version: driver does not use TX interrupts at all.
So, interrupt rate reduced significantly.
Polling for anything is a bug IMO. Buggy hardware may work better with it,
but em is not buggy :-).
For bge, I tune the interrupt
Hi,
I've just published revision of EM (mainstream RELENG_6 version w/patch)
driver which is being used in our company to increase network
performance. The main benefit - significantly better SMP utilization.
http://people.yandex-team.ru/~wawa/em-6.2.9-yandex.tar.gz.
The driver should be
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
I've just published revision of EM (mainstream RELENG_6 version
w/patch) driver which is being used in our company to increase network
performance. The main benefit - significantly better SMP utilization.
http://people.yandex-team.ru/~wawa/em-6.2.9-yandex.tar.gz.
26 matches
Mail list logo
