The per socket method is used at a large commercial CDN
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:30 AM vm finance wrote:
> Ok - I see there is a socket option to pick a different cc per-socket
> basis.
> Any experiences on loading / using different cc per socket...does it work
> seamlessly?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:29:50PM -0700, vm finance wrote:
> Ok - I see there is a socket option to pick a different cc per-socket
> basis.
> Any experiences on loading / using different cc per socket...does it work
> seamlessly?
I have not heard of any problems and have happily done recently:
Ok - I see there is a socket option to pick a different cc per-socket
basis.
Any experiences on loading / using different cc per socket...does it work
seamlessly?
Thanks!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:19 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Have you loaded kernel modules for other algorithms? I believe
Have you loaded kernel modules for other algorithms? I believe only newreno
is in the default kernel. "man 4 mod_cc" for available modules and other
information.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint:
Hi,
We can set per-socket congestion control under Linux, but not under FreeBSD
(12.0).
The current available and allowed is only newReno:
net.inet.tcp.cc.available: newreno
net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm: newreno
Any thoughts on why FreeBSD chose not to allow different cc to be set per
socket?
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:27:51 pm Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 01/25/13 01:12, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 24.01.2013 14:28, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 01/16/13 06:27, John Baldwin wrote:
One other thing I noticed which is may or may not be odd during this,
is that
if you have a
On 01/16/13 06:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:29:51 am Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi John,
On 01/15/13 08:04, John Baldwin wrote:
I was looking at TCP congestion control at work recently and noticed a few
Poor you ;)
odd things in the current code. First
On 24.01.2013 14:28, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 01/16/13 06:27, John Baldwin wrote:
One other thing I noticed which is may or may not be odd during this, is that
if you have a connection with TCP_NODELAY enabled and you fill your cwnd and
then you get an ACK back for an earlier small segment
On 01/25/13 01:12, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 24.01.2013 14:28, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 01/16/13 06:27, John Baldwin wrote:
One other thing I noticed which is may or may not be odd during this,
is that
if you have a connection with TCP_NODELAY enabled and you fill your
cwnd and
then you
Hi John,
On 01/15/13 08:04, John Baldwin wrote:
I was looking at TCP congestion control at work recently and noticed a few
Poor you ;)
odd things in the current code. First, there is this chunk of code in
cc_ack_received() in tcp_input.c:
static void inline
cc_ack_received(struct
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:29:51 am Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi John,
On 01/15/13 08:04, John Baldwin wrote:
I was looking at TCP congestion control at work recently and noticed a few
Poor you ;)
odd things in the current code. First, there is this chunk of code
I was looking at TCP congestion control at work recently and noticed a few
odd things in the current code. First, there is this chunk of code in
cc_ack_received() in tcp_input.c:
static void inline
cc_ack_received(struct tcpcb *tp, struct tcphdr *th, uint16_t type)
{
INP_WLOCK_ASSERT
Hi all,
We've been involved in a research project to implement and test an
emerging TCP congestion control algorithm under FreeBSD. As a part of
this, we've put together a patch for FreeBSD 7.0-BETA4 that modularises
the congestion control code in the TCP stack. It allows for new
congestion
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi all,
We've been involved in a research project to implement and test an
emerging TCP congestion control algorithm under FreeBSD. As a part of
this, we've put together a patch for FreeBSD 7.0-BETA4 that modularises
the congestion control code in the TCP stack
Rui Paulo
At Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:55:20 +0100,
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi all,
We've been involved in a research project to implement and test an
emerging TCP congestion control algorithm under FreeBSD. As a part of
this, we've put together a patch for FreeBSD 7.0
Thanks to each of you.
On Dec 18, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi all,
We've been involved in a research project to implement and test an
emerging TCP congestion control algorithm under FreeBSD. As a part of
this, we've put together a patch for FreeBSD 7.0
16 matches
Mail list logo
