Re: can't bridge an I/F with jumbo to taps, deleted bridge 'flags' are sticky if you remake them

On 17 Jan 2022, at 6:09, George Michaelson wrote: > I tested on FreeBSD 13 and the behaviour is the same. > > But, I want to withdraw an imputation this is a bug. The underlying > behaviour is that you can't bond an MTU9000 and an MTU1500 interface. > If the base device is set jumbo, then the tapX

Re: can't bridge an I/F with jumbo to taps, deleted bridge 'flags' are sticky if you remake them

I tested on FreeBSD 13 and the behaviour is the same. But, I want to withdraw an imputation this is a bug. The underlying behaviour is that you can't bond an MTU9000 and an MTU1500 interface. If the base device is set jumbo, then the tapX instances must be set jumbo. once you set MTU to match, it

Re: can't bridge an I/F with jumbo to taps, deleted bridge 'flags' are sticky if you remake them

Hi all, > Am 13.01.2022 um 06:41 schrieb George Michaelson : > > I just found a couple of odd quirks in bridge > > 1) you can't bridge an MTU 9000 interface to taps. If you dial it back > to 1500 it works fine. I might have missed this being a limit in the > man > > 2) when you delete a

can't bridge an I/F with jumbo to taps, deleted bridge 'flags' are sticky if you remake them

I just found a couple of odd quirks in bridge 1) you can't bridge an MTU 9000 interface to taps. If you dial it back to 1500 it works fine. I might have missed this being a limit in the man 2) when you delete a bridge, and re-create it, some of the addm "history" can come live. faulty debug