On 11 April 2014 05:58, Dennis Yusupoff d...@smartspb.net wrote:
NAT realized with pf nat, shaping with ipfw dummynet and traffic
accounting with ng_netflow via ipfw ng_tee.
Good time, Dennis.
May I ask how much clients do you nat, shape and account?
Why you do that with both engines (pf +
Good day, gurus!
We have a servers on the FreeBSD. They do NAT, shaping and traffic
accounting for our home (mainly) customers.
NAT realized with pf nat, shaping with ipfw dummynet and traffic
accounting with ng_netflow via ipfw ng_tee.
The problem is performance on (relatively) high traffic.
On
Hi,
I had similar problem on the past and it turned to be the ammount of rules
in ipfe.
Using reduced subset with tables actually reduced the load.
Sami
בתאריך יום שישי, 11 באפריל 2014, Dennis Yusupoff d...@smartspb.net כתב:
Good day, gurus!
We have a servers on the FreeBSD. They do NAT,
