Re: getaddrinfo() and PF_LOCAL

2001-08-03 Thread Assar Westerlund
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: we can probably try it out (if it seems really necessary for us) on KAME tree, but not on *BSD-current nor *BSD official releases. I believe one of the intended uses of this would be for telnet/rpcbind, so I think it would really have to go into

Re: getaddrinfo() and PF_LOCAL

2001-08-03 Thread itojun
we had a local discussion within KAME. we do not really like to support PF_LOCAL, unless there's clear standard behavior for AF_LOCAL case. I think this is the wrong approach. If we're always going to wait for a clear and standarized behaviour of something before implementing