rpokala-panasas.com added a comment.
! In D1986#4, @ae wrote:
Just a thought. Imagine two interfaces, one has maximum MTU 2200, another
1500. lagg0 has MTU 1400.
Two threads invokes changing MTU in the same time. One wants to change it to
2000, another - to 1500.
It is possible, that when
rstone added a comment.
RLOCK only gets a read lock. You want WLOCK to get a write lock to ensure
serialization.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1986
To: rpokala-panasas.com, rstone
Cc: ae, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
rstone added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
sys/net/if_lagg.c:1772 style(9) says to not include unnecessary braces (which
I personally disagree with, but what can you do?)
sys/net/if_lagg.c:1773 style(9): put brackets around the return value:
return (0);
sys/net/if_lagg.c:1811 I
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197997
--- Comment #2 from Lev A. Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org ---
(In reply to eugen from comment #1)
No :( It is NanoBSD system without any space for crashump with autoreboot.
Only thing I have is posted panic message from dmesg buffer.
I
ae added a subscriber: ae.
ae added a comment.
Just a thought. Imagine two interfaces, one has maximum MTU 2200, another 1500.
lagg0 has MTU 1400.
Two threads invokes changing MTU in the same time. One wants to change it to
2000, another - to 1500.
It is possible, that when both threads will
jch accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1982
To: harrison.grundy-astrodoggroup.com, gnn, adrian, jch
Cc: freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/30/15 13:11, Sean Bruno wrote:
http://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/82574l-gbe-controller-datasheet.pdf
According to 7.1.11, this device does indeed have 2 queues for
stuff and or things. So, basic RSS would be possible in
emaste added a subscriber: emaste.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1986
To: rpokala-panasas.com, rstone
Cc: emaste, ae, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
ae added a comment.
! In D1986#7, @rstone wrote:
RLOCK only gets a read lock. You want WLOCK to get a write lock to ensure
serialization.
Also we can use another lock in the lagg_ioctl, that will prevent simultaneous
MTU changing.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1986
To:
mike-karels.net added a subscriber: mike-karels.net.
BRANCH
/head
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1965
To: erj, adrian, jfvogel, gnn
Cc: mike-karels.net, glebius, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
mike-karels.net added a comment.
! In D1965#11, @gnn wrote:
BTW Mike Karels was in favor of this in an email thread. He's not yet on
phabricator but I'll ask him here as well.
Agreed, with minor exceptions. Given the ixl changes, I don't think the vtnet
example is worth keeping, and I think
connect(), in both the man page and under POSIX is documented to only
return EINVAL for invalid lengths of the namelen parameter, which is a
fatal error.
As it stands now, it will also return EINVAL when called on TIMEWAIT
or DROPPED sockets.
The patch at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1982
harrison.grundy-astrodoggroup.com added a subscriber: freebsd-net.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1982
To: harrison.grundy-astrodoggroup.com, jch, gnn, adrian
Cc: freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
