Re: What does adapter-stats.mpc[] report for ixgbe?

2012-05-08 Thread Vijay Singh
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Juli is correct, the FIFO is not partitioned by the driver queues as they exist in the current driver, its only seperated into the 3 parts I mentioned. I am running ixgbe code from 8.1, and IXGBE_FDIR isn't defined, so is the

Re: What does adapter-stats.mpc[] report for ixgbe?

2012-05-08 Thread Jack Vogel
No, that's just standard setup stuff for MSIX. Jack On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Vijay Singh vijju.si...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Juli is correct, the FIFO is not partitioned by the driver queues as they exist in the current

Re: 82574L hangs (with r233708 e1000 driver).

2012-05-08 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:44:57PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, May 04, 2012 6:18:19 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:30:22AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:21:21 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:38:49PM

OFED stack, RDMA, ipoib help needed

2012-05-08 Thread Gergely CZUCZY
Hello, I'd like to ask a few question in order to get some hardware to work we've got recently. The hardwares are the following: - 2x dualport Mellanox ConnectX-3 VPI cards, with 56Gbps ports - 4 computing modules with a singleport Mellanox MT27500-family ConnectX-3 port. The 2 dualport

Re: OFED stack, RDMA, ipoib help needed

2012-05-08 Thread Rick Macklem
Gergely CZUCZY wrote: Hello, I'd like to ask a few question in order to get some hardware to work we've got recently. The hardwares are the following: - 2x dualport Mellanox ConnectX-3 VPI cards, with 56Gbps ports - 4 computing modules with a singleport Mellanox MT27500-family

Re: OFED stack, RDMA, ipoib help needed

2012-05-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 5/8/12 6:11 AM, Gergely CZUCZY wrote: As a side question, I've seen a comming for OFED in HEAD by jhb, fixing a few things, may I ask when will that get MFC'd to RELENG-9? Unfortunately I do not know enough about OFED/IB to help with your other questions. So far my only personal experience

Re: [CFT] Ralink RT2860, RT2870, RT3060, RT3090 support

2012-05-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Bernhard Schmidt bschm...@freebsd.org wrote: Please apply attached patch (also here [1]) on top of the first one, it fixes channel switching for = 3070 (called the wrong function, doh..) as well as a bgscan issue. [1]

Plea for bwn maintenance.

2012-05-08 Thread Adam Vande More
I would like to call attention to PR's: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/149786 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/156327 I am experiencing roughly the same problems, and there are also relatively consistent reports of similar issues on the forums and various mailing

Controlling queue delays

2012-05-08 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Here is a recent paper that revisits active queue management. http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2209336 might be interesting for those involved in TCP cong.control, traffic schedulers (ok, that includes me!) and the network stack in general cheers luigi

Re: Plea for bwn maintenance.

2012-05-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote: .. If someone would like to tackle this, I can provide access to the hardware or I will donate the card to the person. Whatever works. I'll get into bwn(4)/bwi(4) and probably also the newer cards, which require yet

Re: Controlling queue delays

2012-05-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote: Here is a recent paper that revisits active queue management. http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2209336 might be interesting for those involved in TCP cong.control, traffic schedulers (ok, that includes me!) and the

Re: igb(4) Pondering a bind to cpu patch

2012-05-08 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 15:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:30 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 06:32 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: CPU IDs are not guaranteed to be dense. However, you can use CPU_FIRST() and CPU_NEXT() with your static global instead.