On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:53:59PM +0100, Tom Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:29:44PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
Cool! Would you mind throwing it into a bugzilla ticket so it's not
lost and it can be assigned for some review?
http://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/
Done.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191520
--- Comment #1 from Tom Jones jo...@sdf.org ---
Created attachment 145214
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145214action=edit
Updated NewCWV patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191520
--- Comment #2 from Tom Jones jo...@sdf.org ---
Comment on attachment 145214
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145214
Updated NewCWV patch
Updated the patch to move the NewCWV into a struct within tcpcb
--
You are
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:19:20PM +0100, Tom Jones wrote:
I have updated the patch to move the new variable introduced with newcwv into
a
struct within the tcpcb.
Forgot some files in the diff.
--
Tom | I don't see how we are going to build the dystopian megapoli
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191520
--- Comment #3 from Tom Jones jo...@sdf.org ---
Created attachment 145216
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145216action=edit
Updated NewCWV patch
Move NewCWV state into a struct within tcpcb
--
You are receiving
Hi!
This is looking better!
Structurally though, I'd look at all those places where you only
update tp-newcv and instead of passing in the tp, pass in a pointer
to tp-newcv. That way you're keeping a lid on the scope of the helper
functions - they only get access to as much data as they need so
Hello all.
I'm currently working on to enhance ipfw in some areas.
The most notable (and user-visible) change is named table support.
The other one is support for different lookup algorithms for different
key types.
For example, new ipfw permits writing this:
ipfw table tb1 create type cidr
On 8/2/14, 5:08 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
Hello all.
I'm currently working on to enhance ipfw in some areas.
The most notable (and user-visible) change is named table support.
The other one is support for different lookup algorithms for different
key types.
For example, new ipfw
