On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Kristof Provost k...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Some of you may have noticed that I fixed a couple of pf issues (or in
some cases broke things. Sorry Allan.) recently.
Here's a quick list of my current priorities:
- PR 127042, 202178:
This is a panic when
Hi,
I have 10.2-STABLE, 2 CPU Intel E5-2643v3, network Intel XL710 with
1.4.0 driver from Intel
I know that going through routing table is very fast (rn_match). But I
decided to optimize routing table.
I'm using 2 interfaces - ixl0 and ixl1.
Behind ixl0 I have 304 networks 172.16.. from /28
for you
25.08.2015, 17:46, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org:
On 8/25/15 10:07 PM, Evgeny Khorokhorin wrote:
Hi,
I have 10.2-STABLE, 2 CPU Intel E5-2643v3, network Intel XL710 with
1.4.0 driver from Intel
I know that going through routing table is very fast (rn_match). But
I decided to
On 8/25/15 10:07 PM, Evgeny Khorokhorin wrote:
Hi,
I have 10.2-STABLE, 2 CPU Intel E5-2643v3, network Intel XL710 with
1.4.0 driver from Intel
I know that going through routing table is very fast (rn_match). But
I decided to optimize routing table.
I'm using 2 interfaces - ixl0 and ixl1.
On Aug 24, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Daniel Braniss wrote:
On 24 Aug 2015, at 10:22, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 08/24/15 01:02, Rick Macklem wrote:
The other thing is the degradation seems to cut the rate by about half
each time.
John-Mark,
Thank you for your reply.
On 8/25/15 6:03 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Chris Stankevitz wrote this message on Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 15:47 -0700:
# cat /dev/urandom | ssh root@host 'cat /dev/null'
Don't use this for testing... use /dev/zero or some other device
that can produce
Hi,
I've made some minor modifications to the patch from Rick, and made this
review:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3477
--HPS
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any
Not yet; I think I will be able to get to it soon.
- Eric
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:09 AM Evgeny Khorokhorin j...@maxnet.ru wrote:
Hi Eric,
Did you manage to try this problem?
- Evgeny
19.08.2015 23:16, Eric Joyner пишет:
Yeah; it should be able to do up to 64 queues for the PF's.
On 8/25/15 4:11 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 25 Aug 2015, at 22:47 , Chris Stankevitz ch...@stankevitz.com wrote:
Can anyone recommend some tools/tricks to figure out what in FreeBSD and/or
base SSH is limiting the send/recv buffer and/or TCP window?
if you have the memory, try these
Hi,
# cat /dev/urandom | ssh root@host 'cat /dev/null'
I use the above ssh command over a high-BDP WAN link (80 ms @ 100 Mbps).
tcpdump shows I am TCP window limited to 64 KBytes (yielding 5 Mbps).
iperf with default options gets the window opened to 500 KBytes
(yielding 35 Mbps).
Both
On 25 Aug 2015, at 22:47 , Chris Stankevitz ch...@stankevitz.com wrote:
Hi,
# cat /dev/urandom | ssh root@host 'cat /dev/null'
I use the above ssh command over a high-BDP WAN link (80 ms @ 100 Mbps).
tcpdump shows I am TCP window limited to 64 KBytes (yielding 5 Mbps). iperf
with
Chris Stankevitz wrote this message on Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 15:47 -0700:
# cat /dev/urandom | ssh root@host 'cat /dev/null'
Don't use this for testing... use /dev/zero or some other device
that can produce data faster than this...
I use the above ssh command over a high-BDP WAN link (80 ms @
13 matches
Mail list logo
