Re: ixl 40G bad performance?

Hi, On 2015-10-20, at 10:24, Ian Smith wrote: > Actually, you want to set hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1 instead. Done. On 2015-10-19, at 17:55, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote: >> The only other

Re: ixl 40G bad performance?

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:47:36 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I suspect it might not touch the c states, but better check. The safest is > > disable them in the bios. > > > > To disable C-States: > sysctl dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest=C1 Actually, you want to set hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1 instead.

Re: Question on mbufs

On Friday, October 16, 2015 05:56:33 PM David Somayajulu wrote: > Hi All, > When indicating a chain of mbufs to the network via ifp->if_input(), what are > the repercussions of setting M_PKTHDR bit in all the mbufs in the chain, > instead of just the first mbuf ? > Thanks > David S. Right now

netgraph snooping failing using tcpdump with ng_tee and ng_eiface

I'm in the process of trying to debug a deeper question with netgraph, but am puzzled as to why I can't seem to use tcpdump with ng_tee and ng_eiface. I don't see any packets with tcpdump on either the ng_eiface connected to ng_tee left2right or to ng_tee right2left when there are packets flowing

Re: ixl 40G bad performance?

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Eggert, Lars wrote: Hi, On 2015-10-20, at 10:24, Ian Smith wrote: Actually, you want to set hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1 instead. Done. On 2015-10-19, at 17:55, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Eggert, Lars

Re: Some MSI are not routed correctly

Here you go: $ sudo procstat -S 11 PIDTID COMM TDNAME CPU CSID CPU MASK 11 100026 intr swi3: vm 01 0-23 11 100027 intr swi4: clock01 0-23 11 100028 intr swi4: clock01 0-23 11 100029