Re: tcp between tap interfaces

On 11/12/2016 07:54, dkle...@phy.ucsf.edu wrote: I'm trying to setup a private testing environment using the bhyve hypervisor and some virtual machines connected with tap interfaces to a bridge. My network configuration for this environment looks like this: I have a bridge interface with 5 tap

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 Alan Somers changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #9 from jhujh...@adjectivism.org --- Created attachment 178192 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=178192=edit Respect net.add_addr_allfibs=0 for inet6 (revision 1) I didn't forget about this! I

Re: cxgbe's native netmap support broken since r307394

Hi Luigi, I attached a minimal change containing two fixes: - change IFNET_WLOCK into IFNET_RLOCK, to fix the cxgbe issue related to this thread - use the proper locking functions for the "worker_lock", unrelated but needed to avoid the O.S. to trap because of a mismatch between MTX_SPIN and

[Bug 213115] ifconfig ipfw create inside a VNET jail leads to kernel Panic

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213115 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open --- Comment

Re: cxgbe's native netmap support broken since r307394

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Vincenzo Maffione wrote: > Hi, > There is no commit related to that in the FreeBSD svn or git. > > The fix has been published to the github netmap repository here > (branch master): https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap > > What we should

Re: cxgbe's native netmap support broken since r307394

Hi, There is no commit related to that in the FreeBSD svn or git. The fix has been published to the github netmap repository here (branch master): https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap What we should do is to import all the recent updates from the github into HEAD. I can prepare a patch for

qualified vale(4) uplink interface clones

Dear netmap gurus, I'm getting different crashes if using vale(4) as a drop in replacement for if_bridge(4). Before collecting dumps I'd like to know if the setup, which I need to keep (including a MTU of 9000 bytes), is meant to be supported at all with netmap. Usually I have two GbE ports

[Bug 212283] oversized IP datagrams on raw socket with IP_RAWOUTPUT hang network interface drivers

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212283 --- Comment #19 from Mathieu Arnold --- Still a problem with 11.0-RELEASE-p5. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___