On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 3:56 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
> I know some people have done this.. anyone have pointers?
>
>
>
Hi Julian,
libuinet: https://github.com/pkelsey/libuinet
A presentation about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhIx8q8_7YY
___
I know some people have done this.. anyone have pointers?
Julian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231192
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231192
Navdeep Parhar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231192
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
Bjoern A. Zeeb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
--- Comment #14 from Bjoern A. Zeeb ---
Ok,
trying to summarise to get the exact case right as the suggested patch looks
not quite right. There are too many (corner) cases to consider.
two jails, same single IP address.
In each jail a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
Michael Tuexen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tue...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
--- Comment #12 from David King ---
missed a zero on net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast: 52000
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
--- Comment #11 from David King ---
Not a script as such, however, to reproduce i create 2 jails with same IP,
reduce the ephemeral port range to increase the probability of hitting the
issue
net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst: 51000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
--- Comment #10 from Bjoern A. Zeeb ---
Stupid question: can someone write the short test case for this to reproduce
the problem?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@freebsd.org,
So, the system semi hung again ctrl + alt + F(n) only thing that was
working. :-(
On 9/4/18 6:08 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
04.09.2018 23:57, Ryan Moeller wrote:
The NIC's are Intel based using igb kernel driver:
igb0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 9000
options=6403bb
I see your MTU is
Hi Bjoern,
I’m running into an issue with vnet shutdown. It manifests
consistently with pfsync, but if I understand the problem fully it’s
not really related to pfsync.
The issue is that we end up with a use-after-free of the struct ifnet of
the pfsync interface.
When the jail shuts down
Il giorno gio 6 set 2018 alle ore 08:35 Marko Zec ha scritto:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:42:06 -0700
> John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> > Marko Zec wrote this message on Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 12:47 +0200:
> > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 12:36:38 +0200
> > > Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Marko,
> >
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:42:06 -0700
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Marko Zec wrote this message on Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 12:47 +0200:
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 12:36:38 +0200
> > Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Marko,
> > > Thanks a lot for identifying the problem.
> > > If I understand
17 matches
Mail list logo
