> El mié., 26 sept. 2018 a las 18:51, David Cornejo ()
> escribió:.
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure how willing the upstream is to support FreeBSD is either,
>> so, as George said, a port will be tedious to create, but also onerous
>> to maintain. Not saying we shouldn't, but hoping some masochists come
David,
Thanks for the reply and I concur with your thoughts. You mentioned that
you have managed to compile it under FreeBSD; were you able to test if it
was working performance wise? If so, do you have any documentation around
about your approach so we can maybe start pulling something out and
There is some curiosity in this at Netgate (my employer), but I have
it as a free-time project, and there has not been a lot of this.
The good news is that FreeBSD is a supported DPDK target, and I have
seen compatibility patches being accepted. So that's a promising
start.
I have gotten parts
So, a straight up port is possible but tedious (duh) due to its
Linuxism. I think someone else may have taken this up after I stopped
working on it, so let's see if anyone else replies.
Best,
George
On 26 Sep 2018, at 11:04, Jordan Caraballo wrote:
Hi George,
I am mainly interested in
Hi George,
I am mainly interested in using it in combination with DPDK over FreeBSD
for routing purposes.
If you have suggestions over possibly hacking it to make it available for
FreeBSD, or to continue your work, I am more than willing to get advice.
This might be a worth to-do thing in the
Indeed I have not had
On 26 Sep 2018, at 8:37, Jordan Caraballo wrote:
Hi guys,
I am wondering about the status of patching VPP for FreeBSD. I saw
that
George Neville-Neil started some work:
https://github.com/gvnn3/vpp-old/tree/freebsd, but it is outdated
(last
commit was 2 years ago).
Hi guys,
I am wondering about the status of patching VPP for FreeBSD. I saw that
George Neville-Neil started some work:
https://github.com/gvnn3/vpp-old/tree/freebsd, but it is outdated (last
commit was 2 years ago).
Is this a near future plan? Do you have ongoing projects working with this?
