On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:06:50PM +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote:
M> > I'm talking about statistics that I recently committed to CURRENT only:
M> >
M> > # netstat -sp tcp | grep TIME-WAIT
M> >3 times connection in TIME-WAIT responded with ACK
M> >0 times connection in TIME-WAIT was
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:11:09PM +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote:
M> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:30:10AM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
M> > T> Sorry, the stats I was talking about are present in CURRENT only:
M> > T>
M> > T> netstat -sp tcp | grep TIME-WAIT
M> > T> 3 times connection in
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:30:10AM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> T> Sorry, the stats I was talking about are present in CURRENT only:
Yeah, sorry, I saw your other post about that after posting mine.
> Sorry, I actually can't merge it to stable, as it changes size of
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:30:10AM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> Sorry, the stats I was talking about are present in CURRENT only:
T>
T> netstat -sp tcp | grep TIME-WAIT
T> 3 times connection in TIME-WAIT responded with ACK
T> 0 times connection in TIME-WAIT was actively recycled
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 06:25:06PM +, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
J> > modern HTTP server can be lowered 3 times more. Feel free to lower
J> > net.inet.tcp.msl and do your own measurements with
J> > 'netstat -sp tcp | grep TIME-WAIT'. I'd be glad to see your results.
J>
J> Without
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> modern HTTP server can be lowered 3 times more. Feel free to lower
> net.inet.tcp.msl and do your own measurements with
> 'netstat -sp tcp | grep TIME-WAIT'. I'd be glad to see your results.
Without changing net.inet.tcp.msl I get:
| 18:18 (46.0°C 1100) (2)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260393
Gleb Smirnoff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gleb...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:16:09PM -0800, Chris wrote:
C> > * Who told that 2*MSL (60 seconds) is adequate time to keep TIME-WAIT?
C> > In 71d2d5adfe1 I added some stats on usage of tcptw and experimented a
bit
C> > with lowering net.inet.tcp.msl. It appeared that lowering it down three
C> >
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:01:51PM -0500, George Neville-Neil wrote:
G> > * Who told that 2*MSL (60 seconds) is adequate time to keep TIME-WAIT?
G> > In 71d2d5adfe1 I added some stats on usage of tcptw and experimented a
bit
G> > with lowering net.inet.tcp.msl. It appeared that lowering it
Hi all,
> Am 13.01.2022 um 06:41 schrieb George Michaelson :
>
> I just found a couple of odd quirks in bridge
>
> 1) you can't bridge an MTU 9000 interface to taps. If you dial it back
> to 1500 it works fine. I might have missed this being a limit in the
> man
>
> 2) when you delete a
10 matches
Mail list logo
