https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184311
Stephen Hurd sh...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sh...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184311
Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184311
--- Comment #5 from Stephen Hurd sh...@freebsd.org ---
Both of the log bits in the reports contained the lines:
bge0: CHIP ID 0x4101; ASIC REV 0x04; CHIP REV 0x41; PCI-E
miibus1: MII bus on bge0
brgphy0: BCM5750 1000BASE-T media
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175734
Kevin Lo ke...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@freebsd.org
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175734
Nick Hibma n_hi...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Timeout |In Discussion
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #9 from pataki.an...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #7)
Please attach:
* /var/run/dmesg.boot output
* pciconf pciconf -lveV
Hi!
I am so sorry, but we didn't kept the unusable system from 2013
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #10 from pataki.an...@gmail.com ---
Like my previous reply, I can't confirm this, because we workarounded the bug
in a way.
(upgraded to freebsd 9.2-stable and the emulex cards are changed to intel x520
cards)
I am so sorry, we
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #12 from bor...@sarenet.es ---
I've compiled the latest driver supplied by Emulex.
Jun 18 17:47:22 pruebas kernel: oce0: Emulex CNA NIC
function:///10.0.747.0/// mem
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #13 from bor...@sarenet.es ---
I downloaded the source code from here.
http://www.emulex.com/downloads/emulex/drivers/freebsd/freebsd-91-amd64/drivers/
To summarize:
Compiles cleanly and works on 10-STABLE
Can be compiled
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #15 from Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org ---
Updating Version to 9.3-BETA3 to reflect latest reproduction test.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.2-RELEASE |9.3-BETA3
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185967
kved...@kvedulv.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kved...@kvedulv.de
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185967
--- Comment #10 from kved...@kvedulv.de ---
Hi Oliver,
(In reply to olivier from comment #8)
The patch didn't solve Lagg regression between 9.2 and 10-stable (r267244).
My configuration only use one lagg member (the second will be
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184311
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190785
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181657
Christian Brueffer bruef...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190785
--- Comment #5 from John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org ---
Well, cpuset -x forces affinity for the ithread even if the driver did not
request it. I do believe that em does not request specific affinity on its
own.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190785
--- Comment #6 from gon...@bsdinfo.com.br ---
So it's not a bug, it's a feature of the driver. Can we close this bug then.
Thanks and best regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190785
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190785
--- Comment #8 from gon...@bsdinfo.com.br ---
Yes it changes the CPU. With top -PSH you can see it changing CPU.
I did: cpuset -x 264 -l 3
See my top below:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIMEWCPU COMMAND
10
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190785
--- Comment #9 from John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org ---
Ah, the em0 que thread is a separate helper thread created by the em driver
to service a taskqueue. It is not an interrupt thread so it is not affected by
'cpuset -x'. However, you can
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190785
--- Comment #10 from gon...@bsdinfo.com.br ---
Cool Thanks! Works now. :D
Cheers,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191380
Mark Linimon lini...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191312
Mark Linimon lini...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191343
Mark Linimon lini...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191192
Mark Linimon lini...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191384
Mark Linimon lini...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191312
Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191384
Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191192
Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191343
Cy Schubert c...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190038
Cy Schubert c...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191520
Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191415
Mark Linimon lini...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191700
Mark Linimon lini...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154851
Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Discussion |Open
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154851
Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ko...@freebsd.org
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176671
Shuto.Imai dev.shutin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #17 from bor...@sarenet.es ---
Created attachment 144718
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144718action=edit
10-STABLE patch for the oce driver by Stefano Garzarella
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #18 from bor...@sarenet.es ---
Luigi Rizzo and Stefano Garzarella pointed out several bugs. Notably, no
locking operations in critical sections.
Stefano Garzarella sent a test patch against -STABLE. With the patch I haven't
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187835
Vladislav V. Prodan ad...@support.od.ua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
Mark Linimon lini...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
--- Comment #2 from dgilb...@eicat.ca ---
I've done some additional work on the problem. One thing I have done is to
enable the rc.conf variable
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES
... which changes the ifconfig for the ngX interfaces to
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187341
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #140669|0 |1
is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187341
--- Comment #3 from Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@freebsd.org ---
Forgot to mention that the attached patch is ae@'s work, not mine. I have
tested it on a production system and can confirm that it works as intended.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187341
--- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: ae
Date: Wed Jul 30 15:08:12 UTC 2014
New revision: 269306
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/269306
Log:
Add new rule to source address
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191520
--- Comment #1 from Tom Jones jo...@sdf.org ---
Created attachment 145214
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145214action=edit
Updated NewCWV patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191520
--- Comment #2 from Tom Jones jo...@sdf.org ---
Comment on attachment 145214
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145214
Updated NewCWV patch
Updated the patch to move the NewCWV into a struct within tcpcb
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191520
--- Comment #3 from Tom Jones jo...@sdf.org ---
Created attachment 145216
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145216action=edit
Updated NewCWV patch
Move NewCWV state into a struct within tcpcb
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154850
nde...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91311
Dan Langille d...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@free.de
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192426
Mark Linimon lini...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187341
--- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: ae
Date: Wed Aug 13 15:48:10 UTC 2014
New revision: 269944
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/269944
Log:
MFC r269306:
Add new rule to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
--- Comment #4 from dgilb...@eicat.ca ---
This is to say: that a host connecting trough an ng_iface interface can access
the rest of the network, but cannot access the host on which the ng_iface
resides. _And_ this is a regression in 10.0.
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181741
Harald Schmalzbauer bugzilla.free...@omnilan.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192426
Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[bpf] [panic]: Kernel panic |[bpf]
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
--- Comment #6 from dgilb...@eicat.ca ---
I'd like to quickly respond before things veer away. The problem exists when
pf is not even loaded or enabled. I brought in some pf examples to try to
discern which parts of the stack see the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
--- Comment #7 from dgilb...@eicat.ca ---
I can also add that I have an application that uses if_tun interfaces and they
don't exhibit the ng_iface problems. Nor do the gif interfaces exhibit the
problem when the packet has not arrived on
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
--- Comment #8 from Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org ---
Then this might be artifact of quagga. Can you show 'netstat -rn'?
P.S. I'm using mpd5 client and server on FreeBSD head for many years, and
didn't encounter the problems you
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
--- Comment #9 from dgilb...@eicat.ca ---
Created attachment 146574
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146574action=edit
netstat -rn on the computer with the this ticket's problem
As requested. The particular client
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975
--- Comment #10 from dgilb...@eicat.ca ---
(In reply to Gleb Smirnoff from comment #8)
P.S. I'm using mpd5 client and server on FreeBSD head for many years, and
didn't encounter the problems you describe neither in 10-CURRENT lifetime,
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
--- Comment #1 from Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org ---
Previously, I reported some error messages reported by Jenkins
on startup:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2014-February/010593.html
I looked at the Jenkins
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
--- Comment #2 from Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org ---
I did some more analysis and found that this code:
13253 java CALL bind(0x4,0x7fbfd7a8,0x1c)
13253 java STRU struct sockaddr { AF_INET6, [::]:33848 }
13253 java
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
--- Comment #3 from Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org ---
I ran the same test program under truss with:
truss java MulticastTest
and found this:
socket(PF_INET6,SOCK_DGRAM,0)= 4 (0x4)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bug in multicast bind(),|Bug in IPv6
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
--- Comment #4 from Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org ---
I tracked this down some more.
Inside the JDK, there is this code in
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
--- Comment #6 from Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org ---
I'm looking at this from the perspective that
3rd party multicast code written in Java just works under Linux
and Solaris, but fails under FreeBSD.
Sure, using an IPv4 socket from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
--- Comment #7 from Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org ---
In src/sys/netinet6, I see that there is usage of a
IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED() macro in other places in the code, like in udp6 and
sctp6,
so V4 mapped addresses are supported for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|In Discussion
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
Ronald Klop ronald-li...@klop.ws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
--- Comment #10 from Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org ---
Ronald,
Thanks for the tip.
java -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true MulticastTest
seems to work around the problem.
I would still like to see FreeBSD fixed so that this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193246
--- Comment #11 from Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org ---
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [Bug 193246] Bug in IPv6 multicast join(), uncovered by
Jenkins
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:05:14 +0100
From: Bruce
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157287
Joerg Wunsch jo...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185967
--- Comment #11 from oliv...@cochard.me ---
(In reply to kvedulv from comment #10)
Hi Oliver,
(In reply to olivier from comment #8)
The patch didn't solve Lagg regression between 9.2 and 10-stable (r267244).
My configuration only
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
Eric Joyner ricer...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ricer...@gmail.com
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
--- Comment #3 from ncrog...@gmail.com ---
From what I can tell, the changes in the newer ixgbe driver here:
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=14688
Fix two of three problems with the IXGBE_LEGACY_TX path that I
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
--- Comment #4 from Eric Joyner ricer...@gmail.com ---
Why do you believe the third change is necessary? Is there a reason the extra
code in the que_task tasklet must run in the legacy tx case?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
--- Comment #5 from ncrog...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #4)
Why do you believe the third change is necessary? Is there a reason the
extra code in the que_task tasklet must run in the legacy tx case?
Because of
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
--- Comment #6 from Eric Joyner ricer...@gmail.com ---
You didn't try a kernel build with the newer driver that I posted?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
--- Comment #7 from ncrog...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #6)
You didn't try a kernel build with the newer driver that I posted?
I have not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and
Hi,
You have a bug in the Needs MFC state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
1 - 100 of 12150 matches
Mail list logo
