*Cool, But maybe not all people are following this topic, so can you please
simplify it by answering below question in order to allow more people to
know what is going on here.*
*What kind of problem you are facing and how does your patch resolve it?*
On 4 February 2015 at 17:24, Lev
*cool, I like this, it got some points.*
*though the email is too long to be read.*
On 3 February 2015 at 14:44, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2/3/15 3:17 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
I propose two new actions: state-allow and state-deny.
They imply keep-state and
these big
bosses. *
*Compare to the ipfw in FreeBSD, there are few differences. not a big deal.*
*1. modular*
*2. lock-less*
*3. old version*
*Regards,*
*Bycn82*
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Sato Kentney satokent...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
ok. i will test it.
but he said it is faster
2014-12-15
*So **please DON'T make me a joker in front of all these big bosses. *
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:10 PM, bycn82 byc...@gmail.com wrote:
*Hi Sato,*
*I am also in this email list, If you have any question, You can ask,I
just double checked whether I made mistake or not, and I only found
://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/
We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wondering why
DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and experience
rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=ipfwsection
PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Please run compiler with -O2 -S to get the assembly to see what will
actually happen.
thanks,
-Alfred
On 10/29/14 9:24 PM, bycn82 wrote:
Hi,
According to my understanding in Java programming, the compiler will
automatically store
because xmit will check the out interface.
Regards,
Bycn82
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org]
On Behalf Of Raimundo Santos
Sent: Tuesday, 28 October, 2014 3:32 PM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: ipfw fwd duplicating packets
, it will jump to N, because call the cases are nice in running
numbers,
but when the cases are messy, it will by just like lots of if/else
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Erich Dollansky
erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 22:39:34 +0800
bycn82 byc...@gmail.com wrote
...@freebsd.org
Hi,
Good job, Waiting for your code :)
Regards,
Bycn82
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi,
Yes, according to your pcap files,it is because of the window size.
more information here http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1323.txt
and share the result of sysctl net.inet.tcp
Regards,
bycn82
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
n
comments?
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:48:58PM +0800, bycn82 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: 'Luigi Rizzo' [mailto:ri...@iet.unipi.it]
Sent: 29 May, 2014 21:10
To: bycn82
Cc: 'FreeBSD Net'
Subject: Re
:~ # ipfw table 1 list
1.2.3.4/32 0
root@FB10Head:~ #
Currently still cleaning the table handling function, and did not add the lock
in the kernel functions when changing the `mapping chain`.
Regards,
bycn82
-Original Message-
From: Alexander V. Chernikov [mailto:melif...@ipfw.ru
accept that every object has
an integer ID.
Hi Alex,
Why not clean the ipfw_table_handler() function using the switch/case? Like in
my patch, It can be easier to understand the code.
Best Regards,
bycn82
-Original Message-
From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:ri...@iet.unipi.it]
Sent: 05 June, 2014
: 05 June, 2014 23:54
To: bycn82
Cc: 'Alexander V. Chernikov'; 'FreeBSD Net'
Subject: Re: [CFT]: ipfw named tables / different tabletypes
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 10:49:27PM +0800, bycn82 wrote:
Hi Luigi,
Yes, use string instead of integer for the ID of table, but the same
method cannot apply
Sure your generic binary match could be a welcome
addition to ipfw. But its usefulness is extremely
limited in practice, as it only lets you match stuff
in fixed position of a packet, and it is not even good
to do other relatively simple things such as skip
options and the like.
Sure.
-Original Message-
From: 'Luigi Rizzo' [mailto:ri...@iet.unipi.it]
Sent: 29 May, 2014 21:10
To: bycn82
Cc: 'FreeBSD Net'
Subject: Re: propose a new generic purpose rule option for ipfw
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:45:26PM +0800, bycn82 wrote:
...
Sure, that is the reason why
show
1: 8.000 bit/s 0 ms burst 0
q131073 50 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 65537 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
sched 65537 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 0 active
root@FB10Head:~ #
Best Regards,
Bycn82
___
freebsd-net
Ok, anyway, ignore it. :)
From: bycn82 [mailto:byc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 May, 2014 1:09
To: Alexander V. Chernikov; Luigi Rizzo
Cc: FreeBSD Net
Subject: RE: a defect in ipfw dummynet
Hi ,
After I think it twice, I think the code and the document are OK, But the
problem is from
Hi Sato,
My fix is a temp solution, and actually you can just update the source code to
the latest version or use others. According to what I know, developer Alex is
currently working/enhancing the ipfw table feature. I think you will like the
new features.
Best Regards,
bycn82
this after finishing
new tables code merge.
I'm risking to be annoying, but there is a good (from customers point of
view) example of tables manipulation in Linux: ipset project
(http://ipset.netfilter.org/ipset.man.html)
19.05.2014 17:21, bycn82 пишет:
It will be nice to have this feature
On 5/19/14 21:00, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 19.05.2014 11:51, Bill Yuan wrote:
Hi Alex,
Hello Bill!
You guys are chatting here! I agree with you, the table is the place
should
be enhanced, and I am working in this way as described below
1. Support more types.
ip : cidr
ipv4 :
/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
It will be nice to have this feature,
but since the `ipfw table id list` is existing,
so I think this can be implemented outside the ipfw.
(personal opinion only )
bycn82
22 matches
Mail list logo
