On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Barney Cordoba
barney_cord...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Thu, 8/9/12, Jason Wolfe nitrobo...@gmail.com wrote:
Ever since r235553 the 82574L has been stable for me,
collectively
passing ~1.2Tb/s for the past 4 months without issue.
We did have
some issues with
--- On Thu, 8/9/12, Jason Wolfe nitrobo...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jason Wolfe nitrobo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 82574L hangs (with r233708 e1000 driver).
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com, j...@freebsd.org, Jack
Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:25:35AM -0700, Barney Cordoba wrote:
--- On Fri, 5/11/12, Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: 82574L hangs (with r233708 e1000 driver).
To: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org, Konstantin
--- On Fri, 5/11/12, Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: 82574L hangs (with r233708 e1000 driver).
To: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com
Cc: j...@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel jfvo
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Fri, 5/11/12, Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com wrote:
FWIW, I've got an X7SPE-HF-D525 MB with 82574L running on a
7.0 driver
that seems to work pretty well. It panics once in a blue
moon when we
--- On Tue, 5/8/12, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 82574L hangs (with r233708 e1000 driver).
To: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org
Cc: j...@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com, n...@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, May
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:44:57PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 6:18:19 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:30:22AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:21:21 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:38:49PM
On Friday, May 04, 2012 6:18:19 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:30:22AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:21:21 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:38:49PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:21:21 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:38:49PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:19:39PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, April 08, 2012 1:11:25 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:30:22AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:21:21 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:38:49PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:19:39PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, April 08, 2012
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:38:49PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:19:39PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, April 08, 2012 1:11:25 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:22:07PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Make sure you have any firmware
it sometime in the future (or
if I'm lazy just buy another NIC).
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/82574L-hangs-with-r233708-e1000-driver-tp5624584p5678671.html
Sent from the freebsd-net mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:40:27PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
And, on receive, the atom board does receive interrupts, em0:rx 0 counter
in vmstat -i increases. Even more fun, the sysctl dev.em.0.debug
shows
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:19:39PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, April 08, 2012 1:11:25 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:22:07PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Make sure you have any firmware up to the latest available, if that
doesn't
help
let me know and
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
And, on receive, the atom board does receive interrupts, em0:rx 0 counter
in vmstat -i increases. Even more fun, the sysctl dev.em.0.debug
shows increasing hw rdh (as I understand, this is hardware 'last
received'
On Sunday, April 08, 2012 1:11:25 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:22:07PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Make sure you have any firmware up to the latest available, if that doesn't
help
let me know and I'll check internally to see if there are any outstanding
issues
I bought Intel Atom motherboard DN2800MT, which has integrated if_em
LOM, reported by pciconf as
em0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x20128086 chip=0x10d38086 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
82574L Gigabit Network Connection
It seems that any non-trivial network activity on the interface causes
reliable
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
I bought Intel Atom motherboard DN2800MT, which has integrated if_em
LOM, reported by pciconf as
em0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x20128086 chip=0x10d38086 rev=0x00
hdr=0x00
82574L Gigabit Network Connection
Make sure you have any firmware up to the latest available, if that doesn't
help
let me know and I'll check internally to see if there are any outstanding
issues
in shared code, that will be after the weekend.
Jack
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 03:06:38PM -0700, Jason Wolfe wrote:
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
I bought Intel Atom motherboard DN2800MT, which has integrated if_em
LOM, reported by pciconf as
em0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x20128086
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:22:07PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Make sure you have any firmware up to the latest available, if that doesn't
help
let me know and I'll check internally to see if there are any outstanding
issues
in shared code, that will be after the weekend.
I had BIOS rev. 151,
21 matches
Mail list logo
