Re: Will this card (probably) work?

2016-09-27 Thread Lee Brown
Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but I cannot find anything single-mode from Intel except the X520-LR1 (82599ES chipset) which is only a single port. Everything else is Multi-mode. Even a lot of the SFP stuff only supports MM. At least that's where my research leads me. If you have any

FreeBSD 11.0 / netmap-fwd / ngeth0 / vrrp / vif

2016-09-27 Thread Outback Dingo
Hi, curious, Ive tried netmapfwd with ngeth0 / vrrp and it doesnt seem to be passing packets through to the VIF. basically its a pair of redundent BGP routers. Does ngeth and VRRP work with netmap-fwd ? or am i going to need to look at using openvswitch ? Thanks

[Bug 213015] openvswitch and vnet jails - panic when bridge is destroyed and recreated

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213015 --- Comment #4 from Bjoern A. Zeeb --- (In reply to akoshibe from comment #2) When in your shell script does the panic happen? Do you know? I wonder if it's before the ifconfig commands. In general I wonder if the

[Bug 213015] openvswitch and vnet jails - panic when bridge is destroyed and recreated

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213015 Bjoern A. Zeeb changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 213015] openvswitch and vnet jails - panic when bridge is destroyed and recreated

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213015 --- Comment #5 from akosh...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Bjoern A. Zeeb from comment #4) I'm suspecting that the panic occurs when I create the bridge for the second time. I'm going to try to check if that's the case later today. -- You

[Bug 212283] oversized IP datagrams on raw socket with IP_RAWOUTPUT hang network interface drivers

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212283 --- Comment #15 from Mathieu Arnold --- This is still a problem on 11.0-RELEASE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Bug 213015] openvswitch and vnet jails - panic when bridge is destroyed and recreated

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213015 --- Comment #2 from akosh...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Palle Girgensohn from comment #1) I've noticed that I won't trigger a panic if, keeping everything else the same, I omit sending traffic (e.g. the one ping in the test script) or

[Bug 213015] openvswitch and vnet jails - panic when bridge is destroyed and recreated

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213015 --- Comment #6 from Palle Girgensohn --- (In reply to Bjoern A. Zeeb from comment #3) Mmm, indeed it is. But I haven't seen that much action about epair lately, has it really been improved enough? The described problem

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

2016-09-27 Thread Jack Vogel
Its not that they, whoever they is :). "use" the Intel PCID, no, it really IS the Intel device, but it's silicon, not an assembled adapter, its that part which is being done by someone else, and btw, the components to support 4 port type adapters have been notoriously problematic in the past, so

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

2016-09-27 Thread Lee Brown
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > Yes, "should be", but just remember now, if this adapter does not look > like a > genuine Intel made part (and from some comment from either Jeff or Eric it > sounded like it wasn't), then IF you have a problem you are going

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

2016-09-27 Thread Lee Brown
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > Its not that they, whoever they is :). "use" the Intel PCID, no, it really > IS the Intel device, > but it's silicon, not an assembled adapter, its that part which is being > done by someone > else, and btw, the components

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

2016-09-27 Thread Jack Vogel
I think I should let Intel speak to this, they do have quad port adapters in their offerings, and as far as I know they are fine. I was speaking of times past when the bridge device would be the source of problems, and just saying if this was a non-Intel design it could be an issue, but since you

[Bug 213015] openvswitch and vnet jails - panic when bridge is destroyed and recreated

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213015 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org

[Bug 213015] openvswitch and vnet jails - panic when bridge is destroyed and recreated

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213015 Palle Girgensohn changed: What|Removed |Added CC|