https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240825
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mm...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240818
Piotr Pietruszewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotr.pietruszewski@intel.c
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236724
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||240700
URL|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240787
Aleksandr Fedorov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandr.fedorov@itglobal.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239704
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240787
--- Comment #4 from l...@donnerhacke.de ---
Thank you for pointing me to phabricator.
I'll try to find out how it works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240787
--- Comment #5 from l...@donnerhacke.de ---
Moved to https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21803
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
--- Comment #21 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: markj
Date: Thu Sep 26 15:37:40 UTC 2019
New revision: 352749
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352749
Log:
MFC r352625:
Revert
on-topic but here’s a diff from a
work-tree of mine from sometime earlier this year:
https://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20190926-01-golegacy.diff
This is a lot of resolver and rpc (libc) code. I think this did compile
but I am almost certain that a few changes are not doing the right thing
and nee
Mihir Luthra wrote:
>Hiroki Sato wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think you should learn TI-RPC API first. The nettype specifies a
>> class of transport protocol, not address family.
>>
>> Thanks, I did some more research on TI-RPC today.
>In `statd.c` what I see is in `create_service()`/`complete_service()`,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240825
Hans Petter Selasky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hsela...@freebsd.org
---
>
>
> I think you should learn TI-RPC API first. The nettype specifies a
> class of transport protocol, not address family.
>
> Thanks, I did some more research on TI-RPC today.
In `statd.c` what I see is in `create_service()`/`complete_service()`,
transport info is being fetched through
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240818
--- Comment #2 from Olivier Cochard ---
Here is a user use case:
FreeBSD as a router serving multiple customer: one customer per vlan.
Each time we add a new customer, we add a VLAN… and the link re-init, so all
the customers are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240825
--- Comment #3 from Yaroslav Shvets ---
However if destroy the broken vlan-interface and lagg-interface after FreeBSD
booting,
and create them again, the vlan-interface works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240818
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
--- Comment #22 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: markj
Date: Thu Sep 26 18:36:15 UTC 2019
New revision: 352766
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352766
Log:
MFS r352749:
Revert
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236724
Harald Schmalzbauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla.free...@omnilan.de
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240658
Harald Schmalzbauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
See
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240658
Harald Schmalzbauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|Open
Hi All
I have vlan111 and vlan222 bridged into bridge2. Then multicast traffic
from vlan111 sending and I get it at vlan222 even if 'ifconfig vlan222
down' issued.
Is it bug or known feature?
FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE r348449 GENERIC amd64
Thanks!
--
CU,
Victor Gamov
Mihir Luthra wrote
in :
lu> >
lu> >
lu> > I think you should learn TI-RPC API first. The nettype specifies a
lu> > class of transport protocol, not address family.
lu> >
lu> > Thanks, I did some more research on TI-RPC today.
lu> In `statd.c` what I see is in
22 matches
Mail list logo
