Re: Intel 4-port ethernet adaptor link aggregation issue

, as it separates create and initialise from configure for cloned/virtual interfaces like vlans, laggs, etc. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe

Re: [RFC] Patch to add Software/Generic Segmentation Offload (GSO) support in FreeBSD

to packet throughput through IPFW? Or is it still way too early in development to be worrying about such things? :) -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net

Fwd: Re: Carp stuck in INIT

Forgot to include the list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com Date: Oct 15, 2014 8:57 AM Subject: Re: Carp stuck in INIT To: Matt Churchyard matt.churchy...@userve.net Cc: You don't need the up keyword, and it definitely works with a /30 and a single IP

Re: Carp stuck in INIT

FreeBSD 9 and FreeBSD 10 have very different implementations of CARP, and they are configured differently. On 9, you need to have an IP configured on the interface before you configure the shared IP, and the subnet of the shared IP is used to determine the interface to use. And there's carpX

Re: LAGG and CARP troubles

If you're adventurous, could you upgrade a test box to 10-CURRENT and try the new CARP code? ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: bus width and PCIe version

D3 current D0 cap 10[68] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(4096) link x8(x8) cap 03[d0] = VPD cap 05[a8] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit cap 11[c0] = MSI-X supports 15 messages in map 0x14 enabled ... -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com

Re: System doesn't detect unplugged network cable and doesn't set interface up properly with DHCP

kill process id dhclient re0 pkill dhclient dhclient re0 Saves a few more steps. :) There's also: service netif restart re0 -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: Issue with igb and lagg (was Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd)

On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org wrote: Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg. igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg. To be sure I started from scratch from a 9.0 release with nothing but: /etc/rc.conf

Re: Issue with igb and lagg (was Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd)

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org wrote: On 09/11/2012 11:34 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org mailto:au...@zirakzigil.org wrote: Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg. igb

Re: Issue with igb and lagg (was Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd)

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x. You're right, it seems to be pointing to the igb(4) driver in 9.x compared to 9.0

Re: MAC cloning available like Linux has?

blah ifconfig_ue0_alias0=DHCP -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Problems with two interfaces on the same subnet?

. Or are you thinking of hard-coding client addresses in ipfw rules so that packets going to specific IPs go to a specific interface? -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: Configuring for 1 static and 1 DHCP interface ?

. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: natd starting after firewall rules are loaded

. :) A better read, though, are the NOTES files: /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES (arch independent options) /usr/src/sys/arch/conf/NOTES (arch dependent options) -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: Routing enhancement - reduce routing table locking

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:06 PM, K. Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:42 AM, K. Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote: I'm not able to find IFNET_MULTIQUEUE in a recent 8.2-STABLE, is this something present

Re: ipfw - accessing DMZ from LAN

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Marek Salwerowicz marek_...@wp.pl wrote: W dniu 2011-08-09 18:04, Freddie Cash pisze: On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Marek Salwerowiczmarek_...@wp.pl wrote: I have set up a new router for my network, with separated DMZ zone for my internet servers. I'd

Re: new CARP implementation

, and keeping the configuration details separate from the underlying physical interface. This now makes creating/configuring CARP different from creating/configuring vLANs. :( -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: new CARP implementation

2011/8/11 Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: F However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX F pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX, F vlanX, brX, and other pseudo

Re: ipfw - accessing DMZ from LAN

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Marek Salwerowicz marek_...@wp.pl wrote: W dniu 2011-08-10 16:22, Freddie Cash pisze: The more correct method is to double-NAT the traffic, such that the LAN clients connect to public IPs, and the DMZ servers see connections from

Re: ipfw - accessing DMZ from LAN

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Marek Salwerowicz marek_...@wp.pl wrote: W dniu 2011-09-26 21:20, Freddie Cash pisze: Your rules are too generic, they will not work for a double-NAT setup. Each and every single rule must specify the network interface. And it must specify whether it's

Re: ipfw - accessing DMZ from LAN

assigned to the interfaces on the router. Thus, connecting to the public IPs from the router ... will connect to the router. You need to ping the private IPs from the router, since the router is directly connected to the private networks. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com

Re: ipfw - accessing DMZ from LAN

On Oct 1, 2011 12:16 PM, Marek Salwerowicz marek_...@wp.pl wrote: W dniu 2011-09-30 17:44, Freddie Cash pisze: that's the correct behaviour, as the public IPs are physically assigned to the interfaces on the router. Thus, connecting to the public IPs from the router ... will connect

Re: ipfw - accessing DMZ from LAN , pipes

Apologies if the formatting below gets messed up, writing this on my phone. On Nov 28, 2011 2:36 PM, Marek Salwerowicz marek_...@wp.pl wrote: I am confused about one thing - I wanted to set up pipes for my DMZ hosts (not to allow my hosts to consume all the bandwidth). When I set up the pipes

Re: carpdev?

, they won't join the carp vhid issue fixed in this patch? I'd be happy to test this again, if the IP order issue has been fixed. -- Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net

Understanding where dummynet fits into an ipfw ruleset

the rules for the workstations? Do I add them after all the bad packet checks and general deny rules that are at the top of the ruleset? Just wondering how the queue rules interact with the general packet filter rules, since they can have the same parameters. Thanks. -- Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Understanding where dummynet fits into an ipfw ruleset

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 27, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: Mainly, I'm wondering where to put the ipfw queue rules (the ones that send the packets to dummynet), in relation to the packet filtering rules, or if it even matters

Re: Understanding where dummynet fits into an ipfw ruleset

don't see why that wouldn't work .. I never said it wouldn't (or didn't) work. :) -- Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp]

/sbin/ifconfig em3 polling (and via /etc/rc.local also across reboots) No, you put it into the ifconfig_X lines in /etc/rc.conf as the last option. Or -polling to disable it. ifconfig_em0='inet 1.2.3.4/24 polling ifconfig_em2='inet 1.2.3.5/24 -polling -- Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Virtual machine on freebsd

On December 4, 2008 11:58 pm Antonio Tommasi wrote: Hi to all, i want to install a virtual machine on my FreeBSD 7.0 box. Can you tell me which is the better sofware to do this? For a FreeBSD host, QEmu is the best supported option. There's also Win4BSD, which is a customised/modified version

Re: Hi. /31 on ethernet links

, Sebastian H ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com

Re: Do any of the wireless ethernet drivers support higher than 54Mbps rates

802.11n (up to 480 Mbps or something like that), though, as I don't have access to any 802.11n hardware. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any

setfib, ipfw, dual-NICs, separate subnets

. Eventually, I'll be adding more IPFW rules to block unwanted traffic. Am I missing anything? Are the route delete statements needed? Is there a better way to configure this than using /etc/rc.local? -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net

Re: IPFW firewall NAT, port address translation, and active FTP

if IPFW has one built in, as I've never tried to use one (either configure the client for PASV, or no connection is our policy for FTP), but PF includes ftp-proxy. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: carp + carpdev option?

OpenBSD. :) It's the final missing link in our dreams of redundant firewalls/routers and storage servers. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send

Understanding the interplay of ipfw, vlan, and carp

interface: one shared IP for the carp device, one management IP for the vlan device. Which seems really complicated and not-quite-right. Maybe I'm just over-thinking things. Any pointers greatly appreciated. Thanks. -- Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Understanding the interplay of ipfw, vlan, and carp

On March 4, 2008 02:20 pm Max Laier wrote: Am Di, 4.03.2008, 22:51, schrieb Freddie Cash: ... The lack of a carpdev option to directly link a carp device to an interface (similar to vlandev for vlan(4)) is what's really tripping me up. It appears the carp(4) driver looks at all

Re: Understanding the interplay of ipfw, vlan, and carp

On March 4, 2008 03:25 pm Freddie Cash wrote: On March 4, 2008 02:20 pm Max Laier wrote: Am Di, 4.03.2008, 22:51, schrieb Freddie Cash: ... The lack of a carpdev option to directly link a carp device to an interface (similar to vlandev for vlan(4)) is what's really tripping me up

Re: Understanding the interplay of ipfw, vlan, and carp

On March 5, 2008 12:09 pm you wrote: Am Mi, 5.03.2008, 20:39, schrieb Freddie Cash: On March 4, 2008 03:25 pm Freddie Cash wrote: Patch applied cleanly to RELENG_7.0. However, there are a few strange things happening now. If there are IPs on the physical devices (em0|em1) things only

Separate rules for each port, or one for all ports?

from any to me 443 in recv fxp0 ipfw add allow tcp from any to me 1 in recv fxp0 Other than the ability to track traffic through each port, of course. -- Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http

established on { tcp or udp } rules

in recv fxp0 established Will the UDP packets go through correctly, even though established has no meaning for UDP streams, and the ipfw command will barf if you use it with just ipfw add udp rules? -- Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-net

Re: established on { tcp or udp } rules

On March 19, 2008 01:34 pm Freddie Cash wrote: Just curious if the following rule will work correctly. It is accepted by the ipfw command. In the process of working out a test for it, but thought I'd ask here as well, just to be sure. ipfw add { tcp or udp } from me to any 53 out xmit

Re: established on { tcp or udp } rules

On March 19, 2008 01:43 pm Freddie Cash wrote: On March 19, 2008 01:34 pm Freddie Cash wrote: Just curious if the following rule will work correctly. It is accepted by the ipfw command. In the process of working out a test for it, but thought I'd ask here as well, just to be sure

Re: established on { tcp or udp } rules

On March 19, 2008 01:47 pm you wrote: Freddie Cash wrote: Just curious if the following rule will work correctly. It is accepted by the ipfw command. In the process of working out a test for it, but thought I'd ask here as well, just to be sure. ipfw add { tcp or udp } from me

Re: established on { tcp or udp } rules

On March 19, 2008 01:56 pm you wrote: Freddie Cash wrote: On March 19, 2008 01:43 pm Freddie Cash wrote: On March 19, 2008 01:34 pm Freddie Cash wrote: Just curious if the following rule will work correctly. It is accepted by the ipfw command. In the process of working out a test

Re: established on { tcp or udp } rules

wrote a UDP rule with TCP options at the end, as that is what got me in the habit of writing separate UDP and TCP rules. Now that I found the { udp or tcp } syntax, I was rewriting some rules on a test firewall and noticed that it would accept TCP option even if udp was listed. -- Freddie Cash

Re: any reason not to enable IPDIVERT for ipfw module?

On Oct 31, 2014 12:12 PM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote: Can any one think of a good reason not to enable IPDIVERT sockets in the ipfw module? And possibly enabling default to accept? That way you don't have to go to the console when you load the ipfw module because you forgot

Re: Tying down network interfaces

On Dec 30, 2014 10:02 AM, Martin Birgmeier la5lb...@aon.at wrote: Hi, I have two network interfaces as follows: sis0: NatSemi DP8381[56] 10/100BaseTX port 0xa400-0xa4ff mem 0xd580-0xd5800fff irq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0 sis1: NatSemi DP8381[56] 10/100BaseTX port 0x9400-0x94ff mem

Re: CARP vhid: across interfaces?

wrote: On 1/01/2015 10:22pm, Freddie Cash wrote: There's a sysctl specifically for this. Not at my computer right now, but the following should make it jump out at you: # sysctl -d | grep carp I'm guessing this one (from the openBSD docs)... net.inet.carp.preempt Allow hosts within

Re: CARP vhid: across interfaces?

There's a sysctl specifically for this. Not at my computer right now, but the following should make it jump out at you: # sysctl -d | grep carp Cheers, Freddie On Jan 1, 2015 3:20 AM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote: I have two firewalls built with FreeBSD 10.1 which are working

Re: Problems with IP fragments (was: Problems with DNSSEC -- answer in fragmented UDP doesn't work)

any to any in recv $NIC1 ... -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: [RFC] ifconfig description

it. e.g. ifconfig_vlan3_description=‘BLAH BLAH BLAH” ​I'd be interested in this. Didn't know about the description option for ifconfig, but can see it being useful at work. Having it integrated into rc.conf(5) would be handy.​ -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com

Re: [RFC] ifconfig description

ifconfig_IF_description variable to set, but still very much workable. Thanks for the pointer in the right direction. Now to play with it at work. :) -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: who uses this port?

> > -- > Andriy Gapon > ___ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com

Re: Identify physical port given a network interface name on Dell PowerEdge servers?

4:0:0 vs 4:0:1 Looks to me like ix0 would be port 0, and ix1 would be port 1. On Mar 29, 2016 5:27 PM, "Pallav Bose via freebsd-net" < freebsd-net@freebsd.org> wrote: > Thank you, John. Yes, dmidecode works perfectly for onboard NICs, but I > wasn't able to obtain precise information about a NIC

Re: Not able to raise the MTU on FreeBSD 10.3

face route" limits you > and it is not changed > automatically with interface MTU in your version of FreeBSD. > ​You can also manually delete and re-add the route with the -mtu option, if you don't want to drop/add the IP.​ -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com

Re: Multiple MAC addresses on a single interface

r vlan: 30 parent interface: igb0 ​Whether or not that actually works would require someone to run some tcpdumps/wireshark on the vlanX and vlanY interfaces to see what the Ethernet frames actually look like. :) -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___

Re: carp and subnets

hanks! > ​With FreeBSD 9.x and earlier, no, you can't. The CARP setup uses the IP/subnet of the host interface for sending the CARP messages. With FreeBSD 10.x and above, yes, you can. The CARP setup uses the IP/subnet of the VHID for sending CARP messages, which can be set to anything. So l

Re: VLAN + CARP ?

skew 128 12.24.10.1/26" ​em2 had no IPs associated with it, it was just the physical interface that the vlans and carp traffic went over. We also only had a single subnet per vlan, so only a single IP per carp instance on each vlan. But you can do multiples using the alias syntax like

Re: Will this card (probably) work?

rver-adapter-i350.html All the other variants (T2, T4, F2) come in low-profile formats. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any ma

Re: "igb" interfaces aren't picking up media on boot

P on the network. Worked for us. Might work for you.​ -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Some questions about in-kernel NAT

at's the ipfw command that's run at boot time? Sounds like it's configured to use the interface address instead of a specific IP address.​ -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 6:17 AM Abdullah Tariq wrote: > > > > No, its simplier: single bridge contains all interfaces corresponting to > > ports of single vlan. > > You can bridge plain igb* interfaces for untagged ports; or bridge > > interface igbX with interface vlanY > >

Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help

If you want to think of it in switch terms, FreeBSD supports access ports (untagged vlan) and trunk ports (tagged vlans). But there's no support for hybrid ports (tagged vlans with a PVID on the port that adds tags to untagged traffic). What you are trying to do is create a hybrid port with a

Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:08 AM, Julian Elischer <jul...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 1/5/18 2:08 am, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >> 01.05.2018 1:03, Freddie Cash wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Eugene Grosbein <eu...@grosbein.net >>> <mailto:e

Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Eugene Grosbein <eu...@grosbein.net> wrote: > 30.04.2018 23:46, Freddie Cash wrote: > > > What the OP is trying to do is have PC1 send untagged packets to igb0 on > FreeBSD which is configured for tagged vlan 5. > > Then bridge the pa

Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Eugene Grosbein <eu...@grosbein.net> wrote: > 28.04.2018 21:57, Freddie Cash wrote: > > > If you want to think of it in switch terms, FreeBSD supports access > ports (untagged vlan) and trunk ports (tagged vlans). > > But there's

Fwd: Re: Quasi-enterprise WiFi network

Dammit, forgot to include the list again. Resending -- Forwarded message -- From: fjwc...@gmail.com Date: Jan 7, 2018 8:58 AM Subject: Re: Quasi-enterprise WiFi network To: Victor Sudakov Cc: On Jan 7, 2018 6:31 AM, "Victor Sudakov"

Re: Fwd: Re: Quasi-enterprise WiFi network

On Jan 7, 2018 10:40 AM, "Valeri Galtsev" <galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: On Sun, January 7, 2018 12:04 pm, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Freddie Cash wrote: >> > >> > I'm trying to setup a quasi-enterprise WiFi network for mobile >> > devices

Re: Fwd: Re: Quasi-enterprise WiFi network

On Jan 7, 2018 10:04 AM, "Victor Sudakov" <v...@mpeks.tomsk.su> wrote: Freddie Cash wrote: > > > > I'm trying to setup a quasi-enterprise WiFi network for mobile > > devices. This will be a solution for a public library with the only > > requirem

Re: Fwd: Re: Quasi-enterprise WiFi network

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Victor Sudakov <v...@mpeks.tomsk.su> wrote: > Freddie Cash wrote: > > > > > One trouble I expect here is: if the client goes to https destination, > it > > > will complain about your local apache certificate, as the cli

Re: Fwd: Re: Quasi-enterprise WiFi network

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Freddie Cash <fjwc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Victor Sudakov <v...@mpeks.tomsk.su> > wrote: > >> Freddie Cash wrote: >> > >> > > One trouble I expect here is: if the client goes to htt

Re: [SOLVED] performance issue within VNET jail

On Dec 23, 2017 6:06 AM, "Michael Grimm" wrote: I will skip these questions for the time being, because I did solve my issue 15 minutes before your mail ;-) And I feel sorry for all your now "wasted" efforts in trying to help me. As I am using vtnet interface in a cloud

Re: isc-dhcpd refuses access?

and configure dhcpd to listen on bge0.1 as well as the others. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: RFC8312 Cubic

fully qualified)? > Search the freebsd-stable mailing list archives for the thread with subject line: HEADS UP: TCP CUBIC Broken on 12.0-RELEASE/STABLE https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-December/090255.html An Errata Notice should be going out sometime this mont

Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?)

A version of FreeBSD made especially for you, without any traces of IPv6. Does exactly what you want. Why the long diatribe asking for something else once you've been shown how to do what you want? -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@f