kern.ipc.nmbclusters
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of mxb
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 12:17 PM
To: Jack Vogel
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; mxb
Subject: Re: 9.1-RELEASE-p1: em0: Could not setup receive structu
What Jack means is to swap ports 0/1 with ports 2/3, so that 0/1 are B2B with
the other i350 and ports 2/3 are connected to the switch. Do this on both
sides. The reason for this is because there is a bridge between ports 0/1 and
2/3, so it is possible that the bridge is causing problems when co
One more question; Are these Dell i350 daughter cards or discrete NICs?
Thanks,
Jeff
From: da...@dr.eclipse.co.uk [mailto:da...@dr.eclipse.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 3:44 AM
To: Pieper, Jeffrey E; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: RE: Re: kern/177139: [igb] igb drops ethernet ports 2
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Barney Cordoba
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 5:51 AM
To: Jack Vogel; Nick Rogers
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Clement Hermann (nodens)
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
--- On
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Vogel
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 3:49 PM
To: Joe Moog
Cc: freebsd-net; Ryan Stone
Subject: Re: Intel 4-port ethernet adaptor link aggregation issue
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at
Is there any way that you can try a reproduce this using a B2B configuration,
or something that doesn't use XFP as a link partner? I'm thinking that you are
correct regarding an incompatibility issue between SFP+ and XFP.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mai
lp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:08 AM
To: Pieper, Jeffrey E
Cc: gon...@bsdinfo.com.br; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Network Intel X520-SR2 stopping
> Is there any way that you can try a reproduce this using a B2B
> configuration, or something t
82598, 82599, X520, and X540 can have up to 64 Tx/Rx queues (1 per CPU), but
are limited to 16 RSS queues.
For igb it varies, depending on HW. I can put together a list.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Ryan
I believe the Linux driver DOES however support UDP RSS port hash. It is used
for environments where you can ensure there is no fragmentation. In such use
cases, this allows for a significant performance benefit.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-
-Original Message-
From: adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Adrian Chadd
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 5:50 PM
To: Pieper, Jeffrey E
Cc: Ryan Stone; FreeBSD Net; freebsd-a...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ixgbe and igb - how many queues?
On 15 July 2014 17:47
I noticed that your FC counters aren't incrementing either...which is odd if
you're missing packets and the rx buffers are full.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Wolfe
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1
Support is definitely there (I tested it), although I'll look into the
documentation.
Jeff Pieper
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Hartland
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:41 AM
To: Eugene Grosbein; n...@f
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Sean Bruno
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 2:36 PM
To: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Cc: n...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 10 Gbps NIC selection
> Intel i350
> Intel x520
> Intel X540
One s
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of John-Mark Gurney
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:52 PM
To: Bjoern A. Zeeb
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: if_em and large mtu bug?
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote this message on Wed
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Adrian Chadd
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 11:12 AM
To: Bjoern A. Zeeb
Cc: Jack F Vogel; FreeBSD Networking Mailing List
Subject: Re: ixgbe(4) intr and pps problems in at least HEAD
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Nikolay Denev
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:04 AM
To: m s
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Enable/Disable flow control in FreeBSD
On Jul 25, 2012, at 11:47 AM, m s wrote
The updated drivers are here:
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=17509&lang=eng&ProdId=3299
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=15815&lang=eng&ProdId=3024
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=14688&lang=eng&ProdId=3413
Jeff
-
Hi Marcelo,
A couple of questions - you are using 1310nm fiber on ix0, correct? The
difference seems to be that ix0 is LR and ix1 is SR. Also, is there a reason
that the interrupt rate is set higher for ix0?
dev.ix.0.queue0.interrupt_rate: 5
dev.ix.1.queue0.interrupt_rate: 11627
Jeff
Iirc, we experienced issues with 82574L, where the interface will hang/die.
This is resolved in both FreeBSD and Linux by forcing ASPM off and disabling
MSIX.
Jeff
Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Vogel
Sent
In the past we have, yes. This was a few years ago, but iirc the current
implementation is supposed to be the official solution.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Sean Bruno [mailto:sbr...@ignoranthack.me]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 9:28 AM
To: Pieper, Jeffrey E; Jack Vogel; hiren
The check for supported modules in X710/XL710 is done in the FW, so
unfortunately there is nothing we can do in the driver to add that
functionality. There is a possibility that it could happen at some point, but
not in the foreseeable future.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebs
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Eggert, Lars
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 2:28 AM
To: Kevin Oberman
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Daniel Engberg
Subject: Re: ixl 40G bad performance?
On 2015-10-26, at 4:38, Ke
-Original Message-
From: Eggert, Lars [mailto:l...@netapp.com]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 8:08 AM
To: Pieper, Jeffrey E
Cc: Kevin Oberman ; freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Daniel
Engberg
Subject: Re: ixl 40G bad performance?
On 2015-10-26, at 15:38, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote:
> With
Hrm…
> taskqgroup_attach_cpu: setaffinity failed: 22
> taskqgroup_attach_cpu: setaffinity failed: 22
Is this a fresh snapshot? That should have been fixed in
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=327013 . Can you please
file a bug on this? This looks like an iflib issue.
Than
Hi Rodney,
So this is a XL710-QDA2 that is set to 4x10? (default is 2x40). If you can you
give me the output of sysctl dev.ixl|egrep 'pnp|locati|Version', that would be
helpful.
Thanks,
Jeff
On 3/29/18, 6:16 AM, "owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf of Muenz,
Michael"
wrote:
Am 29
Here are the steps that we use. If you just want to use bare metal, I think
you’ll need to use passthrough : false; in the .conf.
· The only supported output from virtual machines is serial console
(i.e. you don't get a nice GUI if you use a Linux guest)
· You should start your VM
I think the biggest hurdle is that for igb, the pf and vf should be split. That
was being considered at the same time as the ixgbe/ixgbevf split, but there was
little interest at the time.
Jeff
On 5/30/18, 9:13 AM, "owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf of Harry
Schmalzbauer"
wrote:
So what exactly is your complaint? That a higher end chipset has more features
than a low-end chipset?
Jeff
On 10/26/18, 7:13 AM, "Lev Serebryakov" wrote:
On 26.10.2018 15:30, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> I have "router" with two em (82574L) NICs. It has dual-core CPU and
> eac
All,
The initial phabricator review that introduces support for Intel E800 Ethernet
devices is available at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21959. Any feedback would
be appreciated and welcome.
Thanks,
Jeff Pieper
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing lis
We already have a fix in place that will be committed for review shortly.
Thanks,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Hartland
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 1:52 AM
To: Ryan Stone
Cc: Jack F Vogel ;
Steve,
Subdevice: 6 indicates that this is a Dell SKU, and as such I don't believe
their NVMs are included in Intel's public NVMUpdate tool. You'll need to use
Dell's version, which you can find here:
http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/19/Drivers/DriversDetails?driverId=KWCDH
Thanks,
Jeff
Please see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3162.
Thanks,
Jeff
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] on behalf
of Eric van Gyzen [vangy...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:48 AM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sean Br
: Pieper, Jeffrey E
Subject: Re: Intel I219-V Support?
On 29/01/2016 6:54 AM, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote:
> Please see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3162.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.or
You can also parse vmstat -i, which we do as well.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Eric van Gyzen [mailto:vangy...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:23 AM
To: Alan Somers ; Pieper, Jeffrey E
Cc: FreeBSD Net ; Jack Vogel
Subject: Re: TSO test
Alan,
That does sound useful
No, we have scripts that parse vmstat -i.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Eric van Gyzen [mailto:vangy...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:56 AM
To: Pieper, Jeffrey E ; Alan Somers
Cc: FreeBSD Net ; Jack Vogel
Subject: Re: TSO test
Jeff,
So, you reboot the DUT between
Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes with TSO
enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the same scenario
again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:ow
That is possible. I’ll check it out.
Thanks,
Jeff
From: Ryan Stone [mailto:ryst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 8:35 AM
To: Matthew Macy
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Pieper, Jeffrey E
Subject: Re: VLANs are broken in HEAD
r299512 introduced breakage into dhclient, which was fixed
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Vogel
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 8:56 AM
To: Sean Bruno
Cc: Lee Brown ; freebsd-net
Subject: Re: Will this card (probably) work?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Sean
ether 00:00:00:00:00:00
Doesn't seem like a valid MAC.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Hartland
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 5:00 AM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: "igb" inter
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Sean Bruno
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 9:53 AM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Intel 82567V-2 using em driver, no carrier or constant link-state
changes with 1000Bas
Kevin,
Currently there is some missing PCIOV functionality in ix. It is something we
are working on fixing.
Thanks,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Kevin Bowling
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2017 10:58 AM
To
Hi James,
Thanks for reporting this. If you don’t mind, please file a bug here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi so this doesn’t fall off our
radar. We’re pretty sure we know what is happening and how to fix it.
Basically, the Linux PF driver that AWS is using doesn’t support mai
Hi Dan,
Intel(R) Ethernet Server Adapter X520-2 only supports Intel-branded optics,
however you can bypass that check in the driver by adding the following to
/boot/loader.conf:
hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1
I hope this helps,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org On
10G
0x8 - advertise 10M
100M and 10M are only supported on certain adapters.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Dan Langille
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:23 PM
To: Gary Palmer
Cc: sthaug ; Pieper, Jeffrey E ;
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE
On Sun
The ixl driver already supports X722. Inphi CS4227 is a Cortina PHY which ixl
also supports.
Thanks,
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org
> On Behalf Of Ben RUBSON
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 1:47 PM
> To: n...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Intel X722 + Inphi CS4
45 matches
Mail list logo
