[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

2020-07-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

2018-04-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Krzysztof Galazka changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

2017-12-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

2017-12-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 --- Comment #17 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #16) Our if_bridge(4) implementation uses promiscuous mode, so fixing multicast promiscuous setting should be enough without growing of

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

2017-12-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|STP Frames are ignored |[ixl] STP