https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229092
--- Comment #17 from Kristof Provost ---
Right, for 3. we come back to the compatibility issue. pfsync has to remain
able to run with different versions, so while we could potentially extend the
protocol to include this information we
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229092
--- Comment #16 from Kajetan Staszkiewicz ---
(In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #15)
> (In reply to Kajetan Staszkiewicz from comment #13)
>
>> - Any rule using interface IP addresses in unnamed table {} will end up
>> being
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229092
--- Comment #15 from Kristof Provost ---
(In reply to Kajetan Staszkiewicz from comment #13)
> - Any rule using interface IP addresses in unnamed table {} will end up being
> different on 2 routers unless named {} is used.
Ah, because
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229092
--- Comment #14 from Kajetan Staszkiewicz ---
To sum it up: I don't think it is feasible to have any functionality depending
on ruleset being identical. It is really hard to achieve it and it might not
be worth the effort.
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229092
--- Comment #13 from Kajetan Staszkiewicz ---
(In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #12)
pfcksum only checks if loaded rules are the same, it does not ensure rules are
the same on 2 routers. There are a few ways to have different
