Re: [REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed for postgresql-libpq++-4.0_4 in build

2013-10-17 Thread Palle Girgensohn
iginal Message- >> From: Jason Helfman >> To: Palle Girgensohn >> Cc: Jason Helfman , pkg-fall...@freebsd.org, >> "pg...@freebsd.org" >> Sent: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:39 >> Subject: Re: [REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed >

Re: [REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed for postgresql-libpq++-4.0_4 in build

2013-10-17 Thread Palle Girgensohn
> > -Original Message- > From: Jason Helfman > To: Palle Girgensohn > Cc: Jason Helfman , pkg-fall...@freebsd.org, > "pg...@freebsd.org" > Sent: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:39 > Subject: Re: [REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed for

Re: [REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed for postgresql-libpq++-4.0_4 in build

2013-10-17 Thread Chris Rees
[REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed for postgresql-libpq++-4.0_4 in build Works for me. Chris? -jgh On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > OK? > > postgresql-libpq++$ sv

Re: [REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed for postgresql-libpq++-4.0_4 in build

2013-10-17 Thread Jason Helfman
Works for me. Chris? -jgh On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > OK? > > postgresql-libpq++$ svn diff > Index: Makefile > === > --- Makefile(revision 330638) > +++ Makefile(working copy) > @@ -13,6 +13,9

Re: [REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed for postgresql-libpq++-4.0_4 in build

2013-10-17 Thread Palle Girgensohn
OK? postgresql-libpq++$ svn diff Index: Makefile === --- Makefile(revision 330638) +++ Makefile(working copy) @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ MAINTAINER=pg...@freebsd.org COMMENT= C++ interface for PostgreSQL +DEPRECATED=

Re: [REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed for postgresql-libpq++-4.0_4 in build

2013-10-17 Thread Jason Helfman
One month timeout, if unsupported or security related issue. Does that seem reasonable? -jgh On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > pgsql@, maybe it is time to just remove this port? > > I thinks it is really harmful that we still have that port around. Last > note about l

Re: [REL - 10amd64-default][databases/postgresql-libpq++] Failed for postgresql-libpq++-4.0_4 in build

2013-10-17 Thread Palle Girgensohn
pgsql@, maybe it is time to just remove this port? I thinks it is really harmful that we still have that port around. Last note about libpq++ was in version 7.2 of PostgreSQL: [http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.2/static/libpqplusplus.html] How quickly can we remove it? 17 okt 2013 kl. 20:24 s