Re: problem updating INDEX

2006-07-26 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 20:51, Robert Huff wrote: Running: FreeBSD jerusalem.litteratus.org 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Jul 24 11:29:26 EDT 2006 suddenly last night I get this as part of the nightly run: huff@ /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Uu Updating the ports index

Re: FreeBSD Port: graphics/libgphoto2

2006-07-26 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Derrick Edwards píše v út 25. 07. 2006 v 21:08 -0400: Previously I could download and delete pictures off of my camera using digikam. Lately, I notice that I could not delete the pictures after I upgrading digikam and gphoto2. From what I have read on the net it is probbably a gphoto2

FreeBSD Port: finance/gnucash

2006-07-26 Thread consumidor
gentlemen, as you may know, gnucash had a significant upgrade a few weeks ago now it's base on gnome2 is the port on the works? if so, is there any schedule? tia, joseph karma ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

FreeBSD Apache HTTP Accept Filter Error

2006-07-26 Thread James G. Corteciano
I use FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE , Apache22 + PHP5 and MYSQL5. After installation of my MySQL, Apache22, and PHP5-extension from ports, the apache web server is starting up in FreeBSD system, Apache loads succcessfully and web server functioning properly, but the following warning error occurs: [warn]

Re: problem updating INDEX

2006-07-26 Thread Robert Huff
Beech Rintoul writes: Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait../usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk, line 353: WITH_FORTRAN and WITHOUT_FORTRAN can't both be set. === lang/gfortran failed *** Error code 1 1 error I was going to rack this up to a file not copied

RFC: bsd.sites.mk - introduce some magic

2006-07-26 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
This patch introduces a very simple, but handy (imho) framework into bsd.sites.mk: http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros.diff 1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles: Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_FOOBAR} and get away with it 2. Abbreviations Write

Re: RFC: bsd.sites.mk - introduce some magic

2006-07-26 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: This patch introduces a very simple, but handy (imho) framework into bsd.sites.mk: http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros.diff 1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles: Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of

Re: RFC: bsd.sites.mk - introduce some magic

2006-07-26 Thread Shaun Amott
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:37:37PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: 1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles: Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_FOOBAR} and get away with it 2. Abbreviations Write

Re: RFC: bsd.sites.mk - introduce some magic

2006-07-26 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 7/26/06, Shaun Amott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:37:37PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: 2. Abbreviations Write MASTER_SITES=SF and mean SOURCEFORGE I don't quite like having 3 different ways to use a

netatalk fails on install

2006-07-26 Thread David J Brooks
#portupgrade -R netatalk snip install: /usr/ports/net/netatalk/work/netatalk-2.0.3/netatalk.sh: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop in /usr/ports/net/netatalk. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/netatalk. David -- Sure the Almighty created the world in only six days, but He

Re: netatalk fails on install

2006-07-26 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David J Brooks wrote: #portupgrade -R netatalk snip install: /usr/ports/net/netatalk/work/netatalk-2.0.3/netatalk.sh: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop in /usr/ports/net/netatalk. *** Error code 1 Stop in

Re: GCCVERSION hook?

2006-07-26 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:21:51 -0600 Aaron Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ports/98753 is asking if there is a GCCVERSION hook so one can patch based on the value. ports/58317 suggests that one does indeed exist but the submitter can't find

Re: GCCVERSION hook?

2006-07-26 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2006-Jul-26 12:21:51 -0600, Aaron Dalton wrote: ports/98753 is asking if there is a GCCVERSION hook so one can patch based on the value. ports/58317 suggests that one does indeed exist but the submitter can't find one. I'm still pretty green so don't know the answer myself either. Any