Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ .
In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile
problems, which currently has 176 bad ports, is
Hi, after latest cvsup I've got this error during portupgrade -av:
install -o root -g wheel -m
444 /usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/fake/share/vlc/vlc48x48.png
/usr/X11R6/share/pixmaps/vlc.png
=== Compressing manual pages for vlc-0.8.5_5 === Running ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/X11R6/lib
On man, aug 21, 2006 at 10:01:19 +, Bill distfiles Fenner wrote:
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port
whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could
you please visit
Yar Tikhiy píše v po 21. 08. 2006 v 11:10 +0400:
Hi all,
I hoped I had learned something about using gettext in ports,
and felt I should write down a summary. Here's what came out
of that -- a proposed section for the Porter's Handbook. Its
HTML rendering is available there:
Hi!
I must be missing something obvious with MASTER_SITES.
If you consider the devel/tigcc port which I maintain you can read:
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GCC}:gcc \
${MASTER_SITE_GNU}:gas \
http://tigcc.ticalc.org/linux/:tigcc
Does anyone on this list have any input?
--
ian
- Forwarded message from Ian A. Tegebo [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:40:43 -0700
From: Ian A. Tegebo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: www/rt36 with mod_perl2 broken
Has anyone been able to build
I am the maintainer for the arpscan FreeBSD port. I noticed version 0.3 has
come out. I am able to compile and run it on FreeBSD current, but I do not get
any results. Has anyone tested version 0.3 on FreeBSD? I think there is a
problem with arpscan opening bpf. The following url contains
personally, I use rt with the fastcgi option. much easier to get it
running that way, and RT doesn't need any of the advanced features of
mod_perl so it seems overkill.
but anyhow your error seems related to p5-Log-Dispatch not rt36.
On Aug 21, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Ian A. Tegebo wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/www/bacula-web]# make fetch
This port requires the Apache Module or the CGI version of PHP, but you have
already installed a PHP port without them.
*** Error code 1
This is on a dedicated fetch/NFS server. It's not supposed to have
mod_php installed. It would be
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:07:59PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/www/bacula-web]# make fetch
This port requires the Apache Module or the CGI version of PHP, but you have
already installed a PHP port without them.
*** Error code 1
This is on a dedicated fetch/NFS
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:17:14PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote:
I must be missing something obvious with MASTER_SITES.
If you consider the devel/tigcc port which I maintain you can read:
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GCC}:gcc \
${MASTER_SITE_GNU}:gas \
The
Shaun Amott wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:17:14PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote:
I must be missing something obvious with MASTER_SITES.
If you consider the devel/tigcc port which I maintain you can read:
MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_GCC}:gcc \
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:51:34PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
personally, I use rt with the fastcgi option. much easier to get it
running that way, and RT doesn't need any of the advanced features of
mod_perl so it seems overkill.
We already use Apache22 and mod_perl2 for a number of
Hi, Ulrich!
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:25:26PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
The function checkyesno cannot handle undefined variables and will
thus print an error. This will happen ON EVERY machine that samba3 is
installed, but there is no samba_enable=YES/NO line in rc.conf.
The quick
Hi,
After a database headache caused by my own doofusity, I've been
contemplating switching from portupgrade. (Hey, it's been a few
years, things could have changed.) Checking in /usr/ports/sysutils,
it seems that we have a whole bunch of different tools -- portmaster,
portmanager, portsman,
On 8/22/06, Michael W. Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
After a database headache caused by my own doofusity, I've been
contemplating switching from portupgrade. (Hey, it's been a few
years, things could have changed.) Checking in /usr/ports/sysutils,
it seems that we have a whole bunch of
16 matches
Mail list logo
