On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44:00AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:21 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
[...]
What might make sense is for the gnupg 2.x port to install a gpg
symlink to gpg2. I've done that on my own system for convenience sake.
That will get hairy if the user
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the port x11-fm/evidence. The port are mark
broken for some time and I finally have some time to fix it!
I need some help with testing. There are some things about the
pkg-plist that I can't figure out! Sometimes there are some files that
are missing and sometimes there
Hi,
I've a question about SciTE:
Why scintilla-gtk* has /usr/local and scite-gtk* has /usr/X11R6 prefix?
Embedded in its source code, SciTE looking for it's properties files
in /usr/local/share/scite and it don't find them because the files are
placed in /usr/X11R6/share/scite...
Bye.
--
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
marcus has won the fight, so he has a patch to fix it.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2006-December/016302.html
Excellent!
I've just applied this patch and done `make deinstall', `make reinstall'
of kde-xdg-env but still have the same problem. Will
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:59:29 -0500
Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
The java/berkeley-db port fails self-tests on pointyhat. I can not
reproduce the problem on any machine, that I have access to.
It, likely, has something to do with pointyhat's running each build
in
On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
Anyway, this way maybe old-porters thinking. I liked to use
category/portname directory name (without version number).
Using version number in ports directory is very exceptional event for
keeping old ports (like emacs, emacs19, emacs20). I
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44:10AM -0600, Chuck Rock wrote:
I am unable to get this port to install. I've tried using portinstall
command and manually making it from the port's directory.
I have a fresh install of FreeBSD 6.1 with a custom kernel. I took the
generic and only added the pf
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:58:06 -0600, Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
marcus has won the fight, so he has a patch to fix it.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2006-December/016302.html
Excellent!
I've just applied this patch and done `make
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 20:18, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:58:06 -0600, Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
marcus has won the fight, so he has a patch to fix it.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2006-December/016
302.html
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers
we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete
X11BASE compliance.
Dear Porters,
Now that X11BASE errors are more or less under control (we're mostly
waiting on a few lagging maintainers to do their part), I've started
another gcc 4.1 test build so that maintainers can start to work on
that in preparation for the gcc 4.x import into 7.0.
Based on the previous
[Moving to ports@ as it's more suited for there...]
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:27:56PM -0600, Wayne M. Barnes wrote:
Dear FreeBSD,
Did something happen to the location for the pkg-descr so
that ports can't find it? The following happens to me a lot,
for many packages:
===
The developers have just released proftpd.rc1 which I'm trying to write the
upgrades for. The release contains several new modules and features which
have been added to the Makefile.
The problem I'm having is with some of the existing patches. While some were
fairly easy to adapt to the new
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
Oh, your problem is different after I read your message again. I don't
have any of printer, so unsure with your problem.
I can actually reproduce this just by doing print preview, then
hitting close, so no actual printer is needed.
Doug
--
This .signature
Hi there,
I had nautilus crash on me, the other day. I think that I can
repeat the crash: well, it's happened twice, doing the same thing
(attempting a VFS mount of a file share from a Windows laptop
that requires authentication). So I installed bugbuddy so that
it could phone home to the GNOME
Vasil Dimov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44:00AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:21 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
[...]
What might make sense is for the gnupg 2.x port to install a gpg
symlink to gpg2. I've done that on my own system for convenience sake.
That will get
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Are you maintainers really going to let your ports be the ones that
hold us up?! You know who you are since you've already received email
about this, so let's
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:09:52AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Are you maintainers really going to let your ports be the ones that
hold us up?! You know who
Hey, guys, the 1.2.10 release of MaraDNS is out of date. Please update
the port to MaraDNS 1.2.12.04. If Alex doesn't want to do this, will
someone else please step up to plate to do it. I myself have ported
MaraDNS to FreeBSD, so a compile is a ./configure; make; make install.
If you want to
Sam Trenholme wrote:
Hey, guys, the 1.2.10 release of MaraDNS is out of date. Please update
the port to MaraDNS 1.2.12.04. If Alex doesn't want to do this, will
someone else please step up to plate to do it. I myself have ported
MaraDNS to FreeBSD, so a compile is a ./configure; make; make
Sam Trenholme wrote:
Hey, guys, the 1.2.10 release of MaraDNS is out of date. Please update
the port to MaraDNS 1.2.12.04. If Alex doesn't want to do this, will
someone else please step up to plate to do it. I myself have ported
MaraDNS to FreeBSD, so a compile is a ./configure; make; make
Sam Trenholme wrote:
Hey, guys, the 1.2.10 release of MaraDNS is out of date. Please update
the port to MaraDNS 1.2.12.04. If Alex doesn't want to do this, will
Sam, I'll upgrade the port right away. Thanks for the nudge and pardon my
delays.
someone else please step up to plate to do it.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:34:35 -0600, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
Oh, your problem is different after I read your message again. I don't
have any of printer, so unsure with your problem.
I can actually reproduce this just by doing print preview, then
hitting
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:24:19PM -0600, Wayne M. Barnes wrote:
Dear FreeBSD,
I submitted this problem to current, and someone suggested
it belongs in ports.
I include several screen clips below.
My problem is that I keep getting Missing pkg-descr when
I try to make a port.
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:34:35 -0600, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
Oh, your problem is different after I read your message again. I don't
have any of printer, so unsure with your problem.
I can actually reproduce this just by doing
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:08:06PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Vasil Dimov wrote:
[...]
- NLS Native Language Support on \
[...]
+OPTIONS= NLS Include National Language Support on \
I believe the N in NLS stands for Native.
It's National. That's why you have things like
Hi Ports Maintainers,
I just spent the last few days sorting out a problem with expect on my
6.1 box. I have a patch to the expect interpreter on this platform that
I'd like to offer for your review. There's a problem with the way
expect searches for available ptys that makes it only capable of
On 12/14/06, Eric Brunson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ports Maintainers,
I just spent the last few days sorting out a problem with expect on my
6.1 box. I have a patch to the expect interpreter on this platform that
I'd like to offer for your review. There's a problem with the way
expect
28 matches
Mail list logo