Quick fix was committed. Upgrade to 2.2.2_2,2 please.
You should run 'portsdb -fu' to rebuild INDEX.db after that.
--
Dixi.
Sem.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hmzz.. currently I manage a bunch of servers - 2-3 machines with 5-6
jails on each running.
I use make package-recursive on one single server and after that
I simply define PACKAGEROOT=http://172.16.4.6/ in the env of the shell.
after that
Thierry Thomas wrote:
Work In [slow] Progress: I have just uploaded a new vtk5.tgz.
math/vtk-headers5 has been removed (files get installed by vtk5), and
now both math/vtk5 math/vtk-python5 build fine - but they do strange
things with their libs. Reviewers welcome!
Hi,
Tons of thanks,
On 2/1/07, Philip Kizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007, Jan 31, at 18:45, Csaba Molnar wrote:
I deleted /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db, then rebuilt it with pkgdb -u I
think, and
that seems to have worked.
While I was updating ports before this error showed up, the options
screen for
portupgrade
On Wed 2007-01-24 (19:51), Gordon Stratton wrote:
On 1/24/07, gareth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, portupgrade just upgraded phpbb-2.0.22 to phpbb-2.0.22_1.
it used phpBB-2.0.22.tar.bz2 from www.phpbb.com (same as before),
and as far as i can tell the .php files are the same (and naturally
the
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
Yesterday I had the same problem and garga@ helped me to solve that.
He told me to change my ports database to dbm_hash.
It's not a fix really. A fix was committed.
Well, it's worth to add a few sanity checks for DB. Really working with
DB should be complete
After my daily cvsup (as of 20070201 1300 UTC), portupgrade fails like:
elvis:~$ portupgrade -s fusefs-libs
--- Upgrading 'fusefs-libs-2.6.1' to 'fusefs-libs-2.6.2'
sysutils/fusefs-libs)
--- Building '/usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-libs'
=== Cleaning for pkg-config-0.21
=== Cleaning for gmake
Hi,
Done that too (pkgdb -fu) , but didn't work for me... :(
I use FreeBSD6-stable
Vassilis
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:45:55AM +0100, Csaba Molnar wrote:
2007. February 1. 00.34 d?tummal Joachim Bethke ezt ?rta:
Hallo,
I get the same error on two machines too. Have someone a practical
I've installed OpenOffice via package from good-day.org, version
openoffice.org-SRC680_m197, and it seems somehow that font anti-aliasing
doesn't work in it - both in the application user interface and on the
document canvas.
I've run previous versions of openoffice without problems, but I've
Mark Evenson wrote:
After my daily cvsup (as of 20070201 1300 UTC), portupgrade fails like:
[...]
make: don't know how to make misc-depends. Stop
A target removed from somewhere in /usr/ports/Mk?
Indeed it is. This patch seems to fix things:
--- bin/portupgrade.origThu Feb 1 15
Hello.
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal
# make install clean
...
hf-acpi.c:36:31: dev/acpica/acpiio.h: No such file or directory
hf-acpi.c: In function `hf_acpi_poll_batt':
hf-acpi.c:105: error: storage size of 'battif' isn't known
hf-acpi.c:105: error: storage size of 'battst' isn't known
gareth wrote:
On Wed 2007-01-24 (19:51), Gordon Stratton wrote:
On 1/24/07, gareth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, portupgrade just upgraded phpbb-2.0.22 to phpbb-2.0.22_1.
it used phpBB-2.0.22.tar.bz2 from www.phpbb.com (same as before),
and as far as i can tell the .php files are the same (and
Mark Evenson wrote:
Bug filed with GNATS, but I have to wait on the PR number.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108662
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[T]his is not a disentanglement from, but a progressive knotting into.
___
On 2/1/07, Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
Yesterday I had the same problem and garga@ helped me to solve that.
He told me to change my ports database to dbm_hash.
It's not a fix really. A fix was committed.
Well, it's worth to add a few sanity
Guys,
was there a real need to bump PORTREVISION of kdelibs3 port during a
recent update ?
I mean this is a quite heavy port and the change did not include any
functionality change (no new/updated patch, etc). The change was purely
infrastructural, so I think PORTREVISION bumping was not
Mark Evenson wrote:
make: don't know how to make misc-depends. Stop
A target removed from somewhere in /usr/ports/Mk?
Yep, the target was removed. Fighting with the last problem I forgot
about this one. Fixed right now. Thanks Mark for the patch.
--
Dixi.
Sem.
Have you updated portupgrade to the last one (2.2.2_3,2)? Do it please.
Laganakos Vassilis wrote:
Hi,
Done that too (pkgdb -fu) , but didn't work for me... :(
I use FreeBSD6-stable
Vassilis
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:45:55AM +0100, Csaba Molnar wrote:
2007. February 1. 00.34 d?tummal
I have a port (the one mentioned in my previous msg)
which needs to install its own make's include file,
bsd.linux_kmod.mk , and I thought that there was
a system-wide place such as ${PREFIX}/share/mk
where the port could install the file in the first place,
and where make would look for it by
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:17:27AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have a port (the one mentioned in my previous msg)
which needs to install its own make's include file,
bsd.linux_kmod.mk , and I thought that there was
a system-wide place such as ${PREFIX}/share/mk
where the port could install
I have a port that just need to install the content of a tarball
(a set of headers and C sources) into
/usr/local/share/linux-bsd-kmod/linux_compat,
and was wondering what is the proper way to handle this (both in
the port's Makefile and in the pkg_plist file).
Given that INSTALL doesn't have a
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:20:51PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:17:27AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have a port (the one mentioned in my previous msg)
which needs to install its own make's include file,
bsd.linux_kmod.mk , and I thought that there was
a
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:37:02PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
Yesterday I had the same problem and garga@ helped me to solve that.
He told me to change my ports database to dbm_hash.
It's not a fix really. A fix was committed.
Well, it's worth to add
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:20:51PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:17:27AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have a port (the one mentioned in my previous msg)
which needs to install its own make's include file,
Gary Kline wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:37:02PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
Yesterday I had the same problem and garga@ helped me to solve that.
He told me to change my ports database to dbm_hash.
It's not a fix really. A fix was
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Now, this may well be a one-of-a-kind case calling for an ad-hoc
solution, but if all we need is accept to use ${PREFIX}/share/mk
for third-party .mk files, this
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:20:11PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Now, this may well be a one-of-a-kind case calling for an ad-hoc
solution, but if all we need is
and to answer to your second point...
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
In term of port's backward compatibilty, the extra .PATH or -I
could be supplied by the files in /usr/ports/Mk which people
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:25:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:20:11PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Now, this may well be a
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:30:26PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
and to answer to your second point...
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
In term of port's backward compatibilty, the extra .PATH or -I
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:40:52PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:25:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:20:11PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:44:58PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:40:52PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:25:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:20:11PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
So... there is not a recursive
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:03:45AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have a port that just need to install the content of a tarball
(a set of headers and C sources) into
/usr/local/share/linux-bsd-kmod/linux_compat,
and was wondering what is the proper way to handle this (both in
the port's
My Friends,
I am trying to make the PostgreSQL to effect the authentication in the
OpenLdap.
In ports of the PostgreSQL the compilation with support to the Ldap exists?
ports/databases/postgresql82-server/
Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:41:53PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:30:26PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
and to answer to your second point...
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...
That Makefile.kld would be a fragment of a port makefile,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:57:12PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have a port that just need to install the content of a tarball
(a set of headers and C sources) into
/usr/local/share/linux-bsd-kmod/linux_compat,
and was wondering what is the proper way to handle
Hello!
I've just installed the x11-wm/xfce4 metaport over the fresh RELENG_6,
ports tree was csupped about 31-Jan-2007 12:00GMT. Now I have the following
ports installed during this procedure:
p5-XML-Parser-2.34_2
intltool-0.35.4
libxfce4util-4.4.0
atk-1.12.4
jpeg-6b_4
tiff-3.8.2_1
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:54:14AM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:03:45 -0800
Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
#--- this is pkg-plist 000
@exec mkdir -p %D/share/linux-bsd-kmod
@exec echo installing into %D/share/linux-bsd-kmod
@unexec echo
В сообщении от 1 февраля 2007 22:49 вы написали:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:53:03 +0300
mit [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
Hello.
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal
# make install clean
...
hf-acpi.c:36:31: dev/acpica/acpiio.h: No such file or directory
hf-acpi.c: In function
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:55:21AM -0800, Brian wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:37:02PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
Yesterday I had the same problem and garga@ helped me to solve that.
He told me to change my ports database to
That worked :D
I updated portupgrade and then the portupgrade was smooth!
Thanx!
Vassilis
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:46:59PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Have you updated portupgrade to the last one (2.2.2_3,2)? Do it please.
Laganakos Vassilis wrote:
Hi,
Done that too (pkgdb
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:53:03 +0300
mit [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
Hello.
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal
# make install clean
...
hf-acpi.c:36:31: dev/acpica/acpiio.h: No such file or directory
hf-acpi.c: In function `hf_acpi_poll_batt':
hf-acpi.c:105: error: storage size of 'battif' isn't
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:56:47 +0900
Artem Kazakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
Hello,
I updated the port to current version 254
Patch attached.
Committed.
I've also resetted PORTREVISION (see porters handbook).
Thanks!
--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE
pgprMOMQcd4P9.pgp
Description: PGP
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:03:45 -0800
Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
I have a port that just need to install the content of a tarball
(a set of headers and C sources) into
/usr/local/share/linux-bsd-kmod/linux_compat,
and was wondering what is the proper way to handle this (both in
On Thu 2007-02-01 (23:24), LI Xin wrote:
ah, thanx for the link. so this's the only thing that changed? :
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/phpbb/files/Attic/security-patch-includes-sessions.php?annotate=1.2
Yes. The only change is that the patch is removed and
44 matches
Mail list logo
