FreeBSD Port: please get print/pdftk working on amd64

2007-03-29 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I tried to find a place to report a wishlist bug against pdftk on URL:http://www.freshports.org/print/pdftk/, but failed. Trying an email here instead. Please forward it to a more appropriate location if needed. I'm a user on a amd64 FreeBSD machine, and in need of the pdftk program. Trying

Re: A review of different port management tools : analysis for Google SoC project

2007-03-29 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2007-Mar-28 16:03:46 -0500, Corey Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ramblings of a long time FreeBSD user: * Use the pkg_* tools to manage the system binaries too: Imagine if installing the man pages would be as easy as: pkg_add -r freebsd-6.1-man As a general principal, this sounds good - and

phpbb-2.0.22_1 does not work

2007-03-29 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, I installed phpbb-2.0.22_1 and compiled it with php5. The (web-)installation completed successfully but nothing happens when I click on any link at the webpage (e.g. Search, Register, Login, ...). Pebkac? Thanks, Helmut ___

Re: [PATCH] math/asymptote-1.23 build broken on 6.2-Stable i386; also unsolved problems with AFPL Ghostscript integration

2007-03-29 Thread Nicola Vitale
Hi, [2007/3/27, bf [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Building WITH_GSL=yes on my machine, the first hunk of the math/asymptote/files/patch-Makefile.in fails, probably because of the 1.23 source Makefile.in's line 9, It has been fixed, thanks. Also, when generating the asymptote documentation/examples,

joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

2007-03-29 Thread Vizion
Hi Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile so as ro be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a chosen directory for a number of virtual hosts. Thanks in advance david ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: phpbb-2.0.22_1 does not work

2007-03-29 Thread Helmut Schneider
From: Helmut Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] I installed phpbb-2.0.22_1 and compiled it with php5. The (web-)installation completed successfully but nothing happens when I click on any link at the webpage (e.g. Search, Register, Login, ...). Pebkac? SIC PEBKAC. I swear I removed the install

Re: phpbb-2.0.22_1 does not work

2007-03-29 Thread LI Xin
Hi, Helmut Schneider wrote: From: Helmut Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] I installed phpbb-2.0.22_1 and compiled it with php5. The (web-)installation completed successfully but nothing happens when I click on any link at the webpage (e.g. Search, Register, Login, ...). Pebkac? SIC

ports installation location

2007-03-29 Thread Vizion
How does one specify a non-standard location for installing a port? For example I want to have multiple instances of www/joomla installed for multiple virtual hosts. How can I best go about this? How about upgrades? david ___

Re: ports installation location

2007-03-29 Thread Garrett Cooper
Vizion wrote: How does one specify a non-standard location for installing a port? For example I want to have multiple instances of www/joomla installed for multiple virtual hosts. How can I best go about this? How about upgrades? david Can't do that with ports (unless you make your own

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

2007-03-29 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile so as ro be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a chosen directory for a number of virtual hosts. Maybe I'm confused (I did bang my head yesterday), but isn't that exactly

Re: ports installation location

2007-03-29 Thread Vizion
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Garrett Cooper Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:21 AM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports installation location Vizion wrote: How does one specify a non-standard location for

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

2007-03-29 Thread Vizion
Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile so as ro be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a chosen directory for a number of virtual hosts. Maybe I'm confused (I did bang my head yesterday), but isn't that exactly

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

2007-03-29 Thread Vizion
-Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just wonder if anyone is able to

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

2007-03-29 Thread youshi10
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Vizion wrote: -Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

2007-03-29 Thread youshi10
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Vizion wrote: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile so as ro be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a chosen directory for a number of virtual hosts. Maybe I'm confused (I did bang my head

Re: ports installation location

2007-03-29 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 3/29/07, Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How does one specify a non-standard location for installing a port? For example I want to have multiple instances of www/joomla installed for multiple virtual hosts. How can I best go about this? I haven't tried this, but looking at the ports

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

2007-03-29 Thread Vizion
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:46 AM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Vizion wrote:

Port build problem for ImageMagick

2007-03-29 Thread Clint Olsen
Hi: I'm on this machine: FreeBSD belle.0lsen.net 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Mon Oct 23 13:04:36 PDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELLE i386 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./magick -I./wand -I./ltdl

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

2007-03-29 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

portmaster and portmanager disagree

2007-03-29 Thread Mark Ovens
Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager -u''. Numerous failures, conflicts etc. as usual. Got most of them sorted but ``portmanager -s'' still reports a load as MISSING, but they aren't; the directories are in /var/db/pkg and the apps work. portmanager(1) builds and

Re: Port build problem for ImageMagick

2007-03-29 Thread Uwe Grohnwaldt
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:41:37 -0800 Clint Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: I'm on this machine: FreeBSD belle.0lsen.net 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Mon Oct 23 13:04:36 PDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELLE i386 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=CC

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

2007-03-29 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:36:53PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: joomla ports -

Re: Port build problem for ImageMagick

2007-03-29 Thread youshi10
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Clint Olsen wrote: Hi: I'm on this machine: FreeBSD belle.0lsen.net 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Mon Oct 23 13:04:36 PDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELLE i386 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile cc

Re: portmaster and portmanager disagree

2007-03-29 Thread Robert Noland
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager -u''. Numerous failures, conflicts etc. as usual. Got most of them sorted but ``portmanager -s'' still reports a load as MISSING, but they aren't; the directories are in

Re: Port build problem for ImageMagick

2007-03-29 Thread youshi10
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Uwe Grohnwaldt wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:41:37 -0800 Clint Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: I'm on this machine: FreeBSD belle.0lsen.net 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Mon Oct 23 13:04:36 PDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELLE i386 /bin/sh

Re: Port build problem for ImageMagick

2007-03-29 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Thursday, 29. March 2007, Scot Hetzel wrote: The problem is that graphviz is listed as a RUN_DEPENDS, and doesn't get installed before the build stage. It needs to be changed to a LIB_DEPENDS, and the path to libgvc.* needs to be added to LDFLAGS. PR 111018 submitted to fix this probem.

Re: fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_3 requires the Kernel source to be installed

2007-03-29 Thread Sam Cates
Nevermind, I found this If there is *not* a /usr/src/sys directory on your system, then the kernel source has not been installed. The easiest way to do this is by running sysinstall as root, choosing Configure, then Distributions, then src, then base and sys. at

Re: portmaster and portmanager disagree

2007-03-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: Robert Noland wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager -u''. Numerous failures, conflicts etc. as usual. Got most of them sorted but

Re: portmaster and portmanager disagree

2007-03-29 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:00:52 -0500, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: Robert Noland wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager -u''. Numerous

Re: Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop

2007-03-29 Thread Rico Secada
Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:41:03 +0200 From: Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:26:03 -0500 Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico

Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop

2007-03-29 Thread Rico Secada
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:45:30 -0800 Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote: Hi All. I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third

Re: Fw: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop

2007-03-29 Thread Danny Pansters
On Friday 30 March 2007 00:07:32 Rico Secada wrote: Hi All. I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO. First important thing is

Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop

2007-03-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote: Hi All. I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO. Building

Re: Ports management in 4.11

2007-03-29 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote: Charles Sprickman wrote: Hi all, I understand 4.11 is dead, but I've still got about 20 odd boxes to take care of for the next few months until we can figure out what breaks in 6.x for us. I saw that it's recommended to use the RELEASE_4_EOL tag

Re: portmaster and portmanager disagree

2007-03-29 Thread RW
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:15:19 -0500 Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you guys should stop use portmanager. I personal don't trust it. Something tells me, that that doesn't come from an exhaustive walkthrough of the source code. All of the upgrade tools have significant faults,

Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop

2007-03-29 Thread Uwe Grohnwaldt
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:46:34 +0200 Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All. I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.

Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop

2007-03-29 Thread RW
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:07:32 +0200 Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All. I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO. Why do

Re: portmaster and portmanager disagree

2007-03-29 Thread Danny Pansters
Maybe you guys should stop use portmanager. I personal don't trust it. I'm not familiar with portmanager or portmaster. I use portupgrade and the standard pkg-* and ports' make foo utilities but I don't think that this is a proper way to talk about a tool that someone has made to make life

170kB patch - how to handle?

2007-03-29 Thread Bartosz Fabianowski
Good day I would like to improve the audio/libvorbis port by optionally patching in the aoTuV psychoacoustics, which are considered to be superior to stock libvorbis. However, the patch file that does this is ~170kB in size. I am wondering whether it is OK to put such a large file directly

Re: 170kB patch - how to handle?

2007-03-29 Thread Sam Lawrance
On 30/03/2007, at 12:19 PM, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote: Good day I would like to improve the audio/libvorbis port by optionally patching in the aoTuV psychoacoustics, which are considered to be superior to stock libvorbis. However, the patch file that does this is ~170kB in size. I am

Re: Fw: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop

2007-03-29 Thread Frank Mayhar
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 00:07 +0200, Rico Secada wrote: Hi All. I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO. Building everything

Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop

2007-03-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote: Hi All. I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO. Building

Difference between pkg_create and make package

2007-03-29 Thread david
Hi, Is there any difference between pkg_create -Rb or make package-recursive in the resulting package file? I tried a pkg_create -Rb and copied the files to another machine, and when i installed the package it worked, but the program didn't load properly (xorg + xfce4). It worked on the

Difference between pkg_create and make package

2007-03-29 Thread David N
Hi, I appologise if this has been submitted multiple times, but I can't seem to send to the mailing list, i hope this works. Is there any difference between pkg_create -Rb or make package-recursive in the resulting package file? I tried a pkg_create -Rb and copied the files to another machine,