-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello group,
what alternative can I use insted of the port scheduled for deletion:
portname: security/cyrus-sasl
description:RFC SASL (Simple Authentication and Security
Layer)
maintainer: [EMAIL
I've submitted a PR with an update: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-
pr.cgi?pr=79
Thanks
Nick
On Mar 31, 2007, at 11:42 PM, Thomas Schürmann wrote:
Hello,
From otrs.org
2007-03-05 OTRS 2.1.6 (Playa Esmeralda) is released!
Can you make an update?
greetings
* Rong-En Fan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
After pav@'s commit to bsd.port.mk, now you can test WITH/WITHOUT
freely with OPTIONS. Also, when the set of OPTIONS is changed, users
will be prompted to the dialog again (thank you pav!).
So good, thanks a lot pav!
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Dan Casey píše v út 03. 04. 2007 v 11:42 -0400:
I am setting up a single server as a 'build box' for our freebsd
servers. We want to build our own packages because
1. we may need to compile certain ports with different flags then
freebsd chooses.
2. We want to update ports only when needed.
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:42:20 -0400
Dan Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble finding documentation that goes in more detail
then that of the handbook. I am sending this message in hopes that
you may be able to point me in the right direction, or know of a
better way to
Dan Casey wrote:
...
What I'm setting up is a regular ports tree (/usr/ports) which is Not
updated. Then a second tree /usr/local/current-ports which is updated
daily with portsnap.
Packages make this kind of messing unnecessary. Having an up to date ports tree
doesn't force you to update
The Directory of Clubrural.com Tourism invites to you to interchange a
connection if these interested beam click but down
http://www.clubrural.com/links/
El Directorio de Turismo Clubrural.com te invita a intercambiar un enlace si
estas interesado haz click mas abajo
postfix 2.4 is out, if you don't take a stab it, we might look at what
it needs for freebsd ports next week sometime.
if you have experimental patches in the mean time, feel free to send
them to us to test.
_
This email
Michael Scheidell wrote:
postfix 2.4 is out, if you don't take a stab it, we might look at what
it needs for freebsd ports next week sometime.
I'm working on that.
Possible patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mnag/postfix.patch
Regards
if you have experimental patches in the mean time,
On 2007/04/03 14:12, Rong-En Fan wrote:
After pav@'s commit to bsd.port.mk, now you can test WITH/WITHOUT
freely with OPTIONS.
I filed a PR ports/78343 with similar patch, but the PR was rejected.
Why the policy has been changed?
--
NIIMI Satoshi
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:52:57AM +0900, NIIMI Satoshi wrote:
On 2007/04/03 14:12, Rong-En Fan wrote:
After pav@'s commit to bsd.port.mk, now you can test WITH/WITHOUT
freely with OPTIONS.
I filed a PR ports/78343 with similar patch, but the PR was rejected.
Why the policy has been
On 4/4/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
===
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
In file included from
/usr/local/include/libgnome-2.0/libgnome/gnome-program.h:41,
from
12 matches
Mail list logo
