On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 21:10:21 +0200
Marcus Ahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
My daily cronscript reported this morning that there was a new
version of ruby+pthreads:
ruby+pthreads-1.8.5.12,1 needs updating (index has
1.8.6,1)
However, when I was about to upgrade it, it didn't
[px.gif] [px.gif] [px.gif] [px.gif] [px.gif]
[px.gif] If you experience problems viewing this newsletter, [1]Click
here
[2]Collegium Musicum Produzioni Musicali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[px.gif]
[4]www.collegiummusicum.org [px.gif]
Greetings,
I just saw this after portsnap fetch update when running pkg_version -IvL=:
ruby-1.8.5.12,1succeeds index (index has 1.8.6)
Please restore ruby's PORTEPOCH - and consider installing pre-commit check
scripts on the CVS master server that refuse Makefile commits
I raised a query about maildrop a couple of weeks ago howver we still have:
** Port marked as IGNORE: mail/maildrop:
is marked as broken: FAM system mismatch: gamin is installed and
desired FAM system is fam
Any news yet?
thanks
david
___
[sorry for spamming so many lists but all of them seem to be relevant]
$ uname -srm
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64
$ cc -dumpmachine
$
From gcc(1):
-dumpmachine
Print the compiler's target machine (for example,
i686-pc-linux-gnu)---and don't do anything else.
At
On 4/5/07, Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ uname -srm
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64
$ cc -dumpmachine
$
From gcc(1):
-dumpmachine
Print the compiler's target machine (for example,
i686-pc-linux-gnu)---and don't do anything else.
At least configure script of
Adriy,
On 4/5/07, Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 05/04/2007 12:41 Oliver Fromme said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
[sorry for spamming so many lists but all of them seem to be relevant]
$ uname -srm
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64
$ cc -dumpmachine
$
I get
Andriy Gapon wrote:
[sorry for spamming so many lists but all of them seem to be relevant]
$ uname -srm
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64
$ cc -dumpmachine
$
I get the same empty result on a 32bit RELENG_6 (i386)
machine here. It seems to be normal.
At least configure script of
On 4/5/07, Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[sorry for spamming so many lists but all of them seem to be relevant]
$ uname -srm
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64
$ cc -dumpmachine
$
From gcc(1):
-dumpmachine
Print the compiler's target machine (for example,
on 05/04/2007 12:41 Oliver Fromme said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
[sorry for spamming so many lists but all of them seem to be relevant]
$ uname -srm
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64
$ cc -dumpmachine
$
I get the same empty result on a 32bit RELENG_6 (i386)
Hi,
currently I am very frustrated because I'm trying to get scponlyc running. I
successfully use it on OpenBSD for many years now.
According to
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-January/139866.html I
mounted devfs to my jail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Helmut Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
currently I am very frustrated because I'm trying to get scponlyc
running. I successfully use it on OpenBSD for many years now.
According to
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-January/139866.h
tml I mounted devfs to my jail:
I recently installed some PostgreSQL 8.2 servers (and upgraded some from
8.1), and it reminded me of a few lingering nits in our port that bug
me. Mostly the port seems that it can't make up its mind about VACCUM
strategy.
* We have a patch that sets autovacuum = yes in the default
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Greetings,
I just saw this after portsnap fetch update when running pkg_version -IvL=:
ruby-1.8.5.12,1succeeds index (index has 1.8.6)
Please restore ruby's PORTEPOCH - and consider installing
From: David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Maildrop -- any news - is this broken permanently?
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 03:07:35 -0700
I raised a query about maildrop a couple of weeks ago howver we still have:
** Port marked as IGNORE: mail/maildrop:
is marked as broken: FAM
Hi!
I'm one of those people who don't like extra dependencies, and I'm
disappointed that, while it's required by many useful apps,
x11/kdelibs3 does not provide options to disable obviously useless
for many people functionality and, thus, additional depends (arts,
libthai, fam, aspell, libidn
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:47:27 -0500, Andrew Karev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear maintainer!
Is it possible to apply changes from the attached file?
Change list:
1. Allows to compile at RELENG_4 (added conditional dependency to
devel/libgnugetopt). Yes, I know, that support for this branch is
= qemu
-PORTVERSION= 0.9.0s.20070322
+PORTVERSION= 0.9.0s.20070405
CATEGORIES=emulators
MASTER_SITES= http://qemu.org/:release \
http://qemu-forum.ipi.fi/qemu-snapshots/:snapshot \
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
http://www.volny.cz/xnavara/qemu/:snapshot
Hi,
I would like to use diablo-jdk under my fresh 7.0-CURRENT.
Is it correct that I have to use the binaries from FreeBSD 5.x instead
of FreeBSD 6.x ?
The Makefile check:
.if ${OSVERSION} = 60 ${OSVERSION} = 70
JDK_OSREL=freebsd6
.elif ${OSVERSION} = 50 ${ARCH} == i386
Hi,
MAN# pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry database
Stale dependency: GraphicsMagick-1.1.7 - ghostscript-gpl-8.56_2
(print/ghostscript-gpl):
ghostscript-gnu-7.07_15 (score:76%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no]
Install stale dependency? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [yes] no
New dependency? (?
On 4/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
MAN# pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry database
Stale dependency: GraphicsMagick-1.1.7 - ghostscript-gpl-8.56_2
(print/ghostscript-gpl):
ghostscript-gnu-7.07_15 (score:76%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no]
Install stale
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:33:11PM +0200, Peter, Oliver wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use diablo-jdk under my fresh 7.0-CURRENT.
Is it correct that I have to use the binaries from FreeBSD 5.x instead
of FreeBSD 6.x ?
The Makefile check:
.if ${OSVERSION} = 60 ${OSVERSION} = 70
I have recently noticed serious issues with collections from the FreeBSD
source tree maintained on cvsup.au.freebsd.org (cvsup.planetmirror.com), and
have sought to compare it to two of the US servers, cvsup3 and cvsup4, and
have found that cvsup.au.freebsd.org seems to be very wrong, with most of
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:25:11AM +1000, Christopher Martin wrote:
I have recently noticed serious issues with collections from the FreeBSD
source tree maintained on cvsup.au.freebsd.org (cvsup.planetmirror.com), and
have sought to compare it to two of the US servers, cvsup3 and cvsup4, and
--- Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:25:11AM +1000, Christopher Martin wrote:
I have recently noticed serious issues with collections from the FreeBSD
source tree maintained on cvsup.au.freebsd.org (cvsup.planetmirror.com),
and
have sought to compare it
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -u -r1.72 Makefile
--- Makefile25 Mar 2007 16:33:01 - 1.72
+++ Makefile5 Apr 2007 16:08:57 -
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
#
PORTNAME= qemu
-PORTVERSION= 0.9.0s.20070322
+PORTVERSION= 0.9.0s.20070405
CATEGORIES=emulators
MASTER_SITES= http://qemu.org
26 matches
Mail list logo
