Hi,
I ported Wcalc to FreeBSD, and wanted to get it added to the ports
section. Hence, I did a web-submit of the PR. Some problem occurred,
and I never got a response back from the PR web-submit system. I then
queried the database to see if the PR was submitted, but nothing
turned up. Assuming
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:35:16AM +0530, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
I then queried the database to see if the PR was submitted, but nothing
turned up.
It takes 5-10 minutes for the automated processes all to run to process
the latest PRs before they will show up on the web page.
mcl
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2007.04.19 19:01:39 +0800, Foxfair Hu wrote:
vuxml - security-team's baby.
Cc added.
The problem is caused by interesting version numbering in the
www/lynx-current port which now conflicts with www/lynx:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:lynx-current] make -V PKGNAME
lynx-2.8.7d4
Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Is it possible to put ${SETENV} ${GEM_ENV} before ${RUBYGEMBIN}?
Since Konstantin's new port required passing
MAKEFLAGS=CPPFLAGS=-I/${LOCALBASE}/include
to the gem build/install environment.
Looks OK to me, I will test it today and report
Hello,
Great news!
Thanks a lot for your effort!
Where may I learn how to become a port maintainer? I've seen the
Porter's Handbook, but I am not sure I will have enough time to read
all this handbook in order to maintain the grace port. There some
short handbook to know the basic skills to
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:33:55PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Michael Johnson wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.10.11/gdk'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
On Apr 24, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Michael Johnson wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/
gtk+-2.10.11/gdk'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving
Hi
I am looking for some general advice and guidance for selecting software
components to fulfill a proof of concept test.
I need a mail application with features requiring that incoming mails, which
should comply with a predetermined format, be initially examined for
compliance with that
Is this a problem with the gmake port (a dependency of qt4) or should I
go ahead and submit the bug report to GNU gcc?
...
cd doc ; make install
./../etc/mkinstalldirs /usr/local/man/man1 /usr/local/info
install -o root -g wheel -m 444 ./screen.1 /usr/local/man/man1/screen.1
make screen.info
--On Wednesday, April 25, 2007 06:43:34 -0700 David Southwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am looking for some general advice and guidance for selecting software
components to fulfill a proof of concept test.
I need a mail application with features requiring that incoming mails,
which
mark foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a problem with the gmake port (a dependency of qt4) or should I
go ahead and submit the bug report to GNU gcc?
qmake, not gmake; I corrected the subject line
...
cd doc ; make install
./../etc/mkinstalldirs /usr/local/man/man1 /usr/local/info
I know I've seen this discussed a dozen times, but google is letting me
down right now.
Basically, I want to create a private branch of the ports tree for
scripts and other stuff that isn't suitable to submit back to the main
ports tree, and use portupgrade and other ports tools to maintain this
On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:47 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
You can find in several printable formats here:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-
handbook
Thank you. That is exactly what I was looking for.
-j
--
Jeffrey Goldberg
On Apr 25, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
My thought is to make /usr/ports/private (or similar) and teach cvsup
not to blow it away. Then I just need to make sure that portupgrade
and other tools see it.
Does anyone have a HOWTO or list of steps to get this going? I know
this has been
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know I've seen this discussed a dozen times, but google is letting me
down right now.
It's not heavily documented, but most people who need it seem to be
able to figure it out pretty easily. The trick for a full-net search
might be using bsd.local.mk.
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
qmake, not gmake; I corrected the subject line
Er, ah, yes thanks.
...
cd doc ; make install
./../etc/mkinstalldirs /usr/local/man/man1 /usr/local/info
install -o root -g wheel -m 444 ./screen.1 /usr/local/man/man1/screen.1
make screen.info
makeinfo --no-split
On Apr 25, 2007, at 8:43 AM, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
I am looking for some general advice and guidance for selecting
software
components to fulfill a proof of concept test.
I need a mail application with features requiring that incoming
mails, which
should comply with a predetermined
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 12:12:44 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Hi
I am looking for some general advice and guidance for selecting
software
components to fulfill a proof of concept test.
I need a mail application with features requiring that incoming
mails, which
should comply
Hi,
additionally to former posts, maybe have a look at /usr/ports/mail/dbmail
I am not sure about your detailed needs, but maybe this will help.
You can use it for storing (postfix as frontend) and retrieving
(dbmail includes pop3/imap daemon) mails in a database. Most of the
config, e.g. users,
On Apr 25, 2007, at 3:37 PM, David Southwell wrote:
Iddentification and authentication processess are assisted by the
email
containing attachments which are small one time use files that
should only be
in the possession of a specific valid user.
Then doesn't this solve your problem? The
Wesley Shields wrote:
Thats odd, because i never specified this option. This was part of a xfce4
compile. Going in to cairo's port manually, and only typing in make still
results in it using WITHOUT_X11. I had to manually edit the Makefile and
take that IF out for it to compile properly.
Michael Johnson wrote:
Thats odd, because i never specified this option. This was part of a
xfce4 compile. Going in to cairo's port manually, and only typing in
make still results in it using WITHOUT_X11. I had to manually edit
the Makefile and take that IF out for it to compile properly
Sorry, but we need to do something... i can help if u want, but tell me how.
I dont like my freebsd with vesa in my laptop.
I have an ATI Mobility x1400
Andrés (acr30)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Apr 25, 2007, at 9:18 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Michael Johnson wrote:
Thats odd, because i never specified this option. This was part
of a xfce4 compile. Going in to cairo's port manually, and only
typing in make still results in it using WITHOUT_X11. I had to
manually edit the
Andres Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, but we need to do something... i can help if u want, but tell me how.
I dont like my freebsd with vesa in my laptop.
I have an ATI Mobility x1400
The ATI driver isn't open-source, so porting it isn't really an option.
Guys, sometime during the last couple of month ``larn'' got broken.
When I start playing it, everything goes well until I find an object -
potion or scroll. If I try to pick it up, I get BUS error.
Any ideas what's going on?
Also, I'm attaching patch that allows ``larn'' to correctly send an
26 matches
Mail list logo
